Skip to main content

Part of the book series: The Holocaust and its Contexts ((HOLC))

  • 127 Accesses

Abstract

Ever since the news of the liberated concentration camps had filled the pages of British newspapers, the majority attitude of the press was that Nazi criminality, including the Final Solution, had to be recorded and remembered. Throughout the summer of 1945, the victorious Allies were wrestling with the question of how the unbelievable scenes, exposed by advancing Allied armies who liberated concentration camps, and the criminality of the Nazi regime that had made them possible, should be investigated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. For example, see Bradley E. Smith, Reaching Judgment at Nuremberg (London: André Deutsch, 1977), pp. 46–73. Sidney Alderman, while meriting the negotiations as successful, commented that the Russians ‘would agree to a matter one day and repudiate the agreement the next’. See Sidney S. Alderman, ‘Negotiating on War Crimes Prosecutions, 1945’, in Raymond Dennett and Joseph E. Johnson (eds), Negotiating with the Russians (Boston: World Peace Foundation, 1951), p. 53.

    Google Scholar 

  2. For the four-power negotiations that finally culminated in the Charter, see, for example, Ann and John Tusa, The Nuremberg Trial (New York: Atheneum, 1986), pp. 50–90; Smith, Reaching Judgment, esp. Chapters 2 and 3; Marrus, The Nuremberg War Crimes Trial, pp. 18–70; and Bloxham, Genocide on Trial, esp. pp. 17–28.

    Google Scholar 

  3. International Military Tribunal (hereafter IMT), Trial of the Major War Criminals before the International Military Tribunal, Nuremberg 14 November 1945–1 October 1942, 42 vols (Nuremberg: International Military Tribunal, 1947), 1, pp. 10–16.

    Google Scholar 

  4. At the beginning of his opening speech, Jackson argued that ‘civilization cannot tolerate their being ignored [crimes of the Nazis], because it cannot survive their being repeated’. IMT 2, p. 99. For a similar point made in the Nordic press, see Antero Holmila, ‘Portraying Genocide: The Nuremberg Trial, the Press in Finland and Sweden and the Holocaust, 1945–46’, Acta Societatis Martensis, 1 (2006), p. 209.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Leon Poliakov, Le Procès de Nuremberg (Paris: Julliárd, 1971), p. 209 cited in Marrus, The Nuremberg War Crimes Trials, p. 192.

    Google Scholar 

  6. For the role of legal processes as didactic and historical instrument, see Martti Koskenniemi, ‘Between Impunity and Show Trials’, Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law, Yearbook, 6 (2002), pp. 1–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. The opening of the Nuremberg trial was reported by about 250 journalists from 11 different countries. See Bloxham, Genocide on Trial, p. 95 and Robert Siegel, Im intresse der Gerechtigkeit. Die Dachauer Kriegsverbrecherprozesse 1945–1948 (Frankfurt am Main: Campus Verlag, 1992), p. 41.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gustav M. Gilbert, Nuremberg Diary (New York: Da Capo Press, 1995), pp. 30–1.

    Google Scholar 

  9. R. W. Cooper, The Nuremberg Trial (Penguin: Harmondsworth, 1947), p. 175.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Richard Overy, Interrogations. The Nazi Elite in Allied Hands, 1945 (London and New York: Allen Lane, the Penguin Press, 2001), p. 149. For an Allied interest in him, see esp. pp. 143–53.

    Google Scholar 

  11. See also Hilary Earl, ‘Scales of Justice: History, Testimony and the Einsatzgruppen Trial at Nuremberg’, in Jeffry Diefendorf (ed.), Lessons and Legacies, Vol. VI: New Currents in Holocaust Research (Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 2005), pp. 325–51.

    Google Scholar 

  12. See also Bloxham, ‘The missing camps of Aktion Reinhard’, in Peter Gray and Kendrick Oliver (eds), The Memory of Catastrophe (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2004), pp. 118–31.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Stig Dagerman, Tysk Höst (Stockholm: P.A. Nordstedt & Söners Förlag, 1947).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Stig Dagerman, German Autumn (London: Quartet Books, 1988), p. 13.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2011 Antero Holmila

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Holmila, A. (2011). Responding to the Nazi Crimes: The British Press and the Nuremberg Trial. In: Reporting the Holocaust in the British, Swedish and Finnish Press, 1945–50. The Holocaust and its Contexts. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230305861_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230305861_5

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-31106-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-230-30586-1

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics