Abstract
‘Immature poets imitate; mature poets steal’, T.S. Eliot said in a renowned aphorism (1928 [1920]: 125). Eliot’s distinction between imitation and theft identifies rewriting as a highly ambiguous practice that stands at the heart of the art and craft of writing: it is at once what writers do and should not do, or should not be seen to be doing, or do not want to acknowledge as having done. Pointing to a complex relationship between rewriting and plagiarism, Eliot’s aphorism suggests the distinction may be less obvious and tenable than its pithiness implies, troubling the opposition between good and bad, mature and immature.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2011 Liedeke Plate
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Plate, L. (2011). Women’s Rewriting as Counter-memory: An ABC of ‘Stolentelling’ (Authorship, Branding, and Copyright). In: Transforming Memories in Contemporary Women’s Rewriting. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230294639_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230294639_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-31255-9
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-29463-9
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)