Skip to main content
  • 149 Accesses

Abstract

When the delegates to the constitutional convention met in Philadelphia over the summer of 1787, the government they envisioned to replace the failed confederacy was one of enlarged but limited powers. Among the innovations to effectuate that vision was the creation of an Executive Magistracy endowed with broad powers to see to the faithful execution of the laws enacted by the bicameral congress. These powers would be centered in one individual, the newly created President of the United States.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Ibid., 33–34; Richard M. Pius, “Impeaching the President: The Intersection of Constitutional and Popular Law,” St. Louis Law Journal, (1999) vol. 43: 871

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kurland, Watergate and the Convention, 111–112; Daniel H. Pollitt, “Sex in the Oval Office and Cover-Up under Oath: Impeachable Offense?” North Carolina Law Review (1998) vol. 77:262

    Google Scholar 

  3. Judge Pickering was removed on the basis of his insanity despite his incapacity to form the mens rea required for criminality. Judge Humphreys was removed in 1862 for his support of the armed rebellion against the United States. Judge Swayne was removed for having obtained funds from the United States by false pretense, despite his counsel’s argument that only acts “in the actual administration of justice” would support impeachment. David Y. Thomas, “The Law of Impeachment in the United States,” American Political Science Review (1908) vol. 2: 381–382.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Frank O. Browman and Stephen L. Sepinuck, “High Crimes and Misdemeanors”: Defining the Constitutional Limits on Presidential Impeachment, Southern California Law Review, vol. 72 (1999) 1532.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2010 H. Lowell Brown

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Brown, H.L. (2010). Conclusion. In: High Crimes and Misdemeanors in Presidential Impeachment. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230102255_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics