Skip to main content

Big Four Accounting Firms: Addicted to Tax Avoidance

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Pioneers of Critical Accounting

Abstract

Major accountancy firms are a significant fraction of capital and exercise considerable influence on corporate governance, accounting, auditing and regulatory apparatuses. Their anti-social practices are frequently camouflaged with claims of ethical conduct and serving the public interest. This chapter shows that in pursuit of private profits accountancy firms have become key players in developing and marketing tax avoidance schemes which deprive the state of much needed revenues for social investment. On occasions the courts have declared some of the tax avoidance schemes to be unlawful. The firms remain addicted to avoidance schemes even though they have been fined and some of their personnel have received prison sentences. Following Tony Lowe’s edits, this chapter urges scholars to provide a critical scrutiny of the practices of major firms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Accounting Standards (formerly Steering) Committee. (1975). The corporate report. London: ICAEW.

    Google Scholar 

  • Action-Aid. (2010). Calling time: Why SABMiller should stop dodging taxes in Africa. London: Acton-Aid.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adler, P., & Borys, B. (1996). Two types of bureaucracy: Enabling and coercive. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 61–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agger, B. (2004). The virtual self. A contemporary sociology. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aglietta, M., & Rebérioux, A. (2005). Corporate governance adrift: A critique of shareholder value. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Agyemang, G., & Lehman, C. (2013). Adding critical accounting voices to migration studies. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 24(4/5), 261–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, W. (1992). Our schizophrenic conception of the business corporation. Cardozo Law Review, 14(2), 261–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amel-Zadeh, A., & Meeks, G. (2013). Bank failure, mark to market and the financial crisis. Abacus, 49(3), 308–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, N. (2003). Discursive analytical strategies: Understanding Foucault, Koselleck, Laclau and Luhmann. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andre, P., Cazavan-Jeny, A., Dick, W., Richard, C., & Walton, P. (2009). Fair value accounting and the banking crisis; shooting the messenger. Accounting in Europe, 6(1), 3–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angier, N. (1999). Woman: An intimate geography. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Angier, N. (2007). The canon. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Annisette, M. (2003). The colour of accountancy: Examining the salience of ‘race’ in a professionalization project. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28(7/8), 639–674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Annisette, M., & Trivedi, V. (2013). Globalization, paradox and the (un)making of identities: Immigrant chartered accountants of India in Canada. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 38(1), 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anthony, R. (1965). Planning and control systems: A framework for analysis. Boston: Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antonio, R. (1981). Immanent critique as the core of critical theory: Its origins and developments in Hegel, Marx and contemporary thought. British Journal of Sociology, 32(3), 330–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armour, J., Deakin, S., & Konzelmann, S. (2003). Shareholder primacy and the trajectory of UK corporate governance. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 41(3), 531–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, P. (1994). The influence of Michel Foucault on accounting research. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 5(1), 25–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, P. (2009). Global financial crisis: The challenge to accounting research. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(6), 803–809.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arrighi, G. (2010). The long twentieth century: Money, power, and the origins of our times. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrington, C. E., & Francis, J. (1989). Letting the chat out of the bag: Deconstruction, privilege and accounting research. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 14, 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arrington, C. E., & Schweiker, W. (1992). The rhetoric and rationality of accounting research. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 17, 511–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashby, W. R. (1956). An introduction to cybernetics. London: Chapman and Hall.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sikka, P. (2016). Big Four Accounting Firms: Addicted to Tax Avoidance. In: Haslam, J., Sikka, P. (eds) Pioneers of Critical Accounting. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-54212-0_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-54212-0_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-54211-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-54212-0

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics