Abstract
This chapter focuses on the research practice in a behavioral economics laboratory setting. The ethnomethodological perspective is used to direct the attention to the ethnomethods or performative practices generating the situation in the laboratory. I outlined some detailed field observations to illustrate how economists not only produce laboratory situations in accordance with their research methods and the scientific rules of their epistemic community. I also show how these situations are challenged, tested, and sustained by the equally performative behavior of compliant or non-compliant participants, by carrot and stick through punishment and payment. I will argue that economists not only study but also (re-)produce the economic rational actor model and its defining elements. The economists’ rational actor thus matches the practices of his creation and has to be viewed as an empirical phenomenon from the ethnomethodological procedural perspective of ‘doing.’
I am grateful to the Berlin Social Science Research Center (WZB) for funding. I would like to thank Nina Bonge, Rustamdjan Hakimov, and the laboratory staff for teaching me how to act properly in the laboratory. I am especially grateful to Dorothea Kübler and Rustamdjan Hakimov for their openness to reflect about their own research practice and Michael Hutter who supported the sociological perspective in various stimulating discussions with our economic colleagues. Parts of the article base on a revisited version of Böhme (2015a).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
For a detailed discussion of methodological aspects, see Böhme (2015b).
References
Amann, Klaus. 1994. Menschen, Mäuse und Fliegen. Eine wissenssoziologische Analyse der Transformation von Organismen in epistemische Objekte. Zeitschrift für Soziologie 23(1): 22–40.
Böhme, Juliane. 2015a. ‘Doing’ Laborexperimente: Eine ethnomethodologische Betrachtung der Praxis experimenteller Wirtschaftsforschung im Labor. Berliner Journal für Soziologie 25(1): 33–59.
Böhme, Juliane. 2015b. Kombination von Grounded Theory und Ethnomethodologie. In Handbuch Grounded Theory—Von der Methodologie zur Forschungspraxis, edited by Claudia Equit and Christoph Hohage. Weinheim: Beltz Verlag (in print).
Callon, Michel. 1998. An Essay on Framing and Overflowing: Economic Externalities Revisited by Sociology. In The Laws of the Markets, edited by Michel Callon, 244–269. Oxford: Blackwell.
Camerer, Colin. 2003. Behavioral Game Theory: Experiments in Strategic Interaction. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Garfinkel, Harold. 1967. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Garfinkel, Harold, and Harvey Sacks. 1979. Über Formale Strukturen Praktischer Handlungen. In Ethnomethodologie. Beiträge zu einer Soziologie des Alltagshandels, edited by Elmar Weingarten, Fritz Sack, and Jim Schenkein, 130–176. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Gieryn, Thomas F. 2002. Three Truth Spots. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 38(2): 113–132.
Greiner, Ben. 2015. Subject pool recruitment procedures: Organizing experiments with ORSEE. Journal of the Economic Science Association, 1(1): 114–125.
Guala, Francesco. 2005. The Methodology of Experimental Economics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Guala, Francesco. 2007. How to Do Things with Experimental Economics. In Do Economists Make Markets? On the Performativity of Economics, edited by Donald MacKenzie, Fabian Muniesa, and Lucia Siu, 128–162. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Kahneman, Daniel, and Amos Tversky. 1981. The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice. Science 211: 453–458.
Knorr-Cetina, Karin. 1984. Die Fabrikation von Erkenntnis. Zur Anthropologie der Naturwissenschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Knorr-Cetina, Karin. 2002. Wissenskulturen. Ein Vergleich naturwissenschaftlicher Wissensformen. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Knorr-Cetina, Karin, and Michael Mulkay. 1983. Science Observed. Perspectives on the Social Study of Science. London: Sage.
Kübler, Dorothea. 2010. Experimental Practices in Economics: Performativity and the Creation of Phenomena. WZB Discussion Paper: SP II 2010-01.
Latour, Bruno, and Steve Woolgar. 1979. Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts. London: Sage.
Muniesa, Fabian, and Michel Callon. 2007. Economic Experiments and the Construction of Markets. In Do Economists Make Markets?: On the Performativity of Economics, edited by Donald MacKenzie, Fabian Muniesa, and Lucia Siu, 163–189. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Rawls, Anne W. 2006. Respecifying the Study of Social Order—Garfinkel’s Transition from the Theoretical Conceptualisation to Practices in Detail. In Seeing Sociologically: The Routine Grounds of Social Action, edited by Harold Garfinkel, 1–97. Boulder: Paradigm Publishers.
Simon, Herbert A. 1957. Models of Man, Social and Rational: Mathematical Essays on Rational Human Behavior in a Social Setting. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Smith, Vernon L. 1976. Experimental Economics: Induced Value Theory. American Economic Review 66(2): 274–279.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. [1953] 1971. Philosophische Untersuchungen. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Böhme, J. (2016). ‘Doing’ Laboratory Experiments: An Ethnomethodological Study of the Performative Practice in Behavioral Economic Research. In: Boldyrev, I., Svetlova, E. (eds) Enacting Dismal Science. Perspectives from Social Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-48876-3_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-48876-3_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-49210-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-48876-3
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)