Abstract
In a 1961 paper titled The Economics of Information, George Stigler introduced the costs of search, thereby allowing the problem of information to enter the arguments of the utility function. In so doing Stigler employed what he thought were the three assets of any successful new economic theory, namely: generality, manageability, and congruence with reality. The search for greater generality and greater congruence with reality of the many facets of economic behavior also lies at the base of the challenging De Gustibus non est disputandum paper (1977) written by Stigler with his colleague Gary Becker. The latter paper represents a major effort to expand the reach of the maximization of utility principle into domains that were before excluded from economic analysis and regarded as either beyond the scope of economic theory or an instance of its failure. I shall argue here that, though the rhetorical strength of the new approach should not be undervalued, it says more for the flexibility and generality of the theoretical apparatus of the rational economic choice it purports to defend than it does for the richer understanding of human choice and action that it claims to have achieved. Stigler’s view of knowledge will be compared with the alternative view of Frank Knight, earlier doyen of Chicago Economics for whom the problem of knowledge was preeminently a problem of understanding and discovery, and a process of creating new values.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Becker, G. S. 1962. Irrational Behavior and Economic Theory. Journal of Political Economy, 70 (1): 1–13.
Becker, G. S. 1963. Rational Action and Economic Theory: A Reply to I. Kirzner. Journal of Political Economy, 71 (1): 82–83.
Becker, G. S. 1965. A Theory of the Allocation of Time. The Economic Journal, 75 (299): 493–517.
Becker, G. S. 1976. The Economic Approach to Human Behavior. Chicago. The University of Chicago Press.
Becker, G. S. 1993. Human capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, with Wpecial Reference to Education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 3rd edition (first edition 1964. National Bureau of Economic Research, General series; no. 80).
Becker, G. S., M. Grossman, K., and M. Murphy. 1994. An Empirical Analysis of Cigarette Addiction. The American Economic Review, 84 (3): 396–418.
Berlyne, D. E. 1978. Curiosity and Learning. Motivation and Emotion, 2 (2): 97–175.
Berlyne, D. E., and K. B. Madsen (Eds.). 1973. Pleasure, Reward, Preference. New York: Academic Press.
Bianchi, M. (Ed.). 1998. The Active Consumer: Novelty and Surprise in Consumer Choice. London: Routledge.
Bianchi, M. 2002. Novelty, Preferences, and Fashion: When Goods Are Unsettling. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 47: 1–18.
Bianchi, M. 2014. The Magic of Storytelling: How Curiosity and Aesthetic Preferences Work. Economics, Open Access Journal. http://www.economics-ejournal.org/economics/journalarticles/2014-44.
Bianchi, M. 2016. The Economics of Motivations: Tibor Scitovsky and Daniel Berlyne. History of Political Economy. Special Issue on “Economizing Mind, 1870–2015: When Economics and Psychology Met … or Didn’t”, edited by Marina Bianchi and Neil De Marchi.
Caplan, B. 2003. Stigler–Becker Versus Myers–Briggs: Why Preference-Based Explanations Are Scientifically Meaningful and Empirically Important. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 50 (4): 391–405.
Chamberlin, Edward. 1933. Monopolistic Competition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Coase, R. H. 1960. The Problem of Social Cost. Journal of Law and Economics, 3: 1–44.
Coase, R. H. 1991. ‘George J. Stigler’, in Remembering the University of Chicago: Teachers, Scientists, and Scholars, Ed. Edward Shils. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Cowen, T. 1989. Are All Tastes Constant and Identical? A Critique of Stigler and Becker. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 11: 127–135.
Emmett, R. B. 2006. De Gustibus est Disputandum: Frank H. Knight’s Reply to George Stigler and Gary Becker’s ‘De gustibus Non Est Disputandum’ with an introductory essay. Journal of Economic Methodology, 13 (1): 97–111.
Ekelund, Robert B. Jr., and Robert F. Hébert. 1990. E.H. Chamberlin and Contemporary Industrial Organization Theory. Journal of Economic Studies, 17 (2): 20–31.
Freedman, C. 2002. The Xistence of Definitional Economics: Stigler’s and Leibenstein’s War of the Words. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 26: 161–178.
Freedman, C. 2005. Power Without Glory: George Stigler’s Market Leviathan. History of Economics Review, 41 (Winter): 19–48.
Freedman, C. 2016. In Search of the Two-Handed Economist: Ideology, Methodology and Marketing in Economics. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hoover, K. D. 2017. First Principles, Fallibilism and Economics. The Center for the History of Political Economy Working Paper Series, 2017-01. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2901539.
Keppler J. H. 1998. The Genesis of ‘Positive Economics’ and the Rejection of Monopolistic Competition Theory: A Methodological Debate. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 22: 261–276.
