Skip to main content

Conclusion: Kin-State Nationalism and Diaspora Politics in Eastern Europe

  • Chapter
Between State and Nation
  • 148 Accesses

Abstract

This book has shown that diaspora policies are driven primarily by the domestic political strategies of kin-state elites, challenging the notion that ethnic affiliation across borders is the primary driver of state action toward ethnic kin in other states. Kin-state action on behalf of ethnic diasporas, including incendiary remarks and diplomatic retaliation toward neighboring countries, cannot be seen simply as responses to the plight of ethnic kin. As the case of Hungary shows, an evaluation of the situation of coethnics in neighboring states is not an objective assessment made by kin-state politicians, but a subjective construction that maps quite closely to political affiliation. Actions taken by Hungary were often justified by the ties of ethnic kinship, but were driven primarily by domestic political strategy. Chapters 2 through 5 offered multiple episodes demonstrating how elites utilized the state’s relationship with the ethnic Hungarians across the border as a political resource to further their own strategic goals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Tim Snyder, “The Poles: Western Aspirations, Eastern Minorities,” in Nations Abroad: Diaspora Politics and International Relations in the Former Soviet Union, ed. Charles King and Neil J. Melvin Boulder. CO; Oxford, UK: Westview Press, 1998), 185.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Stephen R. Burant, “International Relations in a Regional Context: Poland and its Eastern Neighbours,” Europe-Asia Studies 45, no. 3 (1993): 397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dariusz Fedor, “Another Repatriation from Soviet Union Possible,” Polish News Bulletin, May 20, 1991, http://www.lexisnexis.com.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Agata Görny, et al, “Selective Tolerance? Regulations, Practice and Discussions Regarding Dual Citizenship in Poland,” in Dual Citizenship in Europe: From Nationhood to Societal Integration, ed. Thomas Faist (Hampshire, UK: Ashgate, 2007), 147–169.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Stephen M. Saideman and R. William Ayres, For Kin or Country: Xenophobia, Nationalism, and War (New York: Columbia University Press, 2008), 141.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Constantin Iordachi, “Politics of Citizenship in Post-Communist Romania: Legal Traditions, Restitution of Nationality and Multiple Memberships,” in Citizenship Policies in the New Europe, ed. Rainer Baubock, Bernhard Perchning, and Weibke Sievers (Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2009), 188.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Irina Culic, “Eluding Exit and Entry Controls: Romanian and Moldovan Immigrants in the European Union,” East European Politics and Societies 11, no. 1 (Winter 2008): 165.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Vladimir Socor, “Moldova Refuses Mass Conferral of Romanian Citizenship,” Eurasia Daily Monitor, 4, no. 48 (March 9, 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Christian Iordachi, “Dual Citizenship and Policies Towards Kin Minorities in East-Central Europe,” in The Hungarian Status Law: Nation Building and/or Minority Protection, ed. Kántor, et al. (Sapporo, Japan: Slavic Research Center, Hokkaido University, 2004), 250.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ryan Kennedy, “Moldova: An EU Invasion Waiting To Happen,” RFE-RL Newsline, February 1, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Graham Smith, “Transnational Politics and the Politics of the Russian Diaspora,” Ethnic and Racial Studies 22, no. 3 (May 1999): 508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Igor Zevelev, Russia and Its New Diasporas (Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press, 2001), 69–74; Smith, “Transnational Politics and the Politics of the Russian Diaspora,” 507; Saideman and Ayres, For Kin or Country, 175–177.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sergei Blagov, “New Fears Arise over Repatriation of Ethnic Russians,” Asia Times, October 23, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Igor Torbakov, “Kremlin Calls on Compatriots to Come Back to Mother Russia,” Eurasia Daily Monitor 3, no. 129 (February 19, 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Paul Goble, “Moscow’s Program for the Repatriation of Compatriots Collapses,” Window on Eurasia, June 11, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Peter Roudik, “Russia: Legal Aspects of War in Georgia,” The Law Library of Congress, September 2008: 9–11.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Charles King and Neil J. Melvin, “Diaspora Politics: Ethnic Linkages, Foreign Policy, and Security in Eurasia,” International Security 24, no. 3 (1999): 134–137.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Zsuzsa Csergő’ and James M. Goldgeier, “Virtual Nationalism,” Foreign Policy 125 (2001): 76–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Maria Koinova, “Kinstate Intervention in Ethnic Conflicts: Albania and Turkey Compared,” Ethnopolitics 7, no. 4 (2008): 375–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Erin Jenne, Ethnic Bargaining: The Paradox of Minority Empowerment (Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 2007), 2–10.

    Google Scholar 

  21. See Zeynep Kadirbeyoglu, “Changing Conceptions of Citizenship in Turkey,” in Citizenship Policies in the New Europe, ed. Rainer Baubock, Bernhard Perchning, and Weibke Sievers (Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2009), 293–311.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rey Koslowski has called this the “commodification of citizenship.” See “Challenges of International Cooperation in a World of Increasing Dual Nationality,” in Rights and Duties of Dual Nationals: Evolution and Prospects, ed. Kay Heilbronner and David Martin, (The Hague: Kluwer Law, 2003), 157–182.

    Google Scholar 

  23. David Fitzgerald, “Rethinking Emigrant Citizenship,” New York University Law Review 81, no. 11 (April 2006): 105.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Robert C. Smith, “Diasporic Membership in Historical Perspective: Comparative Insights from the Mexican, Italian and Polish Cases,” International Migration Review 37, no. 4 (2003): 728.

    Google Scholar 

  25. See Anna Grzymata-Busse and Abby Innes, “Great Expectations: The EU and Domestic Political Competition in East Central Europe,” East European Politics and Society 17, no. 1 (2003): 64–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Zsuzsa Csergó’ and James M. Goldgeier, “Nationalist Strategies and European Integration,” Perspectives on Politics 2, no. 1 (2004): 21–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Czech News Agency, “New Party Wants to Attract Ethnic Hungarians, Slovaks,” June 9, 2009, http://www.lexisnexis.com.

    Google Scholar 

  28. George Schöpflin, “Hungary as Kin State,” in Minority Policy in Eastern and Central Europe: The Link Between Domestic Policy, Foreign Policy and European Integration, ed. Katlijn Malfliet (Leuven: Garant, 1998), 36.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2010 Myra A. Waterbury

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Waterbury, M.A. (2010). Conclusion: Kin-State Nationalism and Diaspora Politics in Eastern Europe. In: Between State and Nation. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230117310_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics