Abstract
Ipsative assessment rewards progress rather than achievement and potentially motivates and empowers all learners not only the high fliers, but it has yet to become common practice. Learning gain is a measure of the distance travelled between two or more points in a programme of learning and can be used for ipsative summative assessment. This chapter introduces and explores these terms to support the purpose of the collection: to provide a professional evidence base for expanding and supporting ipsative assessment in schools, colleges and universities. Four themes are introduced for a meta-analysis of the case studies and the chapter illustrates these themes with examples. These themes include: enhancing learning through ispative feedback, how to measure personal learning gain, identifying the implementation challenges including frictions between ipsative and conventional assessment practice. The chapter finishes by mapping out the case studies in terms of the type of ipsative assessment covered as well as the institutional and national context to help the reader navigate the collection.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Arum, R., & Roksa, J. (2011). Academically adrift: Limited learning on college campuses. Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press.
Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York: David McKay Company.
Bloxham, S., Boyd, P., & Orr, S. (2011). Mark my words: The role of assessment criteria in UK higher education grading practices. Studies in Higher Education, 36(6), 655–670.
Broadfoot, P. (1996). Education, assessment and society. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Dweck, C. (1999). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. Philadelphia: Taylor & Francis.
Ecclestone, K. (2007). Commitment, compliance and comfort zones: The effects of formative assessment on vocational education students’ learning careers. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 14(3), 313–333.
Freire, P. (1973). Pedagogy of the oppressed. 2nd edition. London: Penguin.
Gibbs, G., & Simpson, C. (2004). Conditions under which assessment supports students’ learning. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, 1(1), 3–31.
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112.
Higher Education Funding Council for England. (2015). Invitation to submit expressions of interest in piloting and evaluating measures of learning gain. http://www.hefce.ac.uk/pubs/year/2015/CL,042015/. Accessed July 2015.
Hughes, G. (2011). Aiming for personal best: A case for introducing ipsative assessment in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 36(3), 353–367.
Hughes, G. (2014). Ipsative assessment: Motivation through marking progress. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hughes, G., Smith, H., & Creese, B. (2015). Not seeing the wood for the trees: Developing a feedback analysis tool to explore feed forward in modularised programmes. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 40(8), 1079–1094.
Hughes, G., Wood, E., & Kitagawa, K. (2014). Use of self-referential (ipsative) feedback to motivate and guide distance learners. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 29(1), 31–44.
Laurillard, D. (2012). Teaching as a design science: Building pedagogical patterns for learning. London: Routledge.
Luckin, R. (2010). Redesigning learning contexts: Technology-rich, learner-centred ecologies. London: Routledge.
Molloy, E., & Boud, D. (2013). Changing conceptions of feedback. In D. Boud & E. Molloy (Eds.), Feedback in higher and professional education: Understanding it and doing it well (pp. 11–23). London: Routledge.
Nicol, D. (2010). From monologue to dialogue: Improving written feedback processes in mass higher education. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 3(5), 501–517).
Nicol, D. (2013). Resituating feedback from the reactive to the proactive. In D. Boud & E. Molloy (Eds.), Feedback in higher and professional education: Understanding it and doing it well (pp. 24–49). London: Routledge.
Nicol, D., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199–218.
O’Donovan, B., Price, M., & Rust, C. (2004). Know what I mean? Enhancing student understanding of assessment standards and criteria. Teaching in Higher Education, 9, 325–335.
Orsmond, P., & Merry, S. (2011). Feedback alignment: Effective and ineffective links between tutors’ and students’ understanding of coursework feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 36(2), 125–126.
Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18, 119–144.
Sammons, P. (2012). Methodological issues and new trends in educational effectiveness research. In C. Chapman, P. Armstrong, A. Harris, D. Muijs, D. Reynolds, & P. Sammon (Eds.), School effectiveness and improvement research, policy and practice: Challenging the orthodoxy (pp. 9–26). London: Routledge.
Stobart, G. (2008). Testing times: The uses and abuses of assessment. Abingdon: Routledge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hughes, G. (2017). Introducing Ipsative Assessment and Personal Learning Gain: Voices from Practitioners and the Themes of the Collection. In: Hughes, G. (eds) Ipsative Assessment and Personal Learning Gain. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-56502-0_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-56502-0_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-56501-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-56502-0
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)