Skip to main content

Film Can’t Philosophise (and Neither Can Philosophy): Introduction to a Non-Philosophy of Cinema

  • Chapter
New Takes in Film-Philosophy

Abstract

Giorgio Agamben and the films of Tony Scott; Emmanuel Levinas and the films of Michael Haneke; Jean-Luc Nancy and Claire Denis; Slavoj Žižek and Kieslowski; Gilles Deleuze and Godard (or Alain Badiou and Godard, Jacques Derrida and Godard, Jean-François Lyotard and Godard). Linkages come readily to mind for a philosophically-inclined viewer when looking at certain kinds of film. When Michael Haneke’s Caché (France, 2005), for example, finally reveals who is the blackmailer, who is filming the guilty, with the answer, ‘no one’, some cannot help but think of Levinas. His idea of a universal responsibility before the Other that comes with human existence as such, seems to chime with Caché’s refusal to apportion the usual roles of good and bad, yet without at the same time denying that a terrible wrong has occurred. To exist before another is to be guilty, to be responsible for that Other’s life. No one is guilty because every one is guilty.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bergson, H., 1977. The Two Sources of Morality and Religion, translated by R. A. Audra and C. Brereton, with the assistance of W. Horsfall Carter. Notre Dame: Notre Dame University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, F.H., 1993. The Presuppositions of Critical History and Aphorisms, with a new introduction by Guy Stock. Bristol: Thoemmes Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frampton, D., 2006. Filmosophy. London: Wallflower Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, W., 1996. Adventures in the Screen Trade: A Personal View of Hollywood and Screenwriting, 2nd rev. edn. London: Abacus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodenough, J., 2005. ‘Introduction I: A Philosopher Goes to the Cinema’. In R. Read, and J. Goodenough, eds. Film as Philosophy: Essays on Cinema after Wittgenstein and Cavell. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M., 1968. What is Called Thinking? Translated by J. Glenn Gray and F. Wieck, with an introduction by J. Glenn Gray. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaprow, A., 2003. Essays on the Blurring of Art and Life, expanded edition. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laruelle, F., 1996. Principes de la Non-Philosophie. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mai, J., 2009. ‘Review of John Mullarkey, Refractions of Reality: Philosophy and the Moving Image’. In Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews, [online] http://ndpr.nd.edu/review.cfm?id=16386. 26 June 2009. Available at: .

    Google Scholar 

  • McGettigan, A., 2009. ‘Molls: Review of John Mullarkey, Refractions of Reality: Philosophy and the Moving Image’ in Radical Philosophy, no.158, November/ December, pp.66–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullarkey, J., 2006. Post-Continental Philosophy: An Outline. London: Continuum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullarkey, J., 2009. Refractions of Reality: Philosophy and the Moving Image, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rushton, R., 2010. ‘Review of John Mullarkey, Refractions of Reality: Philosophy and the Moving Image’, Refractions of Reality: Philosophy and the Moving Image’, in The Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, vol. 14, no. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinnerbrink, R., 2009. ‘Fabulations of Reality: John Mullarkey’s Non-Philosophy of Film’, paper delivered at the University of Dundee, 6 October 2009.

    Google Scholar 

Filmography

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2011 John Mullarkey

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mullarkey, J. (2011). Film Can’t Philosophise (and Neither Can Philosophy): Introduction to a Non-Philosophy of Cinema. In: Carel, H., Tuck, G. (eds) New Takes in Film-Philosophy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230294851_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics