Skip to main content

Developing-Country Issues for WTO Multilateral Trade Negotiations

  • Chapter
Trade, Development and Political Economy

Abstract

The failure of the World Trade Organization (WTO) 3rd Ministerial Meeting in Seattle to launch a new round of multilateral trade negotiations was a setback for the development of a liberal international trade system governed by multilaterally agreed rules. This failure should be a cause of concern to developing countries since they benefit greatly from a rules-based trading system. The lack of agreement in Seattle to review existing rules that are not helpful to development will not cause the problems faced by developing countries to disappear; nor will their reasonable concerns be addressed about the implementation of the Uruguay Round (UR) agreements or their needs for additional assistance. At the same time, WTO negotiations on Agriculture and Services, already mandated under the UR, will go forward, as will a review of the Trade Related Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPs) Agreement, scheduled for 200O. Thus, in the months and years ahead, developing countries will need to develop strategies regarding the ongoing negotiations, identify topics that they themselves want to bring to the WTO as well as positions on issues that others propose for multilateral trade negotiations. No single strategy will suit them all. Their varying trading interests require that they develop different strategies and pursue them in the context of coalitions with other WTO members.

The author is Senior Economic Advisor in the World Bank. The views expressed in this essay are solely those of the author and should not be in any way attributed to the World Bank. He wishes to thank Sam Laird and Frank Wolter of the WTO, Otto Genne of the Netherlands delegation to the WTO, Esperenza Duran of AITIC, Will Martin of the World Bank and Richard Snape for helpful comments on earlier drafts of this chapter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anderson, K., ‘The WTO Agenda for the New Millennium’, Economic Record, 75 (228) (March 1999) 77–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhagwati, J., and Srinivasan, T. N., ‘Trade and the Environment: Does Environmental Diversity Detract from the Case from Free Trade?’, in J. Bhagwati, and R. Hudec (eds), Fair Trade and Harmonization (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1996) pp. 159–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braga, C. A., ‘Trade-related Intellectual. Property Rights: the Uruguay Round Agreement and its Economic Implications’, in W. Martin and L. A. Winters (eds), The Uruguay Round and the Developing Countries (London: Cambridge University Press, 1996) pp. 341–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Correa, C. M., Implementing the TRIPS Agreement (Penang: Third World Network, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  • Croome, J., ‘The Present Outlook for Trade Negotiations in the World Trade Organization’, Policy Research Working Paper, no. 1992 (Washington, DC: World Bank, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  • Das, B. L., The WTO Agreements: Defficiencies, Imbalances and Required Changes, (Penang: Third World Network, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  • Deardorff, A., ‘Welfare Effects of Global Patent Protection’, Economica, 59 (1992) 35–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duran, E., and Michalopoulos, C., ‘Intellectual Property Rights and Developing Countries in the WTO “Millennium” Round’, The Journal of World Intellectual Property, 2 (6) (November 1999) 853–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evenett, S., and Hoekman, B., ‘Government Procurement: Do Border Barriers Matter?’, CEPR Workshop (London, 19–20 February 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  • Finger, J. M., and Winters, L. A., ‘What Can the WTO Do for Developing Countries?’, in A. O. Krueger (ed.), The WTO as an International Organization (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  • Finger, J. M., and Schuler, P., ‘Implementation of Uruguay Round Commitments: the Development Challenge’, Policy Research Working Paper, no. 2215, World Bank (October 1999) pp. 365–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francois, J., and Wooton, I., ‘Trade in International Transport Services: The Role of Competition’, Rotterdam University (processed, August 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hertel, T., and Martin, W., ‘Developing Countries Interests in Liberalizing Manufactures Trade’, CEPR Workshop (London, 19–20 February 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoekman, B., and Holmes, P., ‘Competition Policy, Developing Countries and the WTO’, Policy Research Working Paper, no. 2211, World Bank (October 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoekman, B., and Saggi, K., ‘Multilateral Disciplines for Investment-Related Policies?’, paper presented at the Conference on Global Regionalism, Instituto Affari Internazionali (Rome, 8–9 February 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  • International Grains Council, Food Aid Committee, ‘Food Aid Convention’ (London, 24 March 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, A. O. (ed.), The WTO as an International Organization (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, A. O., ‘The Developing Countries and the Next Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations’, The World Economy, 22 (7) (September 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, A. O., and Michalopoulos, C., ‘Developing Country Trade Policies and the International Economic System’, in E. Preeg (ed.), Hard Bargaining Ahead: US Trade Policy and Developing Countries (Washington, DC: Overseas Development Council, 1985) pp. 39–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwa, A., and Bello, W., ‘Guide to the WTO Agreement in Agriculture’, Chulalong University (processed) (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  • Laird, S., ‘Multilateral Approaches to Market Access Negotiations’, in M. R. Mendoza, P. Low and B. Kotschwar (eds), Trade Rules in the Making (Washington, DC: Brookings, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  • Low, P., and Subramanian, A., ‘Beyond TRIMS: a Case for Multilateral Action on Investment Rules and Competition Policy’, in W. Martin and L. A. Winters (eds), The Uruguay Round and the Developing Countries (London: Cambridge University Press, 1996) pp. 380–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michalopoulos, C., ‘Non Tariff Measures’, Trade and Development, no. 6 (Washington, DC: Development Committee, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  • Michalopoulos, C., ‘WTO Accession for Countries in Transition’, Post-Soviet Prospects, VI (3) (1998). Available at www.csis.org/html/psp.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Michalopoulos, C., ‘Developing Countries in the WTO’, The World Economy, 22 (1) (1999a) 117–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michalopoulos, ‘Trade Policy and Market Access Issues for Developing Countries’, Policy Research Working Paper, no. 2214, World Bank (October 1999b).

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD, ‘Trade Measures in Multilateral Environmental Agreements: Synthesis Report of Three Case Studies’, COM/END/TD(98) 127FINAL (Paris: OECD, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shahin, M., ‘Trade and the Environment in the WTO: a Review of its Initial Work and Future Prospects’ (Penang: Third World Network, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan, T. N., Developing Countries and the Multilateral Trading System: From the GATT to the Uruguay Round and the Future (Boulder and Oxford Westview Press, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCTAD, ‘Post-Uruguay Round Tariff Environment for Developing Country Exports’, UNCTAD/WTO Joint Study, TD/B/COM.1/14 (October 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCTAD, The Least Developed Countries 1998 Report (Geneva: United Nations, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  • WTO, The Results of the Uruguay Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations: the Legal Texts (Geneva: WTO, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • WTO, ‘Trade-Related Technical Assistance Needs-Assessment’, Committee on Trade and Development, WT/COMTD/IF/1–38 (1997–98).

    Google Scholar 

  • WTO, Cairns Group Ministerial Meeting, Communiqué, WT/L/263 (April 1998a).

    Google Scholar 

  • WTO, ‘Declaration on Global Electronic Commerce’, WT/MIN/(98)/DEC/2 (26 May 1998b).

    Google Scholar 

  • WTO, ‘Market Access for Exports of Goods and Services from the LDCs: Barriers and Constraints’, WT/COMT/LDC/W/11/REV.1 (4 December 1998c).

    Google Scholar 

  • WTO, ‘Developing Countries and the Multilateral Trading System: Past and Present’, Development Division, Background Document for High Level Symposium on Trade and Development (Geneva, 17–18 March 1999a).

    Google Scholar 

  • WTO, ‘Work Programme on Electronic Commerce’, S/C/8 (March 1999b).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2001 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Michalopoulos, C. (2001). Developing-Country Issues for WTO Multilateral Trade Negotiations. In: Lal, D., Snape, R.H. (eds) Trade, Development and Political Economy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230523685_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics