Skip to main content
Log in

Dealing with Stakeholders: How Reputation, Credibility and Framing Influence the Game

  • Paper
  • Published:
Corporate Reputation Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Reputation is clearly a growing area of research and practitioner interest. Models that assist in our understanding of research and that aid practitioners in managing reputation are to be encouraged. In this paper, a model of reputation formation is proposed and the notion of reputation in issue, stake-holder, and process areas is addressed. Examples of these elements of reputation are offered, to help sharpen our understanding of reputation in action. In addition, the impact of credibility and framing on reputation is closely reviewed. Credibility refers to the organization's past history and how it develops reputational expectations over time. Framing is a process of ordering beliefs around an issue. In this paper, three questions are raised for consideration and suggestions are offered for further research and practitioner action.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mahon, J., Wartick, S. Dealing with Stakeholders: How Reputation, Credibility and Framing Influence the Game. Corp Reputation Rev 6, 19–35 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.crr.1540187

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.crr.1540187

Keywords

Navigation