Abstract
In this chapter, I reflect upon institutional speech acts: those that make claims ‘about’ an institution, or ‘on behalf’ of an institution. Such speech acts involve acts of naming: the institution is named, and in being ‘given’ a name, the institution is also ‘given’ attributes, qualities, and even a character. By speech acts I include not just spoken words, but writing, as well as visual images, all the materials that give an institution an interiority, as if it has a face, as well as feelings, thoughts or judgments. They might say: ‘the university regrets’, or just simply ‘we regret’. More specifically, in this chapter, I examine documents that are authorized by institutions (such as race equality policies, which are often signed by say the VC on behalf of an institution), make claims about the institution (for instance, by describing the institution as having certain qualities, such as being diverse), or point toward future action (by committing an institution to a course of action, such as diversity or equality, which in turn might involve the commitment of resources).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Ahmed, S. (2000) Strange Encounters: Embodied Others in Post-coloniality, London: Routledge.
Ahmed, S. and E. Swan (2006) ‘Introduction: Doing Diversity’, Policy Futures in Education, 4(2): pp. 1–10.
Austin, J.L. (1975) aaaaa How to Do Things with Words, J.O. Urmson and M. Sbisà (eds.), Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Benschop, Y. (2001) ‘Pride, Prejudice and Performance’, International Journal of Human Resources Management, 12(7): pp. 1166–81.
Blackmore, J. and J. Sachs (2003) ‘Managing Equity Work in the Performative University’. Australian Feminist Studies, 18(41): pp. 141–62.
Butler, J. (1993) Bodies That Matter: On the Discursive Limits of ‘Sex’, New York: Routledge.
Deem, R. and J. Ozga (1997) ‘Women Managing Diversity in a Postmodern World’, in C. Marshall (ed.) Feminist Critical Policy Analysis, London: Falmer.
Kandola, B. and J. Fullerton (1994) Managing the Mosaic: Diversity in Action, London: IPD.
Kirton, J. and A.M. Greene (2000) The Dynamics of Managing Diversity, Oxford: Butterworth: Heinemann.
Lorbiecki, A. (2001) ‘Changing Views on Diversity Management’, Management Studies, 32(3): pp. 345–61.
Mirza, H. (2009) Race, Gender and Educational Desire, London: Taylor and Francis.
Pai, H-H. (2005) ‘Anxiety in the UK’, The Guardian, February 8.
Power, M. (1994) The Audit Explosion, London: Demos.
Shore, C. and Wright, S. (2000) ‘Coercive Accountability: The Rise of Audit Culture in Higher Education’, in M. Strathern (ed.) Audit Cultures: Anthropological Studies in Accountability, Ethics and the Academy, London: Routledge, pp. 57–89.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2009 Sara Ahmed
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ahmed, S. (2009). Commitment as a Nonperformative. In: Fırat, B.Ö., De Mul, S., van Wichelen, S. (eds) Commitment and Complicity in Cultural Theory and Practice. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230236967_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230236967_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-30743-2
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-23696-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social & Cultural Studies CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)