Abstract
This chapter offers an insightful and innovative analysis of Brazil’s South–South cooperation policy by focusing in civil society’s perspective and role vis-à-vis the emergent donor practices and motivations. Brazilian development cooperation is framed under a solidarity and mutual benefit narrative, which capitalizes on Brazil’s development experience and knowledge. On the basis of the prosavana Programme in Mozambique, a Japanese–Brazilian initiative to transform the Northern Mozambique agricultural landscape, the chapter explores how Mozambican civil society, accompanied by its Brazilian and Japanese partners have exerted control while demanding accountability and transparency. The authors show that SSC is not exempt from criticism, especially when there are unclear linkages with private interests at the expense of local communities; questioning the win–win, solidarity, and knowledge-transfer principles and practices found in SSC. As Prosavana advances and the civil society opposition consolidate, the debate about the democratization of international cooperation and foreign policy in Brazil and of rural development in Mozambique heats up.
The authors thank Isaline Bergamaschi and Phoebe Moore for their comments on earlier drafts of the chapter.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aabo, Ellen, and Thomas Kring. 2012. The political economy of large scale agricultural land acquisitions: Implications for food security and livelihoods/employment creation in rural Mozambique. United Nations Development Programme Working Paper 004: 1–61.
ABC. 2009. Catálogo ABC de Cooperação Técnica do Brasil para a África. Brasilia: Agência Brasileira de Cooperação. http://www.abc.gov.br/abc_eng/webforms/interna.aspx?secao_id=130. Accessed 11 Feb 2012.
———. 2014a. Pesquisa de projetos de cooperação técnica entre países em desenvolvimento. Brasilia: Agência Brasileira de Cooperação. http://www.abc.gov.br/Projetos/CooperacaoSulSul/CooperacaoTriangular. Accessed 24 July 2014.
———. 2014b. Cooperação Triangular. Brasilia: Agência Brasileira de Cooperação. http://www.abc.gov.br/Projetos/CooperacaoSulSul/CooperacaoTriangular. Accessed 24 July 2014.
Abdenur, Adriana. 2007. The strategic triad: Forum and content in Brazil’s Triangular Cooperation Practice. International Affairs Working Paper 6: 1–15.
Ação Educativa. 2013. Os desafíos da democratizaçao da política externa Brasileira, San Paulo. http://www.acaoeducativa.org.br/index.php/em-acao/34-emacao/10004868-os-desafios-da-democratizacao-da-politica-externa-brasileira. Accessed 18 Feb 2015.
ADECRU. 2016. After having wasted more than 560 million yen on the drafting of ProSavana. Master Plan, governments resort to co-opting civil society. Maputo: Ação Académica para o Desenvolvimento das Comunidades Rurais. http://farmlandgrab.org/post/view/25684-after-having-wasted-more-than-560-million-yen-on-the-drafting-of-the-ProSavana-master-plan-governments-resort-to-co-opting-civil-society. Accessed 23 Feb 2016.
———. 2015. Chamada dos povos para invalidação imediata da “auscultação publica do plano director do ProSavana. http://fase.org.br/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/CHAMADA-DOS-POVOS-PARA-INVALIDAÇÃO-IMEDIATA-DA-AUSCULTAÇÃO-PÚBLICA-DO-PLANO-DIRECTOR-DO-ProSavana-.pdf. Accessed 23 Feb 2016.
———. 2014. Mobilização Conjunta Lança Campanha Nacional NÃO AO ProSavana. https://adecru.wordpress.com/2014/06/01/mobilizacao-conjunta-lanca-campanha-nacional-nao-ao-ProSavana/. Accessed 17 May 2015.
AJF et al. 2013. Japanese civil society joint statement on ProSavana. Call for Immediate Suspension and Fundamental Review. Tokyo: Africa Japan Forum. http://www.ajf.gr.jp/lang_en/ps20130930statement_en.html. Accessed 27 June 2014.
Amorim, Celso. 2010. Brazilian foreign policy under President Lula (2003–2010): An overview. Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional 53: 214–240.
Ayllón, Bruno. 2013. A cooperação triangular e as transformações da cooperação internacional para o desenvolvimento. Texto para Discussao IPEA 1845: 1–54.
Ayllón, Bruno, and Iara Leite. 2010. La cooperación Sur-Sur de Brasil: Instrumento de política exterior y/o manifestación de solidaridad internacional. Mural Internacional 1: 20–32.
Barbosa, Pedro. 2012. O viés instrumental da cooperação técnica horizontal brasileira. Revista Tempo do Mundo 4: 121–153.
Brazil Africa. 2013. Dilma announces new trading agency for Africa. http://www.brazilafrica.com/en/dilma-announces-new-trading-agency-for-africa/. Accessed 10 Sep 2015.
Cabral, Lidia, and Iara Leite. 2015. ProSavana and the Expanding Scope of Accountability in Brazil’s Development Cooperation. Global Policy 4: 435–445.
Cabral, Lidia, and Julia Weinstock. 2010. Brazilian technical cooperation for development: drivers, mechanics and future prospects. London: Overseas Development Institute.
CCBM. 2012. Comércio entre Moçambique e o Brasil ascendeu a 146 milhões em 2012. http://www.ccbmz.com/CCBM/Noticias/Entradas/2013/2/4_Comercio_entre_Mocambique_e_o_Brasil_ascendeu_a_146_milhoes_de_dolares_em_2012.html. Accessed 20 Apr 2013.
Chichava, Sergio, et al. 2013. Chinese and Brazilian cooperation with African agriculture: The case of Mozambique. Future Agricultures Working Paper 049: 1–30.
Clements, Elizabeth, and Bernardo Fernandes. 2012. Land grabbing, agribusiness and the peasantry in Brazil and Mozambique. Paper presented at the International Conference on Global Land Grabbing II, October 17–19.
Dauvergne, Peter, and Deborah Farias. 2012. The rise of Brazil as a global development power. Third World Quarterly 33: 903–917.
de Soares, Maria, and Monica Hirst. 2006. Brazil as an intermediate state and regional power: action, choice and responsibilities. International Affairs 82: 21–40.
Embrapa. 2012. Apoio no sistema de inovação no setor agropecuario, Embrapa em Moçambique, Brasilia. http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/africaatlse/files/2014/02/MocambiqueProSavana.pdf. Accessed 26 July 2014.
Fairbairn, Madeleine. 2011. Indirect expropriation: The role of national institutions and elites in the Mozambican farmland grab. Paper presented at the International Conference on Global Land Grabbing, Institute for Development Studies University of Sussex, April 6–8.
Farmlandgrab.org. 2013. ProSavana e face oculta do Prodecer. http://www.farmlandgrab.org/post/view/22661-ProSavana-e-face-oculta-do-prodecer. Accessed 23 Feb 2016.
FDC. 2007. Mozambican civil society within: Evaluation, challenges, opportunities and action, Maputo. http://www.iese.ac.mz/lib/af/pub/CSI%20Moz%2007%20english_.pdf. Accessed 30 July 2014.
FGV Projetos. 2013. Nacala Corridor Fund. Rio de Janeiro.
———. 2012. FGV Projetos e GVAgro lançam Fundo Nacala nesta quarta, em Brasília. http://fgvnoticias.fgv.br/pt-br/noticia/fgv-projetos-e-gvagro-lancam-fundo-nacala-nesta-quarta-feira-em-brasilia. Accessed 10 July 2015.
Fingermann, Natalia. 2014. A Cooperação Trilateral Brasileira em Moçambique. Um Estudo de Caso Comparado: O Proalimentos e o ProSavana. PhD disserstion, Fundação Getulio Vargas de São Paulo.
Folha de São Paulo. 2011. Moçambique oferece terra para os agricultores brasileiros. Folha de Sao Paulo. http://www.agora.uol.com.br/brasil/ult10102u959442.shtml. Accessed 11 Feb 2012.
Funada-Classen, Sayaka. 2013. Analysis of the discourse and background of the ProSavana Programme in Mozambique—Focusing on Japan’s role. Tokyo University of Foreign Studies.
Gonçalves, Fernanda. 2012. A atuação de atores não governamentais na cooperação Sul-Sul brasileira: entre a centralização e a participação.” Paper presented at the 1° Seminário Nacional de Pós-graduação em Relações Internacionais Instituto Superior de Educação La Salle, Brasilia, June 12–13
Hochstetler, K. 2013. The changing face of Brazil as an international donor—From Lula to Dilma Rousseff. https://www.cigionline.org/publications/2013/12/changing-face-of-brazil-international-donor-—-lula-dilma-rousseff. Accessed 13 Sep 2015.
Hurrell, Andrew. 2010. Brazil and the new global order. Current History, 1–8.
Ikegami, Koichi. 2015. Corridor development and foreign investment in agriculture: implications of the ProSavana Programme in Northern Mozambique. Paper presented at International Academic Conference of Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand, June 5–6.
Inocencio, Maria. 2010. As tramas do poder na territorializaçao do capital no Cerrado: o Prodecer. PhD dissertion, Universidad Federal de Goiás.
IPEA. 2013. Cooperação Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento Internacional, 2010. Brasilia: Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada.
Justiça Ambiental (JA). 2016. Comunicado ProSavana em discussão no seio das organizações da sociedade civil em Nampula. https://adecru.files.wordpress.com/2016/01/comunicado-encontro-de-ProSavana-nampula-19-01-2016.pdf. Accessed 26 Feb 2016.
JA4Change. 2013. JustiçaAmbiental/FOE Mozambique’s Position on the ProSavana Program. http://ja4change.wordpress.com. Accessed 19 Apr 2013.
Leite, Iara, et al. 2014. Brazil’s engagement in International Development Cooperation: The state of the debate. IDS Evidence Report Rising Power in International Development 59(2014): 1–100.
Lima, Maria. 2005. A Política Externa Brasileira e os Desafios da Cooperação Sul-Sul. Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional 48: 24–59.
‘Matutacṃões. 2012. Projeto ProSavana: cooperação ou cavalo-de-Tróia? A ambiguidade da presença brasileira em África. http://matutacoes.wordpress.com/2012/07/06/projeto-ProSavana-cooperacao-ou-cavalo-de-troia-a-ambiguidade-da-presenca-brasileira-em-africa/. Accessed 17 Dec 2012.
Macua. 2014. Posicionamento do Ministério de Agricultura sobre o ProSavana. http://macua.blogs.com/moambique_para_todos/2014/07/posicionamento-do-ministério-da-agricultura-sobre-o-pro-savana.html. Accessed 27 Sep 2015.
McEwan, Cheryl, and Emma Mawdsley. 2012. Trilateral development cooperation: Power and politics in emerging aid relationships. Development and Change 43: 1185–1209.
Mello, Fatima. 2013. O que quer o Brasil com o ProSavana? http://macua.blogs.com/moambique_para_todos/2013/03/o-que-quer-o-brasil-com-o-ProSavana.html. Accessed 23 Feb 2016.
MINAG. 2014. Comunicado de Imprensa, Maputo. https://www.ProSavana.gov.mz/index.php?p=noticia&id=16. Accessed 31 July 2014.
Ndhaneta. 2012. UNAC acusa Governo de complicidade na usurpaçao de terra. http://ndhaneta.blogspot.com/2012/11/unac-acusa-governo-de-cumplicidade-na.html. Accessed 26 July 2014.
Nogueira, Isabela, and Ossi Ollinaho. 2013. From rethoric to practice in South-South Development Cooperation: A case study of Braizlian interventions in the Nacala Corridor Development Program. Working Paper Institute of Socio-Economics, University of Geneva August 2013: 1–20.
Oakland Institute (OI). 2011. Understanding land deals in Africa, country report: Mozambique. Oakland: The Oakland Institute.
Pereira, Javier. 2011. Slow Progress towards Democratic ownership in Mozambique. Alliance2015. http://www.cooperazioneallosviluppo.esteri.it/ pdgcs/documentazione/Report/2011-03-01_AllianceMozambique.pdf. Accessed 30 July 2014.
ProSavana–TEC. 2011. Projeto de melhoria da capacidade de pesquisa e de transferência de tecnologia para o desenvolvimento da agricultura no Corredor de Nacala em Moçambique, Maputo.
ProSavana–Project I. 2010. Project for improving research and technology transfer capacity for Nacala Corridor Agriculture Development, Mozambique, Maputo.
ProSavana. 2009. Minutes of Meeting on Triangular Cooperation for Agricultural Development of the Tropical Savannah in Mozambique, Maputo.
Rafael, A. 2011. O neocolonialismo brasileiro em Moçambique. http://www.opais.co.mz/index.php/analise/92-adelson-rafael/16099-o-neocolonialismo-brasileiro-em-mocambique.html. Accessed 11 Feb 2012.
Sakaguchi, Kota. 2012. Japan-Brazil Partnership Programme: A framework for Triangular Cooperation. In Scaling up South-South and Triangular Cooperation, ed. JICA. Tokyo: JICA Research Institute.
Shankland, Alex, and Euclides Gonçalves. 2016. Imagining agricultural development in South-South Cooperation: The contestation and transformation of ProSavana. World Development 81: 35–46.
Terra. 2011. Moçambique oferece terra barata para Brasileiros plantarem. http://noticias.terra.com.br/mocambique-oferece-terras-baratas-para-brasileiros-plantarem,5d48adb2075fa310VgnCLD200000bbcceb0aRCRD.html. Accessed 26 July 2014.
Economist, The. 2010. The miracle of the Cerrado. http://www.economist.com/node/16886442. Accessed 29 July 2014.
Topsoe-Jensen, Bente, et al. 2015. Mapping study of civil society organizations in Mozambique. ALTAIR Asesores and Agriconsulting.
UNAC. 2016. Moçambique: UNAC manifesta indignação e condena processo do ProSavana. http://alice.ces.uc.pt/news/?p=5069. Accessed 26 Feb 2016.
———. 2015. Comentários ao Plano Director Versão Draft Zero, Março de 2015, No contexto da campanha não ao ProSavana. http://farmlandgrab.org/post/view/25717-comentarios-ao-plano-director-versao-draft-zero-marco-de-2015-no-contexto-da-campanha-nao-ao-ProSavana. Accessed 23 Feb 2016.
———. 2014. Organizações da Sociedade internacionalizam campanha e prometem responsabilizar jurídicamente os actores do ProSavana. http://www.unac.org.mz/index.php/7-blog/87-organizacoes-da-sociedade-internacionalizam--a-campanha-e-prometem-responsabilizar-juridicamente-os-actores-doprosavana. Accessed 26 July 2014.
UNAC et al. 2013. Open Letter from Mozambican civil society organisations and movements to the presidents of Mozambique and Brazil and the Prime Minister of Japan. http://www.grain.org/bulletin_board/entries/4738-open-letter-from-mozambican-civil-society-organisations-and-movements-to-the-presidents-of-mozambique-and-brazil-and-the-prime-minister-of-japan. Accessed July 26, 2014.
UNAC. 2012. Land grabbing for agribusiness in Mozambique: UNAC statement on the ProSavana programme. http://viacampesina.org/en/index.php/main-issues-mainmenu-27/agrarian-reform-mainmenu-36/1321-land-grabbing-for-agribusiness-on-mozambique-unac-statement-on-the-ProSavana-programme. Accessed 3 Feb 2013.
Valler Filho, Wladimir. 2007. O Brasil e a crise haitiana: A cooperação técnica como instrumento de solidariedade e de ação diplomática. FUNAG: Brasilia.
Via Campesina, La. 2014. Mozambique: Civil society organizations decided to mobilize the “No to ProSavana” campaign and promise to give legal responsibility to ‘perpetrators’. International Peasants’ Movement. http://viacampesina.org/en/index.php/actions-and-events-mainmenu-26/stop-transnational-corporations-mainmenu-76/1643-mozambique-civil-society-organizations-decided-to-globalize-the-no-to-ProSavana-campaign-and-promise-to-give-legal-responsibility-to-perperators. Accessed 26 July 2014.
Vigevani, Tullo, and Gabriel Cepaluni. 2007. Lula’s foreign policy and the quest for autonomy through diversification. Third World Quarterly 28: 1309–1326.
Wise, Timothy. 2014. What happened to the biggest land grab in Africa? Searching for ProSavana in Mozambique. Foodtank. http://foodtank.com/news/2014/12/what-happened-to-the-biggest-land-grab-in-africa-searching-for-ProSavana-in. Accessed 6 Sep 2015.
WhampulaFax. 2016. Urge rever a estratégia do ProSavana. http://macua.blogs.com/moambique_para_todos/2016/01/urge-rever-a-estrat%C3%A9gia-do-ProSavana.html. Accessed 26 Feb 2016.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Durán, J., Chichava, S. (2017). Resisting South–South Cooperation? Mozambican Civil Society and Brazilian Agricultural Technical Cooperation. In: Bergamaschi, I., Moore, P., Tickner, A. (eds) South-South Cooperation Beyond the Myths. International Political Economy Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-53969-4_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-53969-4_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-53968-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-53969-4
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)