Abstract
[A]nalytical and thinking reading is likely to be close to literary criticism or interpretation (the institutional prerogatives are designed to encourage analysis and thought); but is not necessarily so. Literary criticism or interpretation may also be weak in analysis and thinkingness, may be constructed on questionable premises, may have contradictory or limited methodologies that dilute its analytical qualities. Such interpretation or criticism may be unthinking too, and become unthinkingly participant in the social and political effect in question (thus transferring the institutional credentials to that effect, making it that much stronger). This ...has actually been the case with regard to the Harry Potter books.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Tzvetan Todorov, Genres in Discourse, trans. Catherine Porter (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990/1978), pp. 17–18.
Tzvetan Todorov, The Fantastic: A Structural Approach to a Literary Genre, trans. Richard Howard (Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press, 1973/1970), p. 23.
Herbert Marcuse, One-Dimensional Man (London: Sphere, 1964).
Andrew Blake, The Irresistible Rise of Harry Potter (London: Verso, 2002), pp. 17–19.
Jacqueline Rose, The Case of Peter Pan or The Impossibility of Children’s Fiction (Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1984), pp. 1–2.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2009 Suman Gupta
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gupta, S. (2009). Children’s Literature. In: Re-Reading Harry Potter. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230279711_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230279711_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-230-21958-8
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-27971-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)