Abstract
In the Hittite treaties, foreign countries are either enemies (nakru)1 or friends/allies (salmu). Only those integrated into the Hittite political system by a formal pact fall into the second category; if they ‘rebel’, they too become enemies. To the group of enemies belong ‘Hurri, Misri (= Egypt), Karduniash (= Babylonia), Ashtata, Alshe, and every enemy country close to the border of your (= the vassal’s) land, which is enemy of the Hatti land’. To the friends/allies belongs ‘every country close to the border of your land, which is an ally of the Hatti land — Mukish, Qadesh, Nuhashe — but rebels and becomes enemy of the Hatti land’.2 The act of rebellion is here expressed by the verb saharu (‘to change direction’), with the same implications that we have already seen for nabalkutu (‘to transgress’) in the middle-Assyrian royal inscriptions (Chapter 12).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2001 Mario Liverani
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Liverani, M. (2001). Peace as Mutual Recognition. In: International Relations in the Ancient Near East, 1600–1100 BC. Studies in Diplomacy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230286399_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230286399_19
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-41439-0
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-28639-9
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)