Skip to main content

Therapy, Democracy and the Creative Practice of Digital Storytelling

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Digital Storytelling

Abstract

Thumim returns to the assumption prevalent in much theoretical scholarship in which the practice of Digital Storytelling (DS) is understood as most valuable if it can be understood as functioning to democratise media spaces. Therapeutic outcomes are sometimes seen as at best better than nothing and at worst reactionary - often understood as serving individual self-improvement in opposition to a more widely conceived social good. Thumim analyses practices featured in Dunford/Jenkins (2017), Digital Storytelling Form and Content through this lens and concludes that contemporary DS practices are much more than either democratic or therapeutic. She adds the concept of creativity to the mix and argues the essays in this collection demonstrate how the three combine in a unique productive tension within Digital Storytelling.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Couldry, N. (2010). Why voice matters: Culture and politics after neoliberalism. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dovey, J., & Rose, M. (2013). This great mapping of ourselves: New documentary forms online. In B. Winston, (Ed.). The documentary film book. Palgrave. ISBN 9781844573417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, L. (2016). (Submitted to Media, Culture and Society) Exploring public relations as a path to voice and recognition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gergen, K. (2009). An invitation to social construction. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartley, J., & McWilliam, K. (Eds.). (2009). Story circle: Digital storytelling around the World. Malden, MA: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hesmondhalgh, D., & Baker, S. (2011). Creative labour: Media work in three cultural industries. Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Illouz, E. (2007). Cold intimacies: The making of emotional capitalism. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundby, K. (Ed.). (2008). Digital storytelling, mediatized stories: Self-representations in new media. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverstone, R. (2007). Media and morality. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thumim, N. (2010). Self-representations in museums: Therapy or democracy? Critical Discourse Studies, 7(4), 291–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thumim, N. (2012). Self representation and digital culture. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R. (1961/1965). The long revolution. London: Chatto and Windus.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nancy Thumim .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Thumim, N. (2017). Therapy, Democracy and the Creative Practice of Digital Storytelling. In: Dunford, M., Jenkins, T. (eds) Digital Storytelling . Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59152-4_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics