Skip to main content

Relational Masculinities

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Masculinities and the Adult Male Prison Experience
  • 541 Accesses

Abstract

It has already been recognised that men are often feminised through the prison experience—having feminine dimensions of time, space, and corporeal spectacle imposed upon them. This also occurs through the very people that a male prisoner comes into contact with on a daily basis, even if those people are men, and even if their behaviours are perceived to be ‘hypermasculine’.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    ‘Burn’ is tobacco.

  2. 2.

    An interesting choice of words to use the term ‘manhandle’, yet this is symbolic of such interactions between prisoners and staff, and highlights some of the issues raised when female officers step into such a masculine role (Crewe 2006a).

  3. 3.

    In itself, the idea of ‘whinging’ is referential to a childlike behaviour, thereby highlighting the lack of adult autonomy ascribed to the male prisoner when incarcerated and dependent on others.

References

  • Clemmer, D. (1958). The prison community (Newth ed.). New York: Holt, Reinhart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, R. W. (2005). Masculinities (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawley, E. (2004). Doing prison work: The public and private lives of prison officers. Cullompton: Willan Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawley, E., & Crawley, P. (2008). Culture, performance, and disorder: The communicative quality of prison violence. In J. M. Byrne, D. Hummer, & F. S. Taxman (Eds.), The culture of prison violence. Boston: Pearson/Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crewe, B. (2005a). Prisoner society in the era of hard drugs. Punishment and Society, 7(4), 457–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crewe, B. (2005b). Codes and conventions: The terms and conditions of contemporary inmate values. In A. Liebling & S. Maruna (Eds.), The effects of imprisonment. Cullompton: Willan Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crewe, B. (2006a). Male prisoners’ orientations towards female officers in an English prison. Punishment and Society, 8(4), 395–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crewe, B. (2006b). The drugs economy and the prisoner society. In Y. Jewkes & H. Johnston (Eds.), Prison readings: A critical introduction to prisons and imprisonment. Cullompton: Willan Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crewe, B. (2006c). Prison drug dealing and the ethnographic lens. The Howard Journal, 45(4), 347–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crewe, B. (2007). Power, adaptation and resistance in a late modern men’s prison. British Journal of Criminology, 47(2), 256–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crewe, B. (2009). The prisoner society: Power, adaptation, and social life in an English prison. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, M. (1966). Purity and danger: An analysis of the concepts of pollution and taboo. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan, T. J. (1980). The pains of long-term imprisonment: A comparison of British and American perspectives. British Journal of Criminology, 20(2), 148–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fong, R. S. (1990). The organizational structure of prison gangs: A Texas case study. Federal Probation, 54(1), 36–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1961). Asylums: Essays on the social situation of mental patients and other inmates. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grapendaal, M. (1990). The inmate subculture in Dutch prisons. British Journal of Criminology, 30(3), 341–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greer, K. R. (2000). The changing nature of interpersonal relationships in a women’s prison. The Prison Journal, 80(4), 442–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayner, N. S., & Ash, E. (1939). The prisoner community as a social group. American Sociological Review, 4(3), 362–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irwin, J. (1970). The felon. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, C. (2002). ‘Laddishness’ as a self-worth protection strategy. Gender and Education, 14(1), 37–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, J. B. (1974). Street gangs behind bars. Social Problems, 21(3), 395–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jewkes, Y. (2002). Captive audience: Media, masculinity and power in prisons. Cullompton: Willan Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Julier, A., & Lindenfeld, L. (2005). Mapping men onto the menu: Masculinities and food. Food and Foodways: Explorations in the History and Culture of Human Nourishment, 13(1–2), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimmel, M. S. (1994). Masculinity as homophobia: Fear, shame, and silence in the construction of gender identity. In H. Brod & M. Kaufman (Eds.), Theorizing masculinities. Thousand Oaks and London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liebling, A., & Arnold, H. (2002). Measuring the quality of prison life (Home Office Findings No. 174). London: Home Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liebling, A., & Arnold, H. (2004). Prisons and their moral performance. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liebling, A., & Price, D. (1999). An exploration of staff-prisoner relationships at HMP Whitemoor. London: Prison Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • McPhail, D., Beagan, B., & Chapman, G. E. (2012). “I Don't Want to be Sexist But…” denying and re-inscribing gender through food. Food, Culture and Society, 15(3), 473–489.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messerschmidt, J. W. (1993). Masculinities and crime. Maryland: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, T., & Morris, P. (1963). Pentonville: A sociological study of an English Prison. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, C. (2008). Negotiating identities: Ethnicity and social relations in a young offenders’ institution. Theoretical Criminology, 12(3), 313–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Platek, M. (1990). Prison subculture in Poland. International Journal of the Sociology of Law, 18, 459–472.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sibley, D., & van Hoven, B. (2009). The contamination of personal space: Boundary construction in a prison environment. Area, 41(2), 198–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sim, J. (1994). Tougher than the rest? Men in prison. In T. Newburn & E. A. Stanko (Eds.), Just boys doing business? Men, masculinities and crime. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sloan, J. (2012a). ‘You Can See Your Face in My Floor’: Examining the function of cleanliness in an adult male prison. The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 51(4), 400–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sloan, J. (2012b). Cleanliness, spaces and masculine identity in an adult male prison. Prison Service Journal, 201, 3–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sloan, J. (2015). Masculinity, imprisonment and working identities. In C. Reeves (Ed.), Experiencing imprisonment: Research on the experience of living and working in carceral institution. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sloan, J., & Wright, S. (2015). Going in green: Reflections on the challenges of ‘getting in, getting on, and getting out’ for doctoral researchers. In D. H. Drake, R. Earle, & J. Sloan (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of prison ethnography. Palgrave Macmillan: Basingstoke.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobal, J. (2005). Men, meat, and marriage: Models of masculinity. Food and Foodways: Explorations in the History and Culture of Human Nourishment, 13(1-2), 135–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sykes, G. (1958). The society of captives: A study of a maximum security prison (2007th ed.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sykes, G. M., & Messinger, S. L. (1960). The inmate social system. In R. A. Cloward (Ed.), Theoretical studies in social organisation of the prison. New York: Social Science Research Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walmsley, R., Howard, L., & White, S. (1992). The National Prison Survey 1991 Main Findings (Home Office Research Study 128). London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). Doing gender. Gender and Society, 1(2), 125–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, S. (1961). Socialization in correctional communities. American Sociological Review, 26(5), 697–712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winfree, L. T., Jr., Newbold, G., & Houston Tubb, S., III. (2002). Prisoner perspectives on inmate culture in New Mexico and New Zealand: A descriptive case study. The Prison Journal, 82(2), 213–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woolf (Rt Hon Lord Justice) & Tumin (His Honour Judge). (1991). Prison disturbances April 1990: Report of an inquiry, Cm 1456. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sloan, J.A. (2016). Relational Masculinities. In: Masculinities and the Adult Male Prison Experience. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-39915-1_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-39915-1_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-39914-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-39915-1

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics