Skip to main content
Log in

The governance impact of a changing investor landscape

  • Published:
Journal of International Business Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Within the backdrop of comparative corporate governance research, we draw on the managerial reporting and impression management literatures to examine how the type, level, and nature of foreign shareholders, infused with their own governance logic, influence initial managerial earnings optimism and how foreign ownership shapes earnings guidance in a stakeholder-oriented setting. Drawing on Japanese data, and addressing endogeneity concerns, our results show that under the presence of foreign owners, managers are more optimistic in their initial earnings forecasts, but that in subsequent revisions they are more likely to provide timely adjustments of their earnings forecast and avoid making last-minute adjustments. This research illustrates how foreign practices travel across borders and contributes to understanding triggers to governance and strategic changes.

Résumé

Dans le contexte de la recherche comparative sur la gouvernance d’entreprise, nous nous appuyons sur les littératures relatives au reporting managérial et la gestion de l’impression pour examiner comment le type, le niveau et la nature des actionnaires étrangers, plongés dans leur propre logique de gouvernance, influencent l’optimisme initial relatif aux bénéfices managériaux et comment la propriété étrangère forme les résultats prévisionnels dans un contexte orienté vers les parties prenantes. Nous appuyant sur des données japonaises, et répondant aux préoccupations sur l’endogénéité, nos résultats montrent qu’en présence de propriétaires étrangers, les dirigeants sont plus optimistes concernant les prévisions initiales sur les résultats, mais que dans les révisions subséquentes, ils sont plus susceptibles d’apporter des ajustements en temps voulu sur leurs prévisions de bénéfices et évitent de faire des ajustements de dernière minute. Cette recherche illustre comment des pratiques étrangères dépassent les frontières et contribue à comprendre les déclencheurs des changements de gouvernance et stratégiques.

Resumen

Dentro del contexto de la investigación de gobierno corporativo comparado, nos basamos en las literaturas de reportes de gestión y gestión de la impresión para examinar como el tipo, el nivel, y la naturaleza de los accionistas extranjeros, infundidos con su propia lógica de gobierno, influyen en el optimismo inicial de ganancias gerenciales y como la propiedad extranjera da forma a la previsión de beneficios en un entorno orientado por los grupos de interés. Basados en datos japoneses, y abordando las preocupaciones de endogeneidad, nuestros resultados muestran que ante la presencia de dueños extranjeros, los gerentes son más optimistas en sus previsiones de ganancias iniciales, pero que en las revisiones posteriores es más probable que proporcionen oportunamente ajustes de su pronóstico de ganancias y eviten hacer ajustes de último minuto. Esta investigación ilustra como las prácticas extranjeras viajan entre las fronteras y contribuyen a entender desencadenantes a la gobernanza y a cambios estratégicos.

Resumo

Dentro do cenário de uma pesquisa comparada sobre governança corporativa, nós nos baseamos na literatura sobre comunicação gerencial e gestão de impressão para examinar como o tipo, o nível e a natureza dos acionistas estrangeiros, imersos nas suas suas próprias lógicas de governança, influenciam o otimismo gerencial inicial sobre lucros e como a propriedade estrangeira molda a orientação para lucros em um ambiente voltado para stakeholders. Baseando-se em dados japoneses e considerando preocupações sobre endogeneidade, nossos resultados mostram que, sob a presença de proprietários estrangeiros, os gestores são mais otimistas nas suas previsões iniciais de lucros, mas em revisões posteriores eles são mais propensos a fornecer ajustes na sua previsão de lucros e evitar fazer ajustes de última hora. Essa pesquisa ilustra como práticas estrangeiras viajam através das fronteiras e contribuem para a compreensão gatilhos para a governança e mudanças estratégicas.

概要

在公司治理比较研究的背景下,我们借鉴管理报表和印象管理文献来研究外国股东的类型、级别和性质,经过融入他们自己的治理逻辑,如何影响初始管理收益乐观性和外国所有权如何在面向利益相关者的设置中塑造收益指导。借鉴日本的数据,并解决内生性的问题,我们的研究结果表明,在外国股东存在的情况下,经理人更看好他们的初始收益预测,但在后续的修正中他们更有可能进行收益预测的及时调整,并避免做最后一分钟的调整。这项研究说明国外做法是如何跨越国界的,并有助于理解治理和战略变化的触发器。

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aggarwal, R., Erel, I., Ferreira, M., & Matos, P. 2011. Does governance travel around the world? Evidence from institutional investors. Journal of Financial Economics, 100(1): 154–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aguilera, R. V., Desender, K., Bednar, M. K., & Lee, J. H. 2015. Connecting the dots: Bringing external corporate governance into the corporate governance puzzle. Academy of Management Annals, 9(1): 483–573.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aguilera, R. V., Filatotchev, I., Gospel, H., & Jackson, G. 2008. An organizational approach to comparative corporate governance: Costs, contingencies, and complementarities. Organization Science, 19(3): 475–492.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aguilera, R. V., & Jackson, G. 2003. The cross-national diversity of corporate governance: Dimensions and determinants. Academy of Management Review, 28(3): 447–465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmadjian, C. L., & Robbins, G. E. 2005. A clash of capitalisms: Foreign shareholders and corporate restructuring in 1990s Japan. American Sociological Review, 70(3): 451–471.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmadjian, C. L., & Robinson, P. 2001. Safety in numbers: Downsizing and the deinstitutionalization of permanent employment in Japan. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(4): 622–654.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ajinkya, B., Bhojraj, S., & Sengupta, P. 2005. The association between outside directors, institutional investors and the properties of management earnings forecasts. Journal of Accounting Research, 43(3): 343–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, R., Kothari, S. P., & Robin, A. 2000. The effect of international institutional factors on properties of accounting earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 29(1): 1–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton, J., & Simko, P. J. 2002 The balance sheet as an earnings management constraint. The Accounting Review, 77: 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bena, J., Ferreira, A. M., Matos, P., & Pires, P. 2015. Are foreign investors locusts? The long-term effects of foreign institutional ownership. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2640045. Accessed September 20, 2016.

  • Berry, H., Guillen, M. F., & Zhou, N. 2010. An institutional approach to cross-national distance. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(9): 1460–1480.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilinski, P., Cumming, D. J., Hass, L. H., Stathopoulos, K., & Walker, M. 2015. Strategic distortions in analyst target prices in the presence of short-term institutional investors. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2579576. Accessed September 20, 2016.

  • Boone, A. L., & White, J. T. 2015. The effect of institutional ownership on firm transparency and information production. Journal of Financial Economics, 117(3): 508–533.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J., Chai, D. H., & Deakin, S. F. 2012. Hedge fund activism in Japan: The limits of shareholder primacy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, P. J. 1997. Cooperative form of transnational corporation activity. In J. H. Dunning & K. P. Sauvant (Eds), Transnational corporations and world development (pp. 473–493). London: Thomson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bundy, J., & Pfarrer, M. D. 2015. A burden of responsibility: The role of social approval at the onset of a crisis. Academy of Management Review, 40(3): 345–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bundy, J., Shropshire, C., & Buchholtz, A. K. 2013. Strategic cognition and issue salience: Toward an explanation of firm responsiveness to stakeholder concerns. Academy of Management Review, 38(3): 352–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bushee, B. J., & Noe, C. F. 2000. Corporate disclosure practices, institutional investors, and stock return volatility. Journal of Accounting Research, 38: 171–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, S., Matsumoto, D., & Rajgopal, S. 2011. Is silence golden? An empirical analysis of firms that stop giving quarterly earnings guidance. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 51(1–2): 134–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chizema, A., & Shinozawa, Y. 2012. The ‘company with committees’: Change or continuity in Japanese corporate governance? Journal of Management Studies, 49(1): 77–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cotter, J., Tuna, I., & Wysocki, P. D. 2006. Expectations management and beatable targets: How do analysts react to explicit earnings guidance? Contemporary Accounting Research, 23(3): 593–624.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cumming, D., & Walz, U. 2010. Private equity returns and disclosure around the world. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(4): 727–754.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dai, N., & Nahata, R. 2016. Cultural differences and cross-border venture capital syndication. Journal of International Business Studies, 47(2): 140–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • David, P., Hitt, M., & Gimeno, J. 2001. The role of activism by institutional investors in influencing R&D. Academy of Management Journal, 44: 144–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • David, P., O’Brien, J. P., Yoshikawa, T., & Delios, A. 2010. Do shareholders or stakeholders appropriate the rents from corporate diversification? The influence of ownership structure. Academy of Management Journal, 53(3): 636–654.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desender, K., Aguilera, R. V., López-Puertas Lamy, M., & Crespí, R. 2016. a clash of governance logics: Foreign ownership and board monitoring. Strategic Management Journal, 37(2): 349–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyck, A., Lins, K. V., Roth, L., & Wagner, H. F. 2015. Do institutional investors drive corporate social responsibility? International evidence. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2708589. Accessed September 20, 2016.

  • Edelman, L. B. 1992. Legal ambiguity and symbolic structures: Organizational mediation of civil rights law. American Journal of Sociology, 97(6): 1531–1576.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elsbach, K. D. 1994. Managing organizational legitimacy in the California cattle industry: The construction and effectiveness of verbal accounts. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(1): 57–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira, M. A., & Matos, P. 2008. The colors of investors’ money: The role of institutional investors around the world. Journal of Financial Economics, 88(3): 499–533.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaspar, J.-M., Massa, M., & Matos, P. 2005. Shareholder investment horizons and the market for corporate control. Journal of Financial Economics, 76(1): 135–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaspar, J.-M., Massa, M., Matos, P., Patgiri, R., & Rehman, Z. 2013. Payout policy choices and shareholder investment horizons. Review of Finance, 17(1): 261–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelfand, M. J., Nishii, L. H., Holcombe, K. M., Dyer, N., Ohbuchi, K.-I., & Fukuno, M. 2001. Cultural influences on cognitive representations of conflicts: Interpretations of conflict episodes in the United States and Japan. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(6): 1059–1074.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geng, X., Yoshikawa, T., & Colpan, A. M. 2016. Leveraging foreign institutional logic in the adoption of stock option pay among Japanese firms. Strategic Management Journal, 37(7): 1472–1492.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goranova, M., & Ryan, L. V. 2014. Shareholder activism: A multidisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 40(5): 1230–1268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graves, S. B., & Waddock, S. A. 1994. Institutional owners and corporate social performance. Academy of Management Journal, 37(4): 1034–1046.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guillen, M. F., & Capron, L. 2016. State capacity, minority shareholder protections, and stock market development. Administrative Science Quarterly, 61(1): 125–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P. A., & Soskice, D. 2001. Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrmann, D., Inoue, T., & Thomas, W. B. 2003. The sale of assets to manage earnings in Japan. Journal of Accounting Research, 41(1): 89–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houston, J. F., Lev, B., & Tucker, J. W. 2010. To guide or not to guide? Causes and consequences of stopping quarterly earnings guidance. Contemporary Accounting Research, 27(1): 143–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, S. N. 1994. Top executive rewards and firm performance: A comparison of Japan and the United States. Journal of Political Economy, 102(3): 510–546.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karamanou, I., & Vafeas, N. 2005. The association between corporate boards, audit committees, and management earnings forecasts: An empirical analysis. Journal of Accounting Research, 43(3): 453–486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kato, K., Skinner, D. J., & Kunimura, M. 2009. Management forecasts in Japan: An empirical study of forecasts that are effectively mandated. The Accounting Review, 84(5): 1575–1606.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, R., Pownall, G., & Waymire, G. 1990. Expectations adjustments via timely management forecasts: Review, synthesis, and suggestions for future research. Journal of Accounting Literature, 9(1): 113–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. 2000. Investor protection and corporate governance. Journal of Financial Economics, 58(1–2): 3–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leuz, C., Lins, K. V., & Warnock, F. E. 2009. Do foreigners invest less in poorly governed firms? Review of Financial Studies, 23(3): 3245–3285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, J. R., & Gerlach, M. L. 2004. Japan’s network economy: Structure, persistence, and change. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsumoto, D. A. 2002. Management’s incentives to avoid negative earnings surprises. The Accounting Review, 77(3): 483–514.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNichols, M. 1989. Evidence of informational asymmetries from management earnings forecasts and stock returns. The Accounting Review, 64(1): 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • MSCI. 2015. Annual Report. New York: MSCI.

  • MSCI. 2016. Annual Report and Proxies. http://www.annualreports.com/Company/msci-inc.

  • Neubaum, D. O., & Zahra, S. A. 2006. Institutional ownership and corporate social performance: The moderating effects of investment horizon, activism, and coordination. Journal of Management, 32(1): 108–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ota, K. 2011. Analysts' awarness of systematic bias in management earnings forecasts. Applied Financial Economics, 21(8): 1317–1330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfarrer, M. D., Pollock, T. G., & Rindova, V. P. 2010. A tale of two assets: The effects of firm reputation and celebrity on earnings surprises and investors’ reactions. Academy of Management Journal, 53(5): 1131–1152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfarrer, M. D., Smith, K. G., Bartol, K. M., Khanin, D. M., & Zhang, X. 2008. Coming forward: The effects of social and regulatory forces on the voluntary restatement of earnings subsequent to wrongdoing. Organization Science, 19(3): 386–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, S., Teoh, S. H., & Wysocki, P. D. 2004. The walk-down to beatable analyst forecasts: The role of equity issuance and insider trading incentives. Contemporary Accounting Research, 21(4): 885–924.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. 1997. A survey of corporate governance. Journal of Finance, 52(2): 737–783.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, D. J. 1994. Why firms voluntarily disclose bad news. Journal of Accounting Research, 32(1): 38–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stocken, P. C. 2000. Credibility of voluntary disclosure. The Rand Journal of Economics, 31(2): 359–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugathan, A., & George, R. 2015. The influence of governance infrastructure and corporate governance on profit shifting. Journal of International Business Studies, 46(8): 886–916.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tokyo Stock Exchange. 2008. Annual Report. Tokyo.

  • Trueman, B. 1986. Why do managers voluntarily release earnings forecasts? Journal of Accounting and Economics, 8(1): 53–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verrecchia, R. E. 2001. Essays on disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 32(1–3): 97–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoshii, K. 2012. TSE relaxed earnings forecast disclosure rules (Vol. 12). New York: Daiwa Institute of Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoshikawa, T., & McGuire, J. 2008. Change and continuity in Japanese corporate governance. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 25(1): 5–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoshikawa, T., Phan, P. H., & David, P. 2005. The impact of ownership structure on wage intensity in Japanese corporations. Journal of Management, 31(2): 278–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, Y. 2010. The effect of CEO tenure on CEO compensation: Evidence from inside CEOs vs outside CEOs. Managerial Finance, 36(10): 832–859.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ruth V. Aguilera.

Additional information

Accepted by Douglas Cumming, Guest Editor, on 1 September 2016. This article has been with the authors for two revisions.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aguilera, R.V., Desender, K.A., Lamy, M.LP. et al. The governance impact of a changing investor landscape. J Int Bus Stud 48, 195–221 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-016-0043-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-016-0043-y

Keywords

Navigation