Knight, F. H. 1935a [1922]. ‘Ethics and the Economic Interpretation’, in The Ethics of Competition and Other Essays. New York: Harper & Bros., 19–40.
Knight, F. H. 1935b [1923]. ‘The Ethics of Competition’, in The Ethics of Competition and Other Essays. New York: Harper & Bros., 41–75.
Knight, F. H. 1935c [1925]. ‘Economic Psychology and the Value Problem’, in The Ethics of Competition and Other Essays. New York: Harper & Bros., 76–104.
Medema, S.G. 2011. A Case of Mistaken Identity: George Stigler, the Problem of Social Cost, and the Coase Theorem. European Journal of Law and Economics, 31: 11–38.
Nisticò, S. 2017. Consumption Choices and Time Use: History, Theory and Potential Empirical Evidence. Forthcoming in Oeconomia, Special issue on “Time in Economics”.
Patinkin D. 1973. Frank Knight as Teacher. The American Economic Review, 63 (5): 787–810.
Rosenberg, A. 1979. Can Economic Theory Explain Everything? Philosophy of Social Science, 9: 509–29.
Rosenberg, A. 1985. Prospects for the Elimination of Tastes from Economics and Ethics. Social Philosophy and Policy, 2: 48–68.
Rosenberg, A. 1992. Economics—Mathematical Politics or Science of Diminishing Returns? Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Schelling, T. 1984. Choice and Consequences. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Scherer, K. R., A. Schorr, and T. Johnstone (Eds.). 2001. Appraisal Processes in Emotion: Theory, Methods, Research. New York: Oxford University Press.
Silvia, P. J. 2006. Exploring the Psychology of Interest. New York: Oxford University Press.
Stigler, G. J. 1947. The Kinky Oligopoly Demand Curve and Rigid Prices. Journal of Political Economy, 55 (3): 432–49.
Stigler, G. J. 1949. ‘Monopolistic Competition in Retrospect’, in Five Lectures on Economic Problems. London: London School of Economics and Longmans, Green and Co.
Stigler, G. J. 1950a. The Development of Utility Theory. I. Journal of Political Economy, 58 (4): 307–327.
Stigler, G. J. 1950b. The Development of Utility Theory. II. Journal of Political Economy, 58 (5): 373–396.
Stigler, G. J. 1961. The Economics of Information. Journal of Political Economy, 69 (3): 213–225.
Stigler, G. J. 1964. A Theory of Oligopoly. Journal of Political Economy, 72 (1): 44–46.
Stigler, G. J. 1966. The Theory of Price (3rd ed.). New York: Macmillan.
Stigler, G. J. 1972. The Adoption of the Marginal Utility Theory, in Stigler 1982: 72–85.
Stigler, G. J. 1973. Frank Knight as Teacher. Journal of Political Economy, 81 (3): 518–520.
Stigler, G. J. 1976. The Xistence of X-efficiency. American Economic Review, 60 (1): 213–16.
Stigler, G. J. 1978. The Literature of Economics: The Case of the Kinked Oligopoly Demand Curve. Economic Inquiry, 16 (1): 185–208.
Stigler, G. J. 1981a. The Economist as Preacher, in Stigler 1982: 3–13.
Stigler, G. J. 1981b. The Ethics of Competition: The Friendly Economists, in Stigler 1982: 14–26.
Stigler, G. J. 1981c. The Ethics of Competition: The Unfriendly Critics, in Stigler 1982: 27–37.
Stigler, G. J. 1982. The Economist as Preacher and Other Essays. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Stigler, G. J. 1983. Nobel Lecture: The Process and Progress of Economics. Journal of Political Economy, 91 (4): 529–545.
Stigler, G. J. 1984. Economics: The Imperial Science? The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 86 (3): 301–313.
Stigler, G. J. 1987. Frank H. Knight, in J. Eatwell, M. Milgate, and P. Newman (Eds.). The New Palgrave Dictionary of Political Economy, vol. 3. New York: Stockton Press, pp. 55–59.
Stigler, G. J. 1988. Memoirs of an Unregulated Economist. New York: Basic Books.
Stigler, G. J., and G. S. Becker. 1977. De Gustibus Non Est Disputandum. American Economic Review, 67 (2): 76–90.
Viner, J. 2013. Jacob Viner: Lectures in Economics 301. Edited by Douglas A. Irwin and Steven G. Medema. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bianchi, M. (2020). George Stigler: Knowledge, Preferences, and (Self-Interested) Choices. In: Freedman, C. (eds) George Stigler. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-56815-1_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-56815-1_20
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-56814-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-56815-1
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)