Skip to main content

Valuing Cultural Participation: The Usefulness of the Eighteenth-Century Stage

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Histories of Cultural Participation, Values and Governance

Part of the book series: New Directions in Cultural Policy Research ((NDCPR))

Abstract

This chapter examines eighteenth-century examples of cultural participation as useful challenges to the rhetoric of contemporary cultural policy on cultural participation. The historical case studies suggest new ways of addressing the question of value and valuation beyond utilitarian or instrumental benefits, remind us that the categorisation of legitimate and illegitimate culture is continually in flux, and suggest that cultural participation may sometimes be politically unruly. Examining three case studies—John Dennis’s defence The Usefulness of the Stage (1698), the repercussions of the Stage Licensing Act of 1737, and the Chinese Festival theatre riots of 1755—exposes the complex stakes of cultural participation in historical actuality, rather than only in terms of intellectual history, and broadens the palette of our rhetoric about cultural participation. The unrealised potential of eighteenth-century discourses offers new ways to think about the fuller experience of cultural participation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Despite the reuse of language, the detail is quite distinct from the political aspiration of Jennie Lee’s first A Policy for the Arts (1965) or the aim for social inclusion through culture under the Labour administration 1997–2010 (Belfiore 2004; Hesmondhalgh et al. 2015).

  2. 2.

    Elegant historical critiques and extensions of Habermas’s conception of the public sphere include Downie (2003), Fraser (1990, 2007), Vickery (1983), and Warner (2002), yet the trope endures most recently in relation to the theatrical in Balme (2014) and cultural McGuigan (2005).

  3. 3.

    Citing Golding and Murdock (2005), who see the economy as political and for whom the balance of private, capitalist enterprise and public or state intervention goes ‘beyond technical issues of efficiency to engage with basic moral questions of justice, equity and the public good’ (61).

  4. 4.

    Critique of the stage and public morality rages the pamphlet wars around the Collier controversy, see Kinservik (2002) and Wilson (2012).

  5. 5.

    This intrinsic versus instrumental structure as employed in Bakhshi et al. (2009), McCarthy et al. (2004), O’Brien (2010) is somewhat different to early utilitarian argument which co-located utility and intrinsic qualities such as pleasure articulated by Bentham (1789).

  6. 6.

    Kinservik (2002) argues the Societies were a serious threat to theatre; Hume (1999) suggests they were not, but left the way open for the Licensing Act.

  7. 7.

    Non-jurors were Anglican clerics who refused the new Oath of Allegiance to William as king and thus were suspected as Jacobite supporters of the exiled James.

  8. 8.

    Pleasure is a characteristic element of consequentialist thought, and the intrinsic experience of pleasure as a good equates to utility. On the shift from Bentham’s individual rational utilitarianism to neoclassical economics, Mill and nineteenth-century reconfigurations see Goodwin (2006).

  9. 9.

    Morillo (2000) explores the political battle between Tory and Whig writers that encouraged critics to construe Dennis’ egalitarian call to enthusiastic passion as ‘unwitting radicalism’ (23).

  10. 10.

    Bourdieu (1984) notes the significance of experience: ‘The manner in which culture has been acquired lives on in the manner of using it;… within the educational system it devalues scholarly knowledge and interpretation as ‘scholastic’ or even ‘pedantic’ in favour of direct experience and simple delight.… Acquisition of legitimate culture by insensible familiarization within the family circle tends to favour an enchanted experience of culture which implies forgetting the acquisition’ (2, 3).

  11. 11.

    A fuller discussion is found in Miles and Gibson edited special issues of Cultural Trends 25.3 (2016) and 26.1 (2017).

  12. 12.

    See also DiMaggio (1982) where he discusses an earlier moment of theatrical legitimation (42).

  13. 13.

    Mouffe analyses Boltanski and Chiapello (2007)’s observations on the absorption of the ‘aesthetic strategies of the counter-culture’ (Mouffe, 90) and argues what is needed now is ‘a set of counter-hegemonic interventions, to disarticulate the existing hegemony and to establish a more progressive one thanks to a process of re-articulation of new and old elements into different configuration of power’ (Mouffe 2008, n.p.).

  14. 14.

    Although the war in Europe did not formally occur until the following summer, British ships were harassing French trading vessels, over North American colonies and India, as a prelude to ‘the first global war for empire’, the Seven Years War (Fordham 2010, 3).

Bibliography

  • Abrams, M. H. (1985). From Addison to Kant: Modern Aesthetics and the Exemplary Art. In R. Cohen (Ed.), Studies in Eighteenth-Century British Art and Aesthetics (pp. 16–48). Berkley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, B. (2006). Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakhshi, H., Freeman, A., & Hitchen, G. (2009). Measuring Intrinsic Value: How to Stop Worrying and Love Economics. Munich Personal RePEc Archive (MPRA), Paper Number 14902. http://www.missionmodelsmoney.org.uk/page.php?id=34. Accessed 25 Mar 2016.

  • Balme, C. (2014). The Theatrical Public Sphere. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Barish, J. A. (1985). The Antitheatrical Prejudice. Oakland: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belfiore, E. (2004). Auditing Culture: The Subsidised Cultural Sector in the New Public Management. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 10(2), 183–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belfiore, E., & Bennett, O. (2008). The Social Impact of the Arts. London: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, T. (1995). The Birth of the Museum: History, Theory, Politics. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, T., et al. (2009). Culture, Class, Distinction. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bentham, J. (1789). An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. London: T. Payne & Son.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhabha, H. (Ed.). (1990). Nation and Narration. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boltanski, L., & Chiapello, E. (2007). The New Spirit of Capitalism. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste (R. Nice, Trans.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. (2010). Performative Agency. Journal of Cultural Economy, 3(2), 147–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, D. (2015). Representing China on the Historical London Stage. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Colley, L. (1992). Britons: Forging the Nation, 1707–1837. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crossick, G. (2016). Understanding the Value of Arts and Culture. Swindon: Arts and Humanities Research Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crossick, G., & Kaszynska, P. (2014). Under Construction: Towards a Framework for Cultural Value. Cultural Trends, 23(2), 120–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curtis, T. C., & Speck, W. A. (1976). The Societies for the Reformation of Manners. Literature and History, 3, 45–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, T. (1781). Memoirs of the Life of David Garrick (Vol. I). London: T. Davies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Defoe, D. (1698). The Poor Man’s Pleas in Relation to the Reformation of Manners. London: A. Baldwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennis, J. (1698). The Usefulness of the Stage to the Happiness of Mankind, to Government, and to Religion. In E. N. Hooker (Ed.), The Critical Works of John Dennis (Vol. I, pp. 146–193). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department for Culture, Media and Sport. (2016, March). The Culture White Paper. Cm9218 Crown Copyright 2016. Her Majesty’s Stationery Office. ISBN 9781474129312.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P. (1982). Cultural Entrepreneurship in 19th Century Boston: The Creation of an Organizational Base for High Culture in America. Media, Culture and Society, 4, 33–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P. (1992). Cultural Boundaries and Structural Change: The Extension of the High Culture Model to Theater, Opera, and the Dance, 1900–1940. In M. Lamont & M. Fournier (Eds.), Cultivating Differences: Symbolic Boundaries and the Making of Inequality (pp. 21–44). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donovan, C. (2013, May 10). A Holistic Approach to Valuing Our Culture. London: DCMS. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/197826/Holistic_Approach_10_May_2013finalforweb.pdf. Accessed 26 Mar 2017.

  • Downie, J. A. (2003). How Useful to Eighteenth-Century English Studies Is the Paradigm of the ‘Bourgeois Public Sphere’? Literature Compass, 1, 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fordham, D. (2010). British Art and the Seven Years War. Philadelphia: University Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, N. (1990). Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy. Social Text, 25(26), 56–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, N. (2007). Transnationalizing the Public Sphere: On the Legitimacy and Efficacy of Public Opinion in a Post-Westphalian World. Theory, Culture & Society, 24(4), 7–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, L. (2008). In Defence of Instrumentality. Cultural Trends, 17(4), 247–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golding, P., & Murdock, G. (2005). Culture, Communications and Political Economy. In J. Curran & M. Gurevitch (Eds.), Mass Media and Society (pp. 70–92). London: Hodder.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, C. (2006). Art and Culture in the History of Economic Thought. In V. Ginsburgh & D. Throsby (Eds.), Handbook of the Economics of Art and Culture (pp. 25–68). Dordrecht: Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, C. (2007). Commodification and Instrumentality in Cultural Policy. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 13(2), 203–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, C. (2009). Managing Cultural Policy: Pitfalls and Prospects. Public Administration, 87(3), 574–585.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1989). The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere (T. Burger, Trans.). London: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennion, A. (2003). Music and Mediation: Towards a New Sociology of Music. In M. Clayton, T. Herbert, & R. Middleton (Eds.), The Cultural Study of Music: A Critical Introduction (pp. 80–91). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hesmondhalgh, D., & Baker, S. (2011). Creative Labour: Media Work in Three Cultural Industries. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hesmondhalgh, D., Nisbett, M., Oakley, K., & Lee, D. (2015). Were New Labour’s Cultural Policies Neo-Liberal? International Journal of Cultural Policy, 21(1), 97–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewison, R. (2006). Not a Sideshow: Leadership and Cultural Value. London: Demos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewison, R. (2015). Cultural Capital: The Rise and Fall of Creative Britain. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • HM Treasury. (2013, April 18). The Green Book: Appraisal and Evaluation in Central Government. London: TSO. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-green-book-appraisal-and-evaluation-in-central-government. Accessed 24 Apr 2016.

  • Hobsbawm, E. (1990). Nations and Nationalisms Since 1780. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holden, J. (2004). Capturing Cultural Value: How Culture Has Become a Tool of Government Policy. London: Demos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holden, J. (2006). Cultural Value and the Crisis of Legitimacy: Why Culture Needs a Democratic Mandate. London: Demos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holden, J., & Hewison, R. (2014, July 14). Turbulent Times: The Prospect for Heritage. Heritage Exchange. http://www.heritageexchange.co.uk/sites/default/files/Holden%20%26%20Hewison.pdf. Accessed 26 Mar 2016.

  • Hume, R. (1999). Jeremy Collier and the Future of London Theatre in 1698. Studies in Philology, 96, 480–511.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jancovich, L., & Bianchini, F. (2013). Problematising Participation. Cultural Trends, 22(2), 63–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kershaw, B. (2001). Oh for Unruly Audiences! Or, Patterns of Participation in Twentieth-Century Theatre. Modern Drama, 44(2), 133–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kinservik, M. (2002). Disciplining Satire. Lewisburg: Bucknell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langhans, E. A. (1984). The Children of Terpsichore. In S. Strumm Kenney (Ed.), British Theatre and the Other Arts (pp. 133–145). London: Associated University Presses.

    Google Scholar 

  • Law, J. (2004). After Method: Mess in Social Science Research. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Law, J., Ruppert, E., & Savage, M. (2011). The Double Social Life of Methods. CRESC: Goldsmiths Research Online. http://research.gold.ac.uk/7987. Accessed 26 Mar 2016.

  • McCarthy, K., et al. (2004). Gifts of the Muse: Reframing the Debate About the Benefits of the Arts. Pittsburg: Rand Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuigan, J. (1996). Culture and the Public Sphere. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McGuigan, J. (2005). The Cultural Public Sphere. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 8(4), 427–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McPherson, H. (2002). Theatrical Riots and Cultural Politics in Eighteenth-Century London. The Eighteenth Century, 43(3), 236–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, A. (2013). Culture, Participation and Identity in Contemporary Manchester. In J. Wolff with M. Savage (Eds.), Culture in Manchester: Institutions and Urban Change Since 1850 (pp. 176–193). Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, A., & Gibson, L. (2016). Everyday Participation and Cultural Value. Cultural Trends, 25(3), 151–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, A., & Gibson, L. (2017). Everyday Participation and Cultural Value in Place. Cultural Trends, 26(1), 1–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morillo, J. (2000). John Dennis: Enthusiastic Passions, Cultural Memory and Literary Theory. Eighteenth Century Studies, 34(1), 21–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mouffe, C. (2008). Critique as Counter-Hegemonic Intervention. Transversal: European Institute for Progressive Cultural Policies, 4. http://eipcp.net/transversal/0808/mouffe/en. Accessed 26 Mar 2016.

  • Mouffe, C. (2013). Agonistics: Thinking the World Politically. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, A. (1756). The Apprentice. London: Paul Vaillant.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myerscough, J. (1988). The Economic Importance of the Arts in Great Britain. London: Policy Studies Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, D. (2010). Measuring the Value of Culture: A Report for the Department of Culture, Media and Sport. London: DCMS.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, D. (2014). Cultural Policy: Management, Value and Modernity in the Creative Industries. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, D., & Oakley, K. (2015). Cultural Value and Inequality. Swindon: AHRC. Available at: http://www.ahrc.ac.uk/News-and-Events/News/Documents/Cultural-Value-Inequality.pdf.

  • Ou, H. (2008). The Chinese Festival and the Eighteenth Century London Audience. Wenshan Review of Literature and Culture, 2(1), 31–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, R. A., & Simkus, A. (1992). How Musical Tastes Mark Occupational Status Groups. In M. Lamont & M. Fournier (Eds.), Cultivating Differences: Symbolic Boundaries and the Making of Inequality (pp. 152–186). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenfeld, S. (1939). Strolling Players and Drama in the Provinces 1660–1765. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryley, S. W. (1817). The Itinerant: Or, Memoirs of an Actor. London: Sherwood, Neely & Jones.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selwood, S. (2002, December 30). Measuring Culture. Spiked Culture. http://www.spiked-online.com/articles/00000006DBAF.htm. Accessed 26 Mar 2016.

  • Sennett, R. (2002). The Fall of Public Man. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiner, L. (2001). The Invention of Art: A Cultural History. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snowball, J. (2008). Measuring the Value of Culture. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, S. (2015). Aesthetics and Time: Sustained and Distracted Modes of Engagement. Cultural Sociology, 9(2), 147–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, D. (2014). The 1737 Licensing Act and Its Impact. In J. Swindells & D. F. Taylor (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the Georgian Theatre, 1737–1832 (pp. 91–106). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Throsby, D. (2010). The Economics of Cultural Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vickery, A. (1983). Golden Age to Separate Spheres: A Review of the Categories and Chronology of English Women’s History. Historical Journal, 36(2), 383–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warner, M. (2002). Publics and Counterpublics. New York: Zone Books.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wiles, D. (2012). Theatre and Citizenship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, B. D. (2012). A Race of Female Patriots. Lewisburg: Bucknell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, K. (1994). An Empire of Virtue: The Imperial Project and Hanoverian Culture. In L. Stone (Ed.), An Imperial State at War, Britain from 1689–1815 (pp. 128–164). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jane Milling .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Milling, J. (2019). Valuing Cultural Participation: The Usefulness of the Eighteenth-Century Stage. In: Belfiore, E., Gibson, L. (eds) Histories of Cultural Participation, Values and Governance. New Directions in Cultural Policy Research. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55027-9_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics