Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Roles of the Corporate Level in the Internationalization Process of the Firm

  • Chapter
Creating Value through International Strategy

  • 233 Accesses

Abstract

After many years of abundant research in corporate strategy, the issue of whether and how the corporate level contributes to competitive advantage still raises strong controversies. An important stream of work aims at identifying the sources of corporate performance by isolating company, industry and corporate effects on this variable (Schmalensee 1985; Rumelt 1991; McGahan and Porter 1997). These contributions concluded that corporate effects appeared to be negligible. However, this ’truth’ of strategic management has been challenged by recent findings (Brush and Bromiley 1997, Chang and Singh 2000; Bowman and Helfat 2001), leading to the conclusion that studies within this tradition appear to be strongly affected by apparent and difficult to fix sampling biases and methodological flaws (Brush and Bromiley 1997; Chang and Singh 2000; Bowman and Helfat 2001).

We gratefully acknowledge support for this research from IESE Business School’s Anselmo Rubiralta Center on Globalization and Strategy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Amram, M. and N. Kulatilaka (1999) Real Options. Managing Strategic Investment in an Uncertain World (Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowman, E. and C. Helfat (2001) ‘Does Corporate Strategy Matter?’, Strategic Management Journal, 22, 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. and K. Eisenhardt (1998) Competing on the Edge: Strategy as Structured Chaos (Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brush, T. and P. Bromiley (1997) ‘What Does a Small Corporate Effect Mean? A Variance Components Simulation of Corporate and Business Effects’, Strategic Management Journal, 18, 825–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caldart, A. and J. E. Ricart (2004) ‘Corporate Strategy Revisited: A View From Complexity Theory’, European Management Review, 1, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, S. and H. Singh (2000) ‘Corporate and Industry Effects on Business Unit Competitive Position’, Strategic Management Journal, 21, 739–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cyert, R. and J. March (1963) A Behavioural Theory of the Firm (Malden, MA: Blackwell Business).

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. and S. Brown (1999) ‘Patching, Restitching business portfolio in dynamic Markets’, Harvard Business Review, 77(3), 72–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. and D. Sull (2001) ‘Strategy as Simple Rules’, Harvard Business Review, 78(1), 107–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiol, C. and A. Huff (1992) ‘Maps for Managers: Where are We? Where do We Go From Here?’, Journal of Management Studies, 29, 267–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galunic and K. Eisenhardt (2001) ‘Architecture Innovation and Modular Corporate Forms’, Academy of Management Journal, 44(6), 1229–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gavetti, G. and D. Levinthal (2000) ‘Looking Forward and Looking Backward: Cognitive and Experiential Search’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 45, 113–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghemawat, P. and J. E. Ricart (1993) ‘The Organizational Tension Between Static and Dynamic Efficiency’, Strategic Management Journal, 14, 59–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, M. and J. Freeman (1977) ‘The Population Ecology of Organizations’, American Journal of Sociology, 82, 929–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hax, A. and N. Majluf (1985) The Strategy Concept and Process: A Pragmatic Approach, (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall).

    Google Scholar 

  • Helfat, C. and K. Eisenhardt (2001) ‘Inter-Temporal Economies of Scope, Organizational Modularity and the Dynamics of Diversification’, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Strategic Management Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman, S. (1993) The Origins of Order, (New York: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinthal, D. (1991) ‘Organizational Adaptation and Environmental Selection: Interrelated Processes of Change’, Organization Science, 2, 140–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — (1997) ‘Adaptation in Rugged Fitness Landscapes’, Management Science, 43, 934–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levinthal, D. and M. Warglien (1999) ‘Landscape Design: Designing for Local Action in Complex Worlds’, Organization Science, 10, 342–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levitt, B. and J. March (1988) ‘Organizational Learning’, Annual Review of Sociology, 14, 319–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March, J. and H. Simon (1958) Organizations (New York: John Wiley).

    Google Scholar 

  • McGahan, A. and M. Porter (1997) ‘How Much does Industry Matter, Really?’, Strategic Management Journal, 18, 15–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKelvey, B. (1997) ‘Quasi-Natural Organization Science’, Organization Science, 8, 352–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKelvey, B. (1999) ‘Avoiding Complexity Catastrophe in Coevolutionary Pockets: Strategies for Rugged Landscapes’, Organization Science, 10, 294–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H., B. Ahlstrand and J. Lampel (1998) Strategy Safari: A Guided Tour through the Wilds of Strategic Management (London: Prentice-Hall).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. and S. Winter (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. (Cambridge, MA: Bellknap Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. (1980) Competitive Strategy. Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors, (New York: Free Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C. and R. Bettis (1986) ‘The Dominant Logic: A New Linkage between Diversity and Performance’, Strategic Management Journal, 7, 485–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rumelt, R. (1991) ‘How Much does Industry Matter?’, Strategic Management Journal, 12, 167–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmalensee, R. (1985) ‘Econometric Diagnosis of Competitive Localization’, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 3, 57–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sewell, Wright (1931) ‘Evolution in Mendelian Populations’, Genetics, 16: 97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trigeorgis, L. (1996) Real Options: Managerial Flexibility and Strategy in Resource Allocation, (Boston, MA: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, J. (1995) ‘Managerial and Organizational Cognition: Notes from a Trip Down Memory Lane’, Organization Science, 6, 280–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Ádrian Atilio Caldart
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Joan E. Ricart
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. IESE Business School, University of Navarra, Spain

    Africa Ariño (Associate Professor of General Management) & Joan E. Ricart (Associate Dean for Research and the Doctoral Programme, and Chairman of the General Management Department) (Associate Professor of General Management) &  (Associate Dean for Research and the Doctoral Programme, and Chairman of the General Management Department)

  2. Harvard University’s Graduate School of Business Administration, USA

    Pankaj Ghemawat (Jaime and Josefina Chua Tiampo Professor of Business Administration and Head of the Strategy Unit) (Jaime and Josefina Chua Tiampo Professor of Business Administration and Head of the Strategy Unit)

Copyright information

© 2004 Ádrian Atilio Caldart and Joan E. Ricart

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Caldart, Á.A., Ricart, J.E. (2004). The Roles of the Corporate Level in the Internationalization Process of the Firm. In: Ariño, A., Ghemawat, P., Ricart, J.E. (eds) Creating Value through International Strategy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230005563_18

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation