Abstract
Common misconceptions regarding the nature of science are often reinforced in American classrooms. Here, we present an accurate description of the nature of science and discuss at what points in this construct misconceptions often originate. We explore the cultural conflicts related to these misconceptions, and then begin to examine how these apply to outreach. Misconceptions are notably difficult to correct, in part because individuals can often hold their understanding of science so deeply and fundamentally that they find it difficult even to imagine that their ideas might be wrong. Effective strategies for education about misconceptions, including helping individuals to identify and change their misconceptions, are described.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Abd-El-Khalick, F., et al. (2017) A longitudinal analysis of the extent and manner of representations of nature of science in US high school biology and physics textbooks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 54(1): 82–120.
- 2.
Walls, L. (2012) Third grade African America students’ views of the nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 49(1): 1–37.
- 3.
Radloff, J. (2016) On teaching the nature of science: perspectives and resources. Cultural Studies of Science Education 11: 527–538.
- 4.
Melfi, T. (2016) Hidden Figures.
- 5.
MacPhearson, J., & Kelly, S. (2011) Creativity and positive schizotypy influence the conflict between science and religion. Personality and Individual Differences 50: 446–450.
- 6.
Bartos, S. (2014) Teacher’s knowledge structures for nature of science and scientific inquiry: conceptions and classroom practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 51(9): 1150–1184.
- 7.
McDonald, C. (2010) The influence of explicit nature of science and argumentation instruction on preservice primary teachers’ views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 47(9): 1137–1164.
- 8.
United Nations. (2015) Paris Agreement, English Language Text. http://unfccc.int/files/essential_background/convention/application/pdf/english_paris_agreement.pdf. Accessed online 1/22/2018.
- 9.
Thomas, C., et al. (2004) Extinction risk from climate change. Nature 427: 145–148.
- 10.
AAAS. (2014) What We Know. www.whatweknow.aaas.org. Accessed 1/22/2018.
- 11.
Uscinski, J., Douglas, K., & Lewandowsky, S. (2017) Climate change conspiracy theories. Climate Science. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228620.013.328
- 12.
Kahan, D. (2017) ‘Ordinary science intelligence’: a science-comprehension measure for study of risk and science communication, with notes on evolution and climate change. Journal of Risk Research 20(8): 995–1016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2016.1148067
- 13.
Falk, J., & Needham, M. (2011) Measuring the impact of a science center on its community. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 48(1): 1–12.
- 14.
Long, D. (2010) Scientists at play in the field of the Lord. Cultural Studies of Science Education 5: 213–235.
- 15.
Navid, E., & Einsiedel, E. (2012) Synthetic biology in the science café: what have we learned about public engagement? Journal of Science Communication. 11(04) A02.
- 16.
Falk, J., & Needham, M. (2011) Measuring the impact of a science center on its community. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 40(1): 1–12.
- 17.
Norton, M., & Nohara, K. (2009) Science cafes. Cross-cultural adaptation and educational applications. Journal of Science Communication 08(04) A01.
- 18.
National Science Board. (2016) Science and Engineering Indicators 2016. National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics, Arlington, VA.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Schoerning, E. (2018). Nature of Science Misconceptions: A Source of Cultural Conflict. In: Science Culture, Language, and Education in America. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95813-9_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95813-9_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-95812-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-95813-9
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)