Abstract
For many decades, it seemed, the favourite writer and poet of most Anglo-Saxon political comparativists was Rudyard Kipling — if only for the legitimacy and dignity that his eagerly-quoted observation about the impossibility of understanding England from a purely English view added to their own work. Times have changed, though. There is no longer any need to buttress, or justify, comparative ambitions in political science by citing patron saints from outside the discipline. Today, it would seem, there is a greater burden on those who are unwilling to shed at least some comparative light on their subjects.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
There has been a growing consensus among observers that the formal scrutiny and appointment process of presidential nominations in the Senate has turned into a largely dysfunctional procedure. See on this the special issue of the Brookings Review, vol. 19 (2001), no. 2, ed. by G. Calvin Mackenzie.
This seems to reflect a more general historical trend. The average tenures of US cabinet secretaries have risen continuously since the Nixon presidency (National Journal, 22 May 1999: 1387–8). The average term of Clinton’s cabinet secretaries was only slightly less than four years.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2005 Ludger Helms
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Helms, L. (2005). Making Sense of Complexity: Comparative Perspectives and Conclusions. In: Presidents, Prime Ministers and Chancellors. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230502918_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230502918_8
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-4039-4251-7
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-50291-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)