Skip to main content

Health Management Information Systems: Backbone of the Health System

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Global Health Data Methods for Policy and Practice

Abstract

Lippeveld, Azim, Boone, Dwivedi, Edwards and AbouZahr describe the health management information system (HMIS) as a key source of data for health policy and planning. The authors define the HMIS and describe the multiple data sources from which it draws, including patient records, health facility registers, community records, and health facility assessments. They describe the strengths and limitations of the HMIS and summarize how these can be addressed, with a focus on data quality and use of information for decision-making. Finally, they introduce innovations and technologies that are transforming HMIS to respond to the data needs of modern health-care systems. They show how the power of the HMIS is enhanced when linked to other data sources such as administrative record systems, censuses and surveys.

Lippeveld, Azim, Boone, Dwivedi, and Edwards are part of the Center for Health Information and Monitoring and Evaluation (CHIME) of John Snow Inc. (JSI) in Boston, USA. JSI has generously provided a grant to fund some of the time of the authors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. King’s Fund. Quarterly monitoring report 24. 2017 [cited 2018 18th February]. Available from: http://qmr.kingsfund.org.uk/2017/24/overview

  2. MEASURE Evaluation. Health management information systems (HMIS). [cited 2018 18th February]. Available from: https://www.measureevaluation.org/resources/training/capacity-building-resources/health-management-information-systems-hmis-1.4

  3. Heywood A, Boone D. United States Agency for International Development (USAID), MEASURE evaluation. Guidelines for data management standards in routine health Information systems. 2015 [cited 2018 18th February]. Available from: http://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/PA00KB8N.pdf

  4. World Health Organization. Health facility information systems resource kit. Product of a technical consultation on monitoring results with health facility information systems. 2016 [Cited 2018 18th August]. Available from http://www.who.int/healthinfo/facility_information_systems/Facility_Community_Data_Toolkit_final.pdf?ua=1

  5. World Health Organization. Towards a harmonized approach for health facility assessments. Vision, guiding principles and roadmap. Outcome of a technical consultation. 2014 [cited 2018 18th February]. Available from: http://www.who.int/healthinfo/facility_information_systems/hfa_meeting_november2014_report.pdf

  6. Demographic and Health Surveys. Service provision assessment (SPA). SPA questionnaires. [cited 2018 18th February]. Available from: http://dhsprogram.com/publications/publication-search.cfm?type=37

  7. World Bank. Service delivery indicators (SDI). 2014 [cited 2018 18th February]. Available from: http://datatopics.worldbank.org/sdi/

  8. World Health Organization (WHO), Gavi, The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria (The Global Fund), United States Agency for International Development (USAID)/MEASURE Evaluation. Data quality review (DQR) toolkit. (cited 2018 5th November). Available from: http://www.who.int/healthinfo/tools_data_analysis/dqr_modules/en/

  9. Peters DH, Noor AA, Singh LP, Kakar FK, Hansen PM, Burnham G. A balanced scorecard for health services in Afghanistan. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2007 Feb 1;85(2):146–51. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.2471/blt.06.033746

  10. John Snow, Inc. Ethiopia health management information system strengthening project 2006–2012. (cited 2018 5th November). Available from: https://www.jsi.com/JSIInternet/IntlHealth/project/display.cfm?ctid=na&cid=na&tid=40&id=1701

  11. Republic of Uganda, World Health Organization. Assessment of health facility data quality: Data quality report card, Uganda. 2011 [cited 2018 18th February]. Available from: http://www.who.int/healthinfo/country_monitoring_evaluation/UG_DataQualityReport_final_20120123.pdf

  12. Government of Kenya. Statistical review of progress towards the mid-term targets of the Kenya health sector strategic plan 2014–2018. 2017 [cited 2018 18th February]. Available from: http://www.who.int/healthinfo/country_monitoring_evaluation/KHSSP_StatisticalReport_2016.pdf?ua=1

  13. Watson Grant S, Reynolds Z, Mswia R. Liberia health outcome monitoring report lot quality assurance sampling survey in Liberia. 2012 [cited 2018 11th April]. Available from: https://www.measureevaluation.org/resources/publications/tr-12-88

  14. dhis2. The Health Information Systems Programme. [cited 2018 18th February]. Available from: https://academy.dhis2.org/about

  15. Edwards M, Lippeveld T, editors. Decision support systems for improving the analytic capacity of decentralized routine health information systems in developing countries. System Sciences, 2004 Proceedings of the 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2004. Proceedings of the IEEE; 2004; Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/hicss.2004.1265380

  16. OpenHIE. OpenHIE is a global mission-driven community of practice. [cited 2018 18th February]. Available from: https://ohie.org/-about

  17. World Health Organization. Creating a master health facility list. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization. 2013 [cited 2018 18th February]. Available from: http://www.who.int/healthinfo/systems/WHO_CreatingMFL_draft.pdf

  18. SNOMED CT. Starter guide. [cited 2018 18th February]. Available from: http://snomed.org/sg

  19. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. National health data dictionary: version 16.2. 2015 [cited 2018 18th February]. Available from: https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/australias-health/national-health-data-dictionary-version-16-2/contents/table-of-contents

  20. Open Concept Lab. [cited 2018 11th April]. Available from: https://github.com/OpenConceptLab

  21. Grob M, Hartzband D. Health centers and the data warehouse. Health Center Controlled Networks, Series HCCN Information Bulletin 2008;14. [cited 2018 5th November]. Available from: https://www.rchnfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/Data-Warehouse-and-Health-Centers_12_2_08.pdf

  22. MEASURE Evaluation. Performance of routine information system management (PRISM) framework. 2015 [cited 2018 18th February]. Available from: https://www.measureevaluation.org/resources/tools/health-information-systems/prism

  23. Hotchkiss DR, Aqil A, Lippeveld T, Mukooyo E. Evaluation of the performance of routine information system management (PRISM) framework: evidence from Uganda. BioMed Central Health Services Research. 2010 Jul 3;10(1). Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-10-188

  24. Belay H, Lippeveld T. Inventory of PRISM framework and tools: application of PRISM tools and interventions for strengthening routine health information system performance. 2013 [cited 2018 18th February]. Available from: https://www.measureevaluation.org/resources/publications/wp-13-138

  25. Lippeveld T. Routine health facility and community information systems: Creating an information use culture. Global Health: Science and Practice. 2017 Sep 27;5(3):338–40. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.9745/ghsp-d-17-00319

  26. Grove J, Claeson M, Bryce J, Amouzou A, Boerma T, Waiswa P, et al. Maternal, newborn, and child health and the Sustainable Development Goals—a call for sustained and improved measurement. Lancet. 2015 Oct;386(10003):1511–4. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(15)00517-6

  27. MEASURE Evaluation. Routine health information system curriculum. 2017 [cited 2018 18th February]. Available from: https://www.measureevaluation.org/our-work/routine-health-information-systems/rhis-curriculum

  28. PRISM Assessment. Rebuilding Basic Health Services (RBHS) Project. Performance of routine health information management in Liberia. 2014 [cited 2018 18th February]. Available from: pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/PA00JRQN.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  29. Government of United Republic of Tanzania. Ministry of Health and Social Welfare. Mid-term analytical review of performance of the Health Sector Strategic Plan III 2009–2015. 2013 [cited 2018 18th February]. Available from: http://www.who.int/healthinfo/country_monitoring_evaluation/TZ_AnalyticalReport_2013.pdf?ua=1

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Theo Lippeveld .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lippeveld, T., Azim, T., Boone, D., Dwivedi, V., Edwards, M., AbouZahr, C. (2019). Health Management Information Systems: Backbone of the Health System. In: Macfarlane, S., AbouZahr, C. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Global Health Data Methods for Policy and Practice. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-54984-6_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-54984-6_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-54983-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-54984-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics