Skip to main content
Log in

A sociological look at the evolution of recent scholarship on ethnic conflicts

  • Published:
Journal of International Relations and Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is commonly held that there was increased scholarly interest in ethnic conflicts following the end of the Cold War, though what this greater interest has meant in terms of the evolution of this subfield in subsequent decades has rarely been studied. To fill this gap, this article looks at all articles (n = 246) on the causes of ethnic conflicts, out of a total of 20,105 articles published in 30 key journals between 1990 and 2012. Adopting a sociological stance, it argues that the subfield expanded over the period. However, ethnic conflict literature appears to have been at key points largely driven by external factors. There is also indication that duels as opposed to dialogue were the modus operandi for this period. Overall, the broad notion of expansion needs to be nuanced in light of some concerning trends behind the subfield’s sociological evolution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arfi, Badredine (1998) ‘Ethnic Fear: The Social Construction of Insecurity’, Security Studies 8(1): 151–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, Terence (1987) ‘Is There Progress in Political Science’, in Terence Ball, ed, Idioms of Inquiry: Critique and Renewal in Political Science, 13–44, Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belcher, Wendy Laura (2009) Writing Your Journal Article in 12 Weeks: A Guide to Academic Publishing Success, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Björk, Bo-Christer and David Solomon (forthcoming) ‘The Publishing Delay in Scholarly Peer-Reviewed Journals’, from http://openaccesspublishing.org/oa11/article.pdf, accessed on 3 June, 2015.

  • Brown, Michael E., Owen R. Cote, Sean M. Lynn Jones and Steven E. Miller, eds (1993) Nationalism and Ethnic Conflict, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brubaker, Rogers and David D. Laitin (1998) ‘Ethnic and Nationalist Violence’, Annual Review of Sociology 24: 423–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buzan, Barry and Lene Hansen (2009) The Evolution of International Security Studies, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chernoff, Fred (2004) ‘The Study of Democratic Peace and Progress in International Relations’, International Studies Review 6(1): 49–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collier, Paul and Anke Hoeffler (1999) Greed and Grievance in Civil War, Washington: World Bank.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cordell, Karl and Stefan Wolff (2010) Ethnic Conflict, Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desrosiers, Marie-Eve (2012) ‘Reframing Frame Analysis: Key Contributions to Conflict Studies’, Ethnopolitics 11(1): 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duffy Toft, Monica (2005) The Geography of Ethnic Violence: Identity, Interests, and the Indivisibility of Territory, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunne, Tim, Lene Hansen and Colin Wight (2013) ‘The End of International Relations Theory’, European Journal of International Relations 19(3): 405–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elman, Colin and Miriam Fendius Elman (2002) ‘How not to Be Lakatos Intolerant: Appraising Progress in IR Research’, International Studies Quarterly 46(2): 231–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elman, Colin and Miriam Fendius Elman, eds (2003) Progress in International Relations Theory, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fearon, James D. (1995) ‘Rationalist Explanations of War’, International Organization 49(3): 379–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fearon, James D. and David D. Laitin (2000) ‘Violence and the Social Construction of Ethnic Identity’, International Organization 54(4): 845–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fearon, James D. and David D. Laitin (2003) ‘Ethnicity, Insurgency, and Civil War’, American Political Science Review 97(1): 75–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flyvbjerg, Bent (2006) ‘Five Misunderstandings about Case-Study Research’, Qualitative Inquiry 12(2): 219–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gat, Azar (2009) ‘So Why Do People Fight? Evolutionary Theory and the Causes of War’, European Journal of International Relations 15(4): 571–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geller, Daniel S. and John A. Vasquez (2004) ‘The Construction and Cumulation of Knowledge in International Relations: Introduction’, International Studies Review 6(4): 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, Donald and Ian Shapiro (2005) ‘Revisiting the Pathologies of Rational Choice’, in Ian Shapiro, ed., The Flight from Reality in the Human Sciences, 51–99, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunnell, John G. (1991) ‘The Historiography of American Political Science’, in David Easton, John G. Gunnell and Luigi Graziano, eds, The Development of Political Science: A Comparative Survey, 13–33, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurr, Ted Robert and Barbara Harff (1994) Ethnic Conflict in World Politics, Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollis, Martin and Steve Smith (1991) Explaining and Understanding International Relations, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holsti, Kalevi J. (1996) The State, War, and the State of War, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Horowitz, Donald L. (1999) ‘Structure and Strategy in Ethnic Conflict: A Few Steps Towards a Synthesis’, in Boris Pleskovic and Joseph E. Stiglitz, eds, Annual World Bank Conference on Development Economics 1998, 345–70, Washington: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, Patrick (2002) International Relations and Scientific Progress: Structural Realism Reconsidered, Columbus: Ohio State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaldor, Mary (1998) New and Old Wars: Organized Violence in a Global Era, Oxford: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, Stuart J. (2001) Modern Hatreds: The Symbolic Politics of Ethnic War, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, Stuart J. (2006) ‘Symbolic Politics or Rational Choice? Testing Theories of Extreme Ethnic Violence’, International Security 30(4): 45–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, Stuart J. (2011) ‘Symbols, Frames, and Violence: Studying Ethnic War in the Philippines’, International Studies Quarterly 55(4): 937–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lake, David A. and Donald Rothchild (1996) ‘Containing Fear: The Origins and Management of Ethnic Conflict’, International Security 21(2): 41–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, Adria (2010) ‘Triggering Nationalist Violence: Competition and Conflict in Uprisings Against Colonial Rule’, International Security 35(2): 88–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Losee, John (2004) Theories of Scientific Progress: An Introduction, New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Maliniak, Daniel, Amy Oakes, Susan Peterson and Michael J. Tierney (2011) ‘International Relations in the US Academy’, International Studies Quarterly 55(2): 437–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mousseau, Demet Yalcin (2001) ‘Democratizing with Ethnic Divisions: A Source of Conflict’, Journal of Peace Research 38(5): 547–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, Brian J. (2014) ‘Ranking IR Journals’, Duck of Minerva, 7 January, from http://www.duckofminerva.com/2014/01/ranking-ir-journals.html, accessed on 6 July, 2015.

  • Posen, Barry R. (1993) ‘The Security Dilemma and Ethnic Conflict’, Survival 35(1): 27–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynal-Querol, Marta (2002) ‘Ethnicity, Political Systems, and Civil Wars’, Journal of Conflict Resolution 46(1): 29–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, Marc Howard (1997) ‘The Relevance of Culture for the Study of Political Psychology and Ethnic Conflict’, Political Psychology 18(2): 299–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, Marc Howard (2006) ‘Bringing Culture Back In’, International Studies Review 8(4): 674–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, Marc Howard (2007) Cultural Contestation in Ethnic Conflict, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, Brian C. (1998) The Political Discourse of Anarchy: A Disciplinary History of International Relations, Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, Brian C. (2012) ‘On the History and Historiography of International Relations’ in Walter Carlnaes, Thomas Risse and Beth A. Simmons, eds, Handbook of International Relations, second edition, 3–28, London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sil, Rudra and Peter J. Katzenstein (2010) Beyond Paradigms: Analytic Eclecticism in the Study of World Politics, New York: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sillanpää, Antti and Tommi Koivula (2010) ‘Mapping Conflict Research: A Bibliometric Study of Contemporary Scientific Discourses’, International Studies Perspectives 11(2): 148–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simowitz, Roslyn and Barry L. Price (1990) ‘The Expected Utility Theory of Conflict: Measuring Theoretical Progress’, American Political Science Review 84(2): 439–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Themnér, Lotta and Peter Wallensteen (2013) ‘Armed Conflicts, 1946–2012’, Journal of Peace Research 50(4): 509–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Belle, Douglas A. (2006) ‘Dinosaurs and the Democratic Peace: Paleontological Lessons for Avoiding the Extinction of Theory in Political Science’, International Studies Perspectives 9(1): 287–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waever, Ole (1998) ‘The Sociology of a Not So International Discipline: American and European Developments in International Relations’, International Organization 52(4): 687–727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waever, Ole (2010) ‘Still a Discipline After All these Debates?’ in Tim Dunne, Milja Kurki and Steve Smith, eds, International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity, second edition, 297–318, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wedeen, Lisa (2002) ‘Conceptualizing Culture: Possibilities for Political Science’, American Political Science Review 96(4): 713–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, Joseph K. and Michael G. Findley (2011) ‘Promise and Pitfalls of Terrorism Research’, International Studies Review 13(3): 411–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author thanks Jean-Christophe Boucher, Christian Desrosiers, Philippe Lagassé, Geranda Notten, Steve Saideman, Nasser Ary Tanimoune, Srdjan Vucetic and Christoph Zuercher for insights and comments. She also thanks Caroline Roy and Di Chen for help with data collection and processing, as well as three anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments. The usual disclaimers apply.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marie-Eve Desrosiers.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Desrosiers, ME. A sociological look at the evolution of recent scholarship on ethnic conflicts. J Int Relat Dev 21, 580–607 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41268-016-0077-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41268-016-0077-6

Keywords

Navigation