Skip to main content

Transnationalism and the Theory of European Integration: Political Science Perspectives

  • Chapter
Transnational Europe

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics ((PSEUP))

Abstract

Tuesday, February 14, 2006, was a typical winter day in Strasbourg with mild rain and moderate temperatures. Yet the crowd that had gathered outside the European Parliament building was anything but typical: 50,000 demonstrators had heeded a call by the European Trade Union Confederation (ETUC) to protest against the European Commission’s proposal for a Services Directive. Two days ahead of a European Parliament vote on the directive, their speeches, banners, and sirens signaled an unequivocal ‘no’ — in various languages — to the European Commission’s plans. The rally in Strasbourg was the culmination of a months-long campaign, directed mainly against the ‘country of origin principle’ contained in the draft directive, a rule that would have allowed service providers from any European Union (EU) state to work elsewhere in the Union under their home country’s labor and safety standards. When the European Parliament passed its own version of the directive two days later, the ‘country of origin principle’ had been eliminated. ‘A major victory for European workers,’ boasted ETUC in a press release (2006b). John Monks, its General Secretary, declared, ‘Trade unions are a political force to be reckoned with’ (ETUC 2006a).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Albert, M. (2002) ‘Governance and Democracy in European Systems: On Systems Theory and European Integration’, Review of International Studies, 28(2), 293–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balme, R. and D. Chabanet (2008) European Governance and Democracy: Power and Protest in the EU (Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield).

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. and E. Grande (2007) Cosmopolitan Europe (Cambridge: Polity Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellamy, R. and D. Castiglione (2003) ‘Legitimizing the Euro-“Polity” and Its “Regime”: The Normative Turn in EU Studies’, European Journal of Political Theory, 2(1), 7–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Checkel, J. T. (2006) ‘Constructivism and EU Politics’, in K. E. Jørgensen, M. A. Pollack, and B. Rosamond (eds.) Handbook of European Union Politics (London: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • Delhey, J. (2008) ‘Do Enlargements Make the European Union Less Cohesive? An Analysis of Trust between EU Nationalities’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 45(2), 253–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, K., S. A. Burrell, R. A. Kann, M. Lee, M. Lichterman, R. E. Lindgren, F. L. Loewenheim, and R. W. Van Wagenen (1957) Political Community and the North Atlantic Area: International Organization in the Light of Historical Experience (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Duchesne, S. and A.-P. Frognier (2008) ‘National and European Identifications: A Dual Relationship’, Comparative European Politics, 6(2), 143–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eberlein, B. and A. Newman (2009) ‘Tackling the Regulatory Dilemma: The Rise of Incorporated Transgovernmental Networks’, in I. Tömmel and A. Verdun (eds.) Innovative Governance in the European Union (Boulder, CO: Lynn Rienner).

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzioni, A. (2007) ‘The Community Deficit’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 45(1), 23–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Trade Union Confederation (ETUC) (2006a) ‘Euro-Demonstration on the Services Directive: European Trade Unions Mobilised in Force’, http://www.etuc.org/a/2075, date accessed January 19, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Trade Union Confederation (ETUC) (2006b) ‘A Major Victory for European Workers: The Initial Bolkestein Proposal Is Dead’, http://www.etuc.org/a/2081, date accessed January 19, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fligstein, N. (2008) Euro-Clash: The EU, European Identity, and the Future of Europe (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Føllesdal, A. (2006) ‘The Legitimacy Deficits of the European Union’, Journal of Political Philosophy, 14(4), 441–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Føllesdal, A. and S. Hix (2006) ‘Why There Is a Democratic Deficit in the EU: A Response to Majone and Moravcsik’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 44(3), 533–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, J. (2007) Interest Representation in the European Union, 2nd edn (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Greven, M. T. (2000) ‘Can the European Union Finally Become a Democracy?’ in M. T. Greven and L. W. Pauly (eds.) Democracy Beyond the State: The European Dilemma and the Emerging Global Order (Toronto: University of Toronto Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Haas, E. B. (1958) The Uniting of Europe: Political, Social, and Economic Forces 1950–1957 (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Haas, E. B. (1971) ‘The Study of Regional Integration: Reflections on the Joy and Anguish of Pretheorizing’ in L. N. Lindberg and S. A. Scheingold (eds.) Regional Integration: Theory and Research (Cambridge: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1984/87) The Theory of Communicative Action, 2 vols (Cambridge: Polity Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1998) Die postnationale Konstellation: Politische Essays (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp).

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (2001) The Postnational Constellation: Political Essays (Cambridge: Polity Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidenreich, M. (2006) ‘Die Europäisierung sozialer Ungleichheiten zwischen nationaler Solidarität, europäischer Koordinierung und globalem Wettbewerb’ in M. Heidenreich (ed.) Die Europäisierung sozialer Ungleichheit (Frankfurt: Campus).

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrmann, R. K., T. Risse, and M. B. Brewer (eds.) (2004) Transnational Identities: Becoming European in the EU (Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hix, S. (2005) The Political System of the European Union, 2nd edn (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hix, S. (2006) ‘The European Union as a Polity (I)’, in K. E. Jørgensen, M. A. Pollack, and B. Rosamond (eds.) Handbook of European Union Politics (London: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hix, S. (2008) What’s Wrong with the European Union and How to Fit It (Cambridge: Polity Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, S. (1966) ‘Obstinate or Obsolete? The Fate of the Nation-State and the Case of Western Europe’, Daedalus, 95(3), 862–915.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooghe, L. and G. Marks (2001) Multi-Level Governance and European Integration (Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooghe, L. and G. Marks (2005) ‘Calculation, Community and Cues: Public Opinion on European Integration’, European Union Politics, 6(4), 419–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hooghe, L. and G. Marks (2008) ‘A Postfunctionalist Theory of European Integration: From Permissive Consensus to Constraining Dissensus’, British Journal of Political Science, 39(1), 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jachtenfuchs, M. (2006) ‘The European Union as a Polity (II)’ in K. E. Jørgensen, M. A. Pollack, and B. Rosamond (eds.) Handbook of European Union Politics (London: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessop, B. (2004) The Future of the Capitalist State (Cambridge: Polity Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaelble, H. (2004) ‘Social Particularities of Nineteenth- and Twentieth-Century Europe’ in H. Kaelble (ed.) The European Way: European Societies during the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries (New York: Berghahn).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, W. and P. Starie (eds.) (2005) Transnational European Union: Towards a Common Political Space (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kentor, J. and Y. S. Jang (2004) ‘Yes, There Is a (Growing) Transnational Business Community: A Study of Global Interlocking Directorates 1983–98’, International Sociology, 19(3), 355–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohler-Koch, B. and R. Eising (eds.) (1999) The Transformation of Governance in the European Union (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Koopmans, R. (2007) ‘Who Inhabits the European Public Sphere? Winners and Losers, Supporters and Opponents in Europeanized Political Debates’, European Journal of Political Research, 46(2), 183–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kriesi, H., E. Grande, R. Lachat, M. Dolezal, S. Bornschier, and T. Frey (2008) West European Politics in the Age of Globalization (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lavenex, S. (2009) ‘Transgovernmentalism in the Area of Freedom, Security, and Justice’ in I. Tömmel and A. Verdun (eds.) Innovative Governance in the European Union (Boulder, CO: Lynn Rienner).

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1997) Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp).

    Google Scholar 

  • Majone, G. (1998) ‘Europe’s “Democratic Deficit”: The Question of Standards’, European Law Journal, 4(1), 5–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mann, M. (1998) ‘Is There a Society Called Euro?’ in R. Axtmann (ed.) Globalization and Europe: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations (London: Pinter).

    Google Scholar 

  • Moravcsik, A. (1998) The Choice for Europe: Social Purpose and State Power from Messina to Maastricht (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Moravcsik, A. (2002) ‘In Defence of the “Democratic Deficit”: Reassessing Legitimacy in the European Union’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 40(4), 603–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nye, J. S. and R. O. Keohane (1971) ‘Transnational Relations and World Politics: An Introduction’, International Organization, 25(3), 329–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Risse, T. (2009) ‘Social Constructivism and European Integration’ in A. Wiener and T. Diez (eds.) European Integration Theory, 2nd edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumford, C. (2002) The European Union: A Political Sociology (Oxford: Blackwell).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sabel, C. and J. Zeitlin (2008) ‘Learning from Difference: The New Architecture of Experimental Governance in the EU’, European Law Journal, 14(3), 271–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf, F. W. (2009) ‘Legitimacy and the Multilevel European Polity’, European Political Science Review, 1(2), 173–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitter, P. (2004) ‘Neo-Neofunctionalism’ in A. Wiener and T. Diez (eds.) European Integration Theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shore, C. (2000) Building Europe: The Cultural Politics of European Integration (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stichweh, R. (2000) Die Weltgesellschaft: Soziologische Analysen (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone Sweet, A. and W. Sandholtz (1998) ‘Integration, Supranational Governance, and the Institutionalization of the European Polity’ in W. Sandholtz and A. Stone Sweet (eds.) European Integration and Supranational Governance (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarrow, S. (2001) ‘Contentious Politics in a Composite Polity’ in D. Imig and S. Tarrow (eds.) Contentious Europeans: Protest and Politics in an Emerging Polity (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarrow, S. (2005) The New Transnational Activism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tömmel, I. and A. Verdun (eds.) (2009) Innovative Governance in the European Union: The Politics of Multilevel Policymaking (Boulder, CO: Lynn Rienner).

    Google Scholar 

  • Trenz, H.-J. and K. Eder (2004) ‘The Democratizing Dynamics of a European Public Sphere: Towards a Theory of Democratic Functionalism’, European Journal of Social Theory, 7(1), 5–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vertovec, S. (2009) Transnationalism (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wessler, H., B. Peters, M. Brüggemann, K. Kleinen-von Königslöw, and S. Sifft (2008) Transnationalization of Public Spheres (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wiener, A. and T. Diez (2009) European Integration Theory, 2nd edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2011 Achim Hurrelmann

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hurrelmann, A. (2011). Transnationalism and the Theory of European Integration: Political Science Perspectives. In: DeBardeleben, J., Hurrelmann, A. (eds) Transnational Europe. Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230306370_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics