Skip to main content

Literary Darwinism: Can Evolution Explain Great Literature?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Human Nature and the Limits of Darwinism

Abstract

The most-developed area of evolutionary aesthetics is the field known as Literary Darwinism: the use of evolutionary principles to explain literature. This chapter examines three examples of Literary Darwinism: evolutionary analyses of Flaubert’s Madame Bovary, of Wilde’s The Picture of Dorian Gray, and Homer’s Iliad. We demonstrate that an evolutionary approach misses out on everything that is most important about these classic works of literature. A careful analysis of these works shows that in fact each of them endorses the traditional theory of human nature, as both a biological and a spiritual being.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Gottschall, The Literary Animal, xvii.

  2. 2.

    Ibid. xxvi.

  3. 3.

    Barash, Madame Bovary’s Ovaries, 9.

  4. 4.

    Gottschall, The Literary Animal, 225.

  5. 5.

    Ibid., 149.

  6. 6.

    Ibid., 201.

  7. 7.

    Ibid., 103.

  8. 8.

    Ibid., 11.

  9. 9.

    Ibid., 66–7.

  10. 10.

    Barash, Madame Bovary’s Ovaries, 8.

  11. 11.

    Ibid., 3.

  12. 12.

    Ibid., 5.

  13. 13.

    Ibid., 4.

  14. 14.

    Ibid., 8.

  15. 15.

    Ibid., 10.

  16. 16.

    Ibid., 101.

  17. 17.

    Ibid., 105.

  18. 18.

    Ibid., 103.

  19. 19.

    Ibid., 107.

  20. 20.

    Ibid., 118.

  21. 21.

    Ibid., 114.

  22. 22.

    Ibid., 116.

  23. 23.

    Ibid., 104, 107.

  24. 24.

    Ibid., 129.

  25. 25.

    Ibid., 211.

  26. 26.

    Ibid., 132.

  27. 27.

    Carroll, Reading Human Nature, 81.

  28. 28.

    Ibid., 91–108.

  29. 29.

    Ibid., 96.

  30. 30.

    Ibid., 99.

  31. 31.

    Ibid., 103.

  32. 32.

    Ibid., 104.

  33. 33.

    Ibid., 107.

  34. 34.

    Ibid., 108.

  35. 35.

    Ibid., 107.

  36. 36.

    Ibid., 99.

  37. 37.

    One might also worry about the use of the term “aesthetic” as a synonym for sensual, revealing Carroll’s own reductionist assumptions.

  38. 38.

    Gottschall, “The Way We Live Our Lives.”

  39. 39.

    Gottschall, The Literary Animal, xix.

  40. 40.

    Ibid., 160.

  41. 41.

    Gottschall, The Rape of Troy, 2.

  42. 42.

    Ibid., 57–58.

  43. 43.

    Ibid., 3.

  44. 44.

    Ibid., 4.

  45. 45.

    Ibid., 55.

  46. 46.

    Ibid., 162.

  47. 47.

    Ibid., 4. It is not clear what he means by “tantalizing” here; presumably only one seeking a Darwinian explanation would be tantalized by such a possibility.

  48. 48.

    Ibid., 128.

  49. 49.

    Ibid., 138.

  50. 50.

    Dowden, The Uses of Greek Mythology, 69–70.

  51. 51.

    See, e.g. Nagy, Best of the Achaeans, 116.

  52. 52.

    E.g. Murray 1967, 267.

  53. 53.

    Homer, Iliad 3:155.

  54. 54.

    Murray, Rise of the Greek Epic, 205.

  55. 55.

    Nagy, Greek Mythology and Poetics, 256.

  56. 56.

    Cf. Whitman, Homer and the Heroic Tradition, 142.

  57. 57.

    Nagy, Best of the Achaeans, 220.

  58. 58.

    Dowden, The Uses of Greek Mythology, 111.

  59. 59.

    Whitman, Homer and the Heroic Tradition, 220.

  60. 60.

    At least from the perspective of the Iliad; the Odyssey of course portrays Odysseus as a heroic character. Nonetheless, the traditional conception of Odysseus as a coward persisted throughout antiquity.

  61. 61.

    Cf. Schein, The Moral Hero, 62.

  62. 62.

    Gottschall, The Rape of Troy, 162.

  63. 63.

    Ibid.

  64. 64.

    Ibid.

  65. 65.

    Ibid., 162.

  66. 66.

    Gottschall of course gets this wrong: in the Chain of Being conception, man is at the middle, not the top.

  67. 67.

    Ibid., 4, 141.

  68. 68.

    Pinker, How the Mind Works, 541.

  69. 69.

    Barash and Barash, Madame Bovary’s Ovaries, 5.

  70. 70.

    Gottschall and Wilson, The Literary Animal, 11.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kaufman, W.R.P. (2016). Literary Darwinism: Can Evolution Explain Great Literature?. In: Human Nature and the Limits of Darwinism. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59288-0_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics