Skip to main content

“Challenging and Alternative”: Screening Queer Girls on Channel 4

  • Chapter
Women on Screen

Abstract

While in the early history of television, lesbians, when present at all, “were only seen as an ‘issue’ — a ‘subject’ up for analysis”, the growth of digital media culture has greatly increased the quantity of televised representations of lesbians, often as recurring characters, or even as series protagonists (Collis 120–21). This mainstreaming of lesbian representations has significant implications for the discourse around lesbian visibility, which has been a major staple of feminist and queer critiques of television over the last several decades. In particular, such mainstreaming offers us the opportunity to explore some of the complex entanglements that surround lesbian visibility, many of which are neglected in critical analyses that imply the polarization of visibility and invisibility, and transgression and containment. Rather than investigating the effects of lesbian visibility “in the media” or “on television”, it is imperative to examine particular trends in representation and to situate these within the wider mediated culture. For example, visibility on a subscription, quality television programme like Showtime’s The L Word (2004–09) surely comes with different costs, and different representational freedoms, than visibility on a network sitcom like Ellen (1994–98). While some of these pressures will be registered in the text, others demand to be theorized on their own terms. Thus, current studies of lesbian visibility need to provide contextualized examinations of texts, which ask what costs, and what freedoms, might be incurred through representation on different media platforms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Works cited

  • Becker, R. Gay TV and Straight America. New Brunswick, NJ and London: Rutgers University Press, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • “Broadcasting Act, 1981”. Office of Public Sector Information. http://www.england-legislation.hmso.gov.uk/RevisedStatutes/Acts/ukpga/1981/cukpga_19810068_en_1. [Accessed June 15, 2009].

  • Bronski, M. “Positive Images and the Coming Out Film: The Art and Politics of Lesbian and Gay Cinema”. Cineaste 26.1 (2000): 20–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M. A Licence to be Different: The Story of Channel 4. London: BFI Publishing, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunsdon, C., and L. Spigel, eds. Feminist Television Criticism: A Reader. 2nd edn. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciasullo, Ann M. “Making Her (In)Visible: Cultural Representations of Lesbianism and the Lesbian Body in the 1990s”. Feminist Studies 27.3 (2001): 577–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collis, Rose. “Screened Out: Lesbians and Television”. Daring to Dissent: Lesbian Culture From Margin to Mainstream. Ed. Liz Gibbs. London: Cassell, 1994. 120–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • “Communications Act, 2003”. Office of Public Sector Information. http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2003/ukpga_20030021_en_1. [Accessed June 15, 2009].

  • Davis, G. “Saying it Out Loud: Revealing Television’s Queer Teens”. Teen TV: Genre, Consumption and Identity. Ed. G. Davis, and K. Dickinson. London: BFI Publishing, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, G., and K. Dickinson, eds. Teen TV: Genre, Consumption and Identity. London: BFI Publishing, 2004. 127–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dow, B. “Ellen, Television and the Politics of Gay and Lesbian Visibility”. Feminist Television Criticism: A Reader. 2nd edn. Ed. C. Brunsdon, and L. Spigel. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press, 2008. 93–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driver, S. Queer Girls and Popular Culture: Reading, Resisting, and Creating Media. New York: Peter Lang, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellen (1994–98). ABC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, R. Gender and the Media. Cambridge, Polity, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gove, B. “Framing Gay Youth”. Screen 37.2 (1996): 174–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobson, D. Channel 4: The Early Years and the Jeremy Isaacs Legacy. IB Tauris: London and New York, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • The L Word (2004–09). Showtime.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lury, K. British Youth Television: Cynicism and Enchantment. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2001.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lygo, K. “Channel 4 Annual Review, 2007”. http://www.channel4.com/about4/programmepolicy.html. [Accessed June 15, 2009].

  • —. “Channel 4 Statement of Promises, 2008”. http://www.channel4.com/about4/programmepolicy.html. [Accessed June 15, 2009].

  • McRobbie, A. “Post-feminism and Popular Culture”. Feminist Media Studies 4.3 (2004): 255–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, M., et al. “The Sopranos as HBO Brand Equity: The Art of Commerce in the Age of Digital Reproduction”. Ed. D. Lavery. This Thing of Ours: Investigating the Sopranos. Columbia University Press: New York, 2002. 42–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skins. E4 and Channel 4 (2007-). 3.4. “Pandora”. Dir. Simon Massey. February 12, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skins. E4 and Channel 4 (2007-). 3.6. “Naomi”. Dir. Simon Massey. February 28, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skins. E4 and Channel 4 (2007-). 3.7. “JJ”. Dir. Charles Martin. March 5, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skins. E4 and Channel 4 (2007-). 3.9. “Katie and Emily”. Dir. Charles Martin. March 19, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugar Rush. Channel 4 (2005–06).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugar Rush. Channel 4 (2005–06). 1.1. Dir. Sean Grundy. June 7, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugar Rush. Channel 4 (2005–06). 1.10. Dir. Harry Bradbeer. August 2, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugar Rush. Channel 4 (2005–06). 2.2. Dir. Harry Bradbeer. June 15, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugar Rush. Channel 4 (2005–06). 2.3. Dir. Harry Bradbeer. June 22, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugar Rush. Channel 4 (2005–06). 2.8. Dir. Philip John. July 20, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Villarejo, A. Lesbian Rule: Cultural Criticism and the Value of Desire. Durham: Duke University Press, 2003.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • “Why Advertise on Channel 4?” Channel 4 Sales. http://www.channel4sales.com/platforms/Channel + 4. [Accessed June 15, 2009].

  • Wolfe, S., and L. Roripaugh “The (In)visible Lesbian: Anxieties of Representation in The L Word”. Ed. C. Brunsdon, and L. Spigel. Feminist Television Criticism: A Reader. 2nd edn. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press, 2008. 211–18.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2011 Martin Zeller-Jacques

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Zeller-Jacques, M. (2011). “Challenging and Alternative”: Screening Queer Girls on Channel 4. In: Waters, M. (eds) Women on Screen. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230301979_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics