Skip to main content
  • 828 Accesses

Abstract

Arguably, in the last fourteen years, we have witnessed the ‘rise’ and ‘fall’ of an international norm called the Responsibility to Protect (R2P, also abbreviated as RtoP). When the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty (ICISS) introduced the ‘responsibility to protect’ to the international community in 2001, it followed the motto ‘never again’. In this vein, R2P prescribed states and the international community with three responsibilities—to prevent, to react, and to rebuild—enabling them to prevent or halt mass atrocities against populations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The slogan of ‘never again’ was first used in the aftermath of the Nuremberg Tribunals as a pledge not to experience the horrors of the Second World War again. Later, in the 1990s, such a call was reiterated upon the failure to prevent the Rwandan Genocide.

  2. 2.

    For reasons of brevity, hereinafter, I will refer to humanitarian military interventions as humanitarian interventions.

  3. 3.

    In tracing R2P’s progress, a minor but theoretical contribution is achieved first by revisiting Finnemore and Sikkink’s norm life-cycle scheme through introducing venue and negotiation as additional influences, and second by analysing the content and language of the UN Secretary-General ’s reports.

References

  • Brownlie, I. (1974). Humanitarian intervention. In J. N. Moore (Ed.), Law and civil war in the modern world. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bull, H. (1977). The anarchical society: A study of order in world politics. London: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Commission on Human Security. (2003). Human security now. New York: Commission on Human Security.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, G. (2006, March31). From humanitarian ıntervention to the responsibility to protect. Keynote Address to Symposium on Humanitarian Intervention, University of Wisconsin, Madison. Retrieved October 28, 2007, from http://www.crisisgroup.org/home/index.cfm?id=4060&l=1.

  • Hehir, A. (2010). The responsibility to protect: “Sound and fury signifying nothing”? International Relations, 24, 218–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hehir, A., & Murray, R. (2013). Libya: The responsibility to protect and the future of humanitarian intervention. Basingstoke, England: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty (ICISS). (2001a). The responsibility to protect: The report of the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty. Ottawa, Canada: International Development Research Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty (ICISS). (2001b). The responsibility to protect: Research, bibliography, background. Ottawa, Canada: International Development Research Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, R. H. (1992). The security dilemma in Africa. In B. Job (Ed.), The ınsecurity dilemma: National security of third world states. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaldor, M. (2008). Human security: Reflections on globalization and intervention. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaul, I. (1995). Peace needs no weapons: From military security to human security. The Ecumenical Review, 47(3), 313–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, G., & Murray, C. J. L. (2001–2002). Rethinking human security. Political Science Quarterly, 116(4), 585–610.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuruzzaman, M. (2013). The “responsibility to protect” doctrine: Revived in Libya, buried in Syria. Insight Turkey, 15(2), 57–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieff, D. (2011, November 7). R2P, R.I.P. The New York Times. Retrieved March 17, 2015, from http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/08/opinion/r2p-rip.html?_r=0.

  • Seybolt, T. B. (2008). Humanitarian military intervention: The conditions for success and failure. Norfolk, VA: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, N., & Tow, W. T. (2002). The utility of human security: Sovereignty and humanitarian intervention. Security Dialogue, 33(2), 177–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (UN). (2006, November 09). Delivering as one: Report of the secretary-general’s high-level panel. Retrieved July 01, 2015, from http://www.un.org/events/panel/resources/pdfs/HLP-SWC-FinalReport.pdf.

  • Wheeler, N. J. (2002). Saving strangers: Humanitarian intervention in international society. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gözen Ercan, P. (2016). Introduction. In: Debating the Future of the ‘Responsibility to Protect’. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-52427-0_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics