Abstract
Systems thinking, pioneered and developed further by the biologist and psychologist Gestalt, as early as the 1920s, considered interrelationships and inter-connectedness of concepts and the significance of context. Management science has since adopted and advocated systems thinking as an alternative to the traditional and mechanistic ways of managing change and people, which was linear and failed to offer insight on these complex dynamics. The evidence in this study shows the entrepreneur-manager interrelationship and firm changes happening in their natural context, and the organization adapting to the change while preserving strategic aspects of growth and performance over a period of time. The original conceptual framework using Lumpkin and Dess (1996) entrepreneurial orientation framework was modified after the analysis to include the dynamic interrelationships reflective of an open system, because I was more conceptually conducive to explore these relationships.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ackoff, R., & Addison, H. (2010). Systems thinking for curious managers. Axminster: Triarchy Press.
Ackoff, R. L., Addison, H. J., & Carey, A. (2010). Systems thinking for curious managers: With 40 new management f-laws. Axminster: Triarchy Press.
Autio, E., Dahlander, L., & Frederiksen, L. (2013). Information exposure, opportunity evaluation, and entrepreneurial action: An investigation of an online user community. Academy of Management Journal, 56, 1348–1371.
Flood, R. (2010). The relationship of ‘systems thinking’ to action research. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 23, 269–284.
Gregoire, D. A., Corbett, A. C., & McMullen, J. S. (2011). The cognitive perspective in entrepreneurship: An agenda for future research. Journal of Management Studies, 48, 1443–1477.
Haynie, J. M., Shepherd, D. A., & McMullen, J. S. (2009). An opportunity for me? The role of resources in opportunity evaluation decisions. Journal of Management Studies, 46, 337–361.
Haynie, J. M., Shepherd, D., Mosakowski, E., & Earley, P. C. (2010). A situated metacognitive model of the entrepreneurial mindset. Journal of Business Venturing, 25, 217–229.
Levie, J., & Lichtenstein, B. B. (2010). A terminal assessment of stages theory: Introducing a dynamic state approach to entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(2), 317–350.
Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (1996). Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review, 21, 135–172.
Miller, D. (1983). The correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of firms. Management Science, 29(7), 770–792.
Mintzberg, H. (1973). Strategy-making in three modes. California Management Review, 2, 44–53.
Mitchell, J. R., & Shepherd, D. A. (2010). To thine own self be true: Images of self, images of opportunity, and entrepreneurial action. Journal of Business Venturing, 25, 138–154.
Polanyi, M. (1967). The tacit dimension. New York: Doubleday.
Richmond, B. (1993). Systems thinking: Critical thinking skills for the 1990s and beyond. System Dynamics Review, 9(2), 113–133.
Sarasvathy, S. D. (2001a). Causation and effectuation: Toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency. The Academy of Management Review, 26, 243–263.
Sarasvathy, S. D. (2001b). Effectual reasoning in entrerpreneurial decision-making: Existence and bounds. Academy of Management Proceedings, 1, 1–7.
Senge, P. (1990). The fifth discipline. New York: Doubleday.
Shane, S. (2000). Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities. Organizational Science, 11, 448–469.
Shepherd, D. (2015). Party on! a call for entrepreneurship research that is more interactive, activity based, cognitively hot, compassionate, and prosocial. Journal of Business Venturing, 30, 489–507.
Shepherd, D. A., & DeTienne, D. R. (2005). Prior knowledge, potential financial reward and opportunity identification. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(1), 9–112.
von Bertalanffy, L. (1934a). Untersuchungen über die Gesetzlichkeit des Wachstums I. Allgemeine Grundlagen der Theorie. Mathematisch-physiologische Gesetzlichkeiten des Wachstums bei Wassertieren. Wilhelm Roux’ Archiv für Entwicklungsmechanik der Organismen, 131, 613–652.
von Bertalanffy, L. (1934b). Wandlungen des biologischen Denkens. Neue Jahrbücher für Wissenschaft und Jugendbildung, 10, 339–366.
von Bertalanffy, L. (1937a). Biologische Gesetzlichkeit im Lichte der organismischen Auffassung. In Travaux du IXe Congrès International de Philosophie. Paris: Hermann.
von Bertalanffy, L. (1937b). Das Gefüge des Lebens. Leipzig: Teubner.
von Bertalanffy, L. (1968). General systems theory. New York: George Braziller, Inc..
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Taylor, L. (2017). Linking Open Systems Thinking to the Entrepreneurial Paradox. In: The Entrepreneurial Paradox. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-56949-3_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-56949-3_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-56948-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-56949-3
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)