Skip to main content

Introducing Ipsative Assessment and Personal Learning Gain: Voices from Practitioners and the Themes of the Collection

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Ipsative Assessment and Personal Learning Gain

Abstract

Ipsative assessment rewards progress rather than achievement and potentially motivates and empowers all learners not only the high fliers, but it has yet to become common practice. Learning gain is a measure of the distance travelled between two or more points in a programme of learning and can be used for ipsative summative assessment. This chapter introduces and explores these terms to support the purpose of the collection: to provide a professional evidence base for expanding and supporting ipsative assessment in schools, colleges and universities. Four themes are introduced for a meta-analysis of the case studies and the chapter illustrates these themes with examples. These themes include: enhancing learning through ispative feedback, how to measure personal learning gain, identifying the implementation challenges including frictions between ipsative and conventional assessment practice. The chapter finishes by mapping out the case studies in terms of the type of ipsative assessment covered as well as the institutional and national context to help the reader navigate the collection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Arum, R., & Roksa, J. (2011). Academically adrift: Limited learning on college campuses. Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York: David McKay Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloxham, S., Boyd, P., & Orr, S. (2011). Mark my words: The role of assessment criteria in UK higher education grading practices. Studies in Higher Education, 36(6), 655–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broadfoot, P. (1996). Education, assessment and society. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dweck, C. (1999). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. Philadelphia: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ecclestone, K. (2007). Commitment, compliance and comfort zones: The effects of formative assessment on vocational education students’ learning careers. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 14(3), 313–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P. (1973). Pedagogy of the oppressed. 2nd edition. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, G., & Simpson, C. (2004). Conditions under which assessment supports students’ learning. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, 1(1), 3–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higher Education Funding Council for England. (2015). Invitation to submit expressions of interest in piloting and evaluating measures of learning gain. http://www.hefce.ac.uk/pubs/year/2015/CL,042015/. Accessed July 2015.

  • Hughes, G. (2011). Aiming for personal best: A case for introducing ipsative assessment in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 36(3), 353–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, G. (2014). Ipsative assessment: Motivation through marking progress. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, G., Smith, H., & Creese, B. (2015). Not seeing the wood for the trees: Developing a feedback analysis tool to explore feed forward in modularised programmes. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 40(8), 1079–1094.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, G., Wood, E., & Kitagawa, K. (2014). Use of self-referential (ipsative) feedback to motivate and guide distance learners. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 29(1), 31–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laurillard, D. (2012). Teaching as a design science: Building pedagogical patterns for learning. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luckin, R. (2010). Redesigning learning contexts: Technology-rich, learner-centred ecologies. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molloy, E., & Boud, D. (2013). Changing conceptions of feedback. In D. Boud & E. Molloy (Eds.), Feedback in higher and professional education: Understanding it and doing it well (pp. 11–23). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicol, D. (2010). From monologue to dialogue: Improving written feedback processes in mass higher education. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 3(5), 501–517).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicol, D. (2013). Resituating feedback from the reactive to the proactive. In D. Boud & E. Molloy (Eds.), Feedback in higher and professional education: Understanding it and doing it well (pp. 24–49). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicol, D., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Donovan, B., Price, M., & Rust, C. (2004). Know what I mean? Enhancing student understanding of assessment standards and criteria. Teaching in Higher Education, 9, 325–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orsmond, P., & Merry, S. (2011). Feedback alignment: Effective and ineffective links between tutors’ and students’ understanding of coursework feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 36(2), 125–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18, 119–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sammons, P. (2012). Methodological issues and new trends in educational effectiveness research. In C. Chapman, P. Armstrong, A. Harris, D. Muijs, D. Reynolds, & P. Sammon (Eds.), School effectiveness and improvement research, policy and practice: Challenging the orthodoxy (pp. 9–26). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stobart, G. (2008). Testing times: The uses and abuses of assessment. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gwyneth Hughes .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hughes, G. (2017). Introducing Ipsative Assessment and Personal Learning Gain: Voices from Practitioners and the Themes of the Collection. In: Hughes, G. (eds) Ipsative Assessment and Personal Learning Gain. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-56502-0_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-56502-0_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-56501-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-56502-0

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics