Abstract
One of the most novel and striking features of the immediate post-war world was the emphasis placed on the concept of universal human rights as the basis for a new and more secure world order. The highest embodiment of this principle was the signing of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) by 48 states2 on 10 December 1948. However, the UDHR represented a last gasp of international agreement and its impact was swiftly stifled by the onset of the Cold War. Harold Laski, the British socialist and political scientist, had warned quite properly in 1947 that the Declaration may become another Kellogg-Briand Pact, ‘introduced with an enthusiasm only surpassed by the contempt with which it was ignored by its signatories’.3 Indeed, a combination of Realpolitik and the apparently irreconcilable conceptions of human rights across the Cold War divide ensured that no further progress could be made internationally towards creating a regime to safeguard such rights until the mid-1960s. Instead, the most immediate practical steps in this regard were taken at the ‘European’ level through the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (ECHR) signed in November 1950, and subsequently through its associated commission and court. Although somewhat neglected at the time and slow to develop in efficacy, the Convention has become a landmark in the emergence of Europe as a realm of legally enforceable human rights.4
Whatever the theory, [Western conceptions of human rights in practice] often applied only to Europeans, and sometimes to only some among the Europeans. (Humayun Kabir, 1947)1
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
See Geoffrey Marston, ‘The United Kingdom’s part in the preparation of the European Convention on Human Rights, 1950’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, XLII 4, October 1993, 812–13.
Mikael Rask Madsen, ‘From Cold War instrument to supreme European court: The European Court of Human Rights at the crossroads of international and national law and politics’, Law & Social Inquiry, XXXII, 1, 137–59, Winter 2007.
Andrew Moravcsik, ‘The origins of human rights regimes: Democratic delegation in postwar Europe’, International Organization, LIV 2, Spring 2000, 217–52.
See Robert Burstow, ‘The limits of Modernist Art as a “Weapon of the Cold War”: Reassessing the unknown patron of the Monument to the Unknown Political Prisoner’, Oxford Art Journal, XX, 1, 1997, 68–80.
See Tom Buchanan, ‘“The truth will set you free”: The making of Amnesty International’, Journal of Contemporary History, XXXVII, 4, (2002), 575–97.
See Tom Buchanan, ‘Amnesty International in crisis, 1966–1967’, Twentieth Century British History, XV, 3, (2004), 267–89.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2010 T. Buchanan
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Buchanan, T. (2010). Human Rights, the Memory of War and the Making of a ‘European’ Identity, 1945–75. In: Conway, M., Patel, K.K. (eds) Europeanization in the Twentieth Century. The Palgrave Macmillan Transnational History Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230293120_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230293120_8
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-31307-5
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-29312-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)