Skip to main content
Log in

Selection ability, timing ability, and performance persistence of Indian fixed income mutual funds

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Asset Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, we evaluate performance of the Indian fixed income mutual funds using a comprehensive sample of funds over a period from April 2015 to March 2020. We examine selection ability, market timing ability and persistence of performance of 254 fixed income funds across 16 fund categories. Using monthly holding period returns for the fund and 22 different benchmarks, we assess (a) selection ability of funds using single- and multi-factor models; (b) timing ability of funds using Treynor-Mazuy model; and (c) performance persistence of funds using recursive portfolio formation test. Our findings indicate inferior securities selection ability, positive market timing ability for some intermediate duration and longer duration funds, and positive performance persistence for the top-decile and bottom-decile funds. Findings also indicate that credit spread has a stronger role than term spread in performance of Indian fixed income funds. This is possibly the first comprehensive study that examines the performance of Indian fixed income mutual funds and contributes to the growing body of research on performance evaluation of fixed income funds. In light of the prominence of fixed income securities, the findings of this study are all the more pertinent to investors, asset management companies and policy-makers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Source: Investment Company Institute (ICI)

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. For our purposes, we consider a large enough Jensen’s alpha to be economically significant as it gives sufficient risk-adjusted return. We deem an annualized Jensen’s alpha greater than 0.25% to be economically significant. This is because the fund management fee of 0.25% is the prevailing norm in the Indian fixed income mutual funds industry (Adajania 2017).

References

  • Adajania, Kayezad. 2017. How important are expense ratios to debt funds? Livemint, August 9.

  • Ayadi, M., and L. Kryzanowski. 2011. Fixed income fund performance; Role of luck and ability in tail membership. Journal of Empirical Finance 18 (3): 379–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayadi, M., S. Lazrak, Y. Liao, and R. Welch. 2018. Performance of fixed income mutual funds with regime switching models. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance 69: 217–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blake, Christopher, Edward Elton, and Martin Gruber. 1993. The performance of bond mutual funds. Journal of Business 66 (3): 371–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boney, V., G. Comer, and L. Kelly. 2009. Timing the Investment grade securities market: Evidence from high quality bond funds. Journal of Empirical Finance 16 (1): 55–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, D., and W. Marshall. 2001. Assessing fixed income manager style and performance from historical returns. Journal of Fixed Income 10 (4): 15–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carhart, M. 1997. On persistence in mutual fund performance. The Journal of Finance 52 (1): 57–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y., W.E. Ferson, and H. Peters. 2010. Measuring the timing ability and performance of bond mutual funds. Journal of Financial Economics 98 (1): 72–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, J., and M. Kronlund. 2018. Reaching for yield in corporate bond mutual funds. The Review of Financial Studies 31 (5): 1930–1965.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cici, G., and S. Gibson. 2012. The performance of corporate bond mutual funds: Evidence based on security level holdings. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 47 (1): 159–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clare, A., N. O’Sullivan, M. Sherman, and S. Zhu. 2019. The Performance of US bond mutual funds. International Review of Financial Analysis 61 (1): 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comer, G. 2006. Hybrid mutual funds and market timing performance. The Journal of Business 79 (2): 771–797.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Detzler, M. 1999. The performance of global bond mutual funds. Journal of Banking and Finance 23 (8): 1195–1217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dietze, L., O. Entrop, and M. Wilkens. 2009. The performance of investment grade corporate bond funds: Evidence from the European market. The European Journal of Finance 15 (2): 191–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Droms, W., and D. Walker. 2006. Performance persistence of fixed income mutual funds. Journal of Economics and Finance 30 (3): 347–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du, D., Z. Huang, and P. Blanchfield. 2009. Do fixed income mutual fund managers have managerial skills?. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance 49 (2): 378–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elton, E., M. Gruber, and C. Blake. 1995. Fundamental variables, APT and bond fund performance. Journal of Finance 50 (4): 1229–1256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elyasiani, E., and J. Jia. 2011. Performance persistence of closed-end funds. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting 37 (3): 381–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henriksson, Roy, and Robert Merton. 1981. On market timing and investment performance. Working Paper. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Alfred P. Sloan School of Management, April 1.

  • Christensen, M. 2005. Danish mutual fund performance: Selectivity, market timing and persistence. Working Paper F-2005-01. Arhus: Arhus School of Business.

  • Gutierrez, R., W. Maxwell , and D. Xu. 2008. Persistent performance in corporate bond mutual funds. Working Paper. University of Oregon.

  • Moneta, F. 2008. Measuring bond mutual fund performance with portfolio characteristics. Working Paper. Boston College.

  • Rohleder, M., H., Scholz, and M., Wilkens. 2015. Disappearance and survivorship bias of corporate bond funds. Working Paper. University of Augsburg.

  • Adajania, K. 2017. How important are expense ratios to debt funds?. Livemint 9: 9–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E., and K. French. 2010. Luck versus skill in the cross-section of mutual fund returns. The Journal of Finance 65 (5): 1915–1947.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferson, W., T. Henry, and D. Kisgen. 2006. Evaluating government bond fund performance with stochastic discount factor. The Review of Financial Studies 19 (2): 423–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, D., and E. Jarnecic. 2002. The performance of active Australian bond funds. Australian Journal of Management 27 (2): 163–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallo, J., R. Buttimer Jr., L. Lockwood, and R. Rutherford. 1997. Determinants of performance of mortgage-backed security funds. Real Estate Economics 25 (4): 17–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, J., and Y. Wang. 2014. Timing ability of government bond fund managers: Evidence from portfolio holdings. Management Science 60 (8): 2091–2109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huij, J., and J. Derwall. 2008. Hot Hands’ in bond funds. Journal of Banking and Finance 32 (4): 559–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, Ronald, and Andrew Rudd. 1995. Does historical performance predict future performance?. Financial Analysts Journal 51 (6): 43–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipton, A., and R. Kisch. 2010. Robust performance measures for high yield bond funds. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance 50 (3): 332–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maag, F., and H. Zimmermann. 2000. On Benchmarks and performance of DEM bond mutual funds. Journal of Fixed Income 10 (3): 31–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Philpot, J., D. Hearth, J. Rimbey, and C. Schulman. 1998. Active management, fund size, and bond mutual fund returns. The Financial Review 33 (2): 115–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Philpot, J., D. Hearth, and J. Rimbey. 2000. Performance persistence and management skill in non-conventional bond mutual funds. Financial Services Review 9 (3): 247–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polwitoon, S., and O. Tawatnuntachai. 2006. Diversification benefits and persistence of US based global bond funds. Journal of Banking and Finance 30 (10): 2767–2786.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polwitoon, S., and O. Tawatnuntachai. 2008. Emerging market bond funds; A comprehensive analysis. The Financial Review 43 (1): 51–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silva, F., M. Cortez, and M. Armada. 2003. Conditioning information and European bond fund performance. European Financial Management 9 (2): 201–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silva, F., M. Cortez, and M. Armada. 2005. The persistence of European bond fund performance: Does conditioning information matter?. International Journal of Business 10 (4): 341–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trainor, W. 2010. Performance measurement of high yield bond mutual funds. Management Research and Review 33 (6): 609–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treynor, J., and K. Mazuy. 1966. Can mutual funds outguess the market?. Harvard Business Review 44 (4): 131–136.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mayank Patel.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Patel, M., Madhavan, V. & Das Gupta, S. Selection ability, timing ability, and performance persistence of Indian fixed income mutual funds. J Asset Manag 23, 46–61 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41260-021-00253-x

Download citation

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41260-021-00253-x

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation