Skip to main content

Introduction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sociology in Poland

Part of the book series: Sociology Transformed ((SOTR))

  • 179 Accesses

Abstract

The introduction discusses the history of sociology in Poland up to 1945. It includes an overview of the country’s situation in the nineteenth century and the difficulties which the institutionalization of sociology encountered in a European society deprived of a national state framework for over a hundred years. The focus is on the decisive period between 1918 and 1939, when the first sociological institutes were established and basic directions in research and theory were set. The author argues that this newborn Polish sociology was marked by strong public commitment. It was striving for universal consequentiality, but frequently failed to achieve this as a result of pauperization and parochialism. The tension between local engagement and international academic excellence is claimed to reemerge at each subsequent stage of the development of sociology in Poland, notwithstanding the political conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    1. There is no consensus about how the words “socialism” and “communism” should be used when describing the history of Poland from 1945 until 1989. Therefore, I propose to refer to Poland as a socialist country, whereas the ruling party was, of course, the Communist Party. For the period before 1989, I usually use expressions like “communist rule,” “under communism,” or “communist times.” For the period after 1989, I usually stick to the term “democracy,” even though the Polish People’s Republic was also a self-proclaimed (people’s) democracy.

  2. 2.

    2. A somewhat older journal should be mentioned, which was a common organ for lawyers, economists and sociologists called Ruch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny (established in 1921; Jan Stanisław Bystroń was instrumental in adding the word “Socjologiczny” to the title in 1924; Wincławski 2001).

  3. 3.

    3. All translations in this book are my own.

References

  • Bielecka-Prus, J. (2009). Społeczne role socjologów w PRL. Przegląd Socjologiczny, 58(2), 71–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bucholc, M. (2016). Max Weber’s sociology of law in Poland: A case of a missing perspective. In W. Gephart & D. Witte (Eds.), Rechts als Kultur. Max Webers vergleichende Kultursoziologie des Rechts. Frankfurt a.M: Klostermann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebow, K. (2012). The conscience of the skin: Interwar Polish autobiography and social rights. Humanity: An International Journal of Human Rights, Humanitarianism, and Development, 3(3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Keen, M. F., & Mucha, J. L. (Eds.). (2006). Autobiographies of transformation. Lives in Central and Eastern Europe. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, M. D. (2015). Globalizing knowledge. Intellectuals, universities, and publics in transformation. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kojder, A. (2010). Sprawcze siły racjonalizacji prawa. Zarys socjologii prawa Maxa Webera. In Z. Kurcz & I. Taranowicz (Eds.), Okolice socjologicznej tożsamości. Księga poświęcona pamięci Wojciecha Sitka. Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kończal, K., & Wawrzyniak, J. (Eds.). (2015). Stefan Czarnowski. Listy do Henri Huberta i Marcela Maussa (1905–1937) – Lettres à Henri Hubert et à Marcel Mauss (1905–1937) (F. Rogalski & D. Thiriet, Trans.). Warszawa: Oficyna Naukowa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraśko, N. (1996). Instytucjonalizacja socjologii w Polsce 1920–1970. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwaśniewicz, W. ([2001] 2012). List Władysława Kwaśniewicza (z roku 2001) do Włodzimierza Wincławskiego, będący głosem w dyskusji na temat socjologii polskiej w okresie stalinowskim lat 1945–55 (przygotował do druku adresat listu. Roczniki Historii Socjologii, II, 166–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mucha, J. (2003). Polish sociology, 1990–2000: Society after a breakthrough, sociology in evolution. In M. F. Keen & J. L. Mucha (Eds.), Sociology in Central and Eastern Europe. Transformation at the dawn of a new millennium. Westport: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mucha, J., & Krzyżowski, Ł. (2014). No longer between East and West: Dialectics and paradoxes in Polish sociology. In S. Koniordos & A.-A. Kyrtsis (Eds.), Routledge handbook of European sociology. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sułek, A. (1997). Dziesięć zjazdów socjologów polskich. Gazeta Uniwersytecka UŚ. Wydanie specjalne Wrzesień 1997. Retrieved November 13, 2015, from http://gazeta.us.edu.pl/node/241741

  • Sułek, A. (2002). The multifarious and changing functions of the Polish sociological association. International Sociology, 17(2) (pp. 213–231) (with the collaboration of Nina Kraśko).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sułek, A. (2011). Obrazy z życia socjologii w Polsce. Warszawa: Oficyna Naukowa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szacki, J. (Ed.). (1995a). Sto lat socjologii polskiej. Wybór tekstów. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szacki, J. (Ed.). (1995b). Wstęp: krótka historia socjologii polskiej. In J. Szacki (Ed.), Sto lat socjologii polskiej. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sztompka, P. (2011). Czy istnieje socjologia polska? Studia Socjologiczne, 2(201), 43–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wincławski, W. (2001). Słownik biograficzny socjologii polskiej (Vol. 1. A–H). Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiśniewski, R., & Pawlak, M. (2013). Tradycja i teraźniejszość Polskiego Towarzystwa Socjologicznego. In Z. Kruszewski (Ed.), Towarzystwa naukowe w Polsce. Dziedzictwo, kultura, nauka, trwanie (Vol. 2). Warszawa: Rada Towarzystw Naukowych przy Prezydium PAN.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank all those who helped me during my work on this book, either by their advice and suggestions, or by their own writing, or both. My thanks also go to all the authors quoted in this book: the interpretation may be mine, but it is based on much thorough research work done by others. I particularly appreciate the patience of Agnieszka Jasiewicz-Betkiewicz, Janusz Mucha, Antoni Sułek and Joanna Wawrzyniak, whose answers to my questions saved me from many mistakes. Those which, regrettably, found their way into the text are my own responsibility, and omissions are, of course, a collateral risk in such a short book. Further, my thanks go to Clemens Albrecht, Nina Dethloff and Werner Gephart, directors of the “Law as Culture” Centre in Bonn, who did not object to my dedicating a large part of my time as research professor in this institution to sociology in Poland. To Jarosław Kopeć, Daniel Kontowski and Anna Leyk I am infinitely obliged for part of the desk research done for this book, and to Anna Leyk I am additionally indebted for editing the first version of the manuscript. I also acknowledge the support of Polish National Science Centre (project number 2014/13/B/HS6/03741).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bucholc, M. (2016). Introduction. In: Sociology in Poland. Sociology Transformed. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58187-7_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58187-7_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-58186-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-58187-7

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics