Abstract
At the heart of the traditional conception of human nature is the idea of free will, that is, man’s capacity to choose whether to be guided by the animal side of his nature or to have reason rule the lower passions. It has, however, become a commonplace among scientists that free will must be an illusion. In this chapter, we show why the arguments made against free will are misguided. There is no reason to believe that science has raised any serious doubt about our capacity to deliberate and choose based on reason. Indeed, science itself presupposes just such a rational capacity.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kaufman, W.R.P. (2016). Does Science Refute Free Will?. In: Human Nature and the Limits of Darwinism. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59288-0_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59288-0_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-59287-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-59288-0
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)