Abstract
Luke argues that the concept of “animal” occupies a logically basic position within rhetorical treatments of systemic domination. Analyzing four narrative interrogations of intra-human domination (human sacrifice in Iphigenia at Aulis, male supremacy in The Taming of the Shrew, race-based slavery in Uncle Tom’s Cabin, and worker exploitation in The Jungle), Luke shows how in each story human exploitation of nonhuman animals is accepted as appropriate and natural, and the presumed inferior status of the animal is unreflexively employed as a means of conceptualizing the human subordination under consideration. In addition to our efforts at the practical and philosophical levels, animal liberationists must also challenge the subordination of animals at the rhetorical level, offering alternative narratives of respect for all subjects, human and nonhuman.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Luke, B. (2016). Animal Subjects and the Logic of Human Domination. In: Cavalieri, P. (eds) Philosophy and the Politics of Animal Liberation. Political Philosophy and Public Purpose. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-52120-0_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-52120-0_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-52119-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-52120-0
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)