Abstract
Raising educational levels may help to reduce inequalities between men and women in certain social and economic aspects. Using statistics for Spain, we analyse labour market behaviours such as the rates of activity and unemployment by sex according to the educational level. The results reveal that the differences between men and women decrease as the educational level increases. In particular, the modulator effect of education is very important at the higher level, where differences in labour market behaviour between men and women with an university education almost disappear, except in terms of salaries. Nevertheless, it can be seen that the current economic crisis has reduced the modulator role of education in gender differences in Spain.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
There is evidence (Acemoglu and Autor, 2010) to show that higher levels of human capital in economies cause intensive technological progress in human capital that favours increased productivity.
Becker et al. (2010) present a model that explains the increase in higher education, particularly among women, in terms of a market for college graduates in which the supply of college graduates is function of the distribution of the costs and benefits of higher education across individuals, but it appears that differences in the total costs of college for women and men, primarily because of differences in the distributions of non-cognitive skills for women and men, explain the overtaking of men by women in higher education. Similarly, Jacob (2002) finds that higher non-cognitive skills and college premiums among women account for nearly 90% of the gender gap in higher education.
In economics Okun’s law is an empirically observed relationship between an economy’s unemployment rate and its gross national product growth.
The reference categories are as follows: For educational level, primary education; for sex, male; for size of firm, from 1 to 49 workers; for the firm’s sector of activity, commerce. The years of education, necessary for calculating potential experience, are imputed as follows: No education and primary education, 4.5 years; Compulsory secondary Education, 8 years; Pre-university education, 12 years; Medium-grade vocational training, 10 years; Higher-grade vocational training, 12 years; University Diploma, 15 years; University Degree, 17 years.
References
Acemoglu, D. and Autor, D. (2010) ‘Skills, tasks and technologies: Implications for employment and earnings’, NBER Working Papers, No. 16082, Cambridge, MA.
Barro, R. and Jong-Wha, L. (2014) ‘A New Data Set of Educational Attainment in the World, 1950–2010’, Journal of Development Economics 104: 184–198.
Becker, G.S. (1962) ‘Investment in human capital: a theoretical analysis’, The Journal of Political Economy 70 (1): 9–49.
Becker, G.S., Hubbard, W.H. and Murphy, K.M. (2010) ‘Explaining the worldwide boom in higher education of women’, Journal of Human Capital 4 (3): 203–241.
Behrman, J.R. and Stacey, N. (eds.) (1997) The Social Benefits of Education, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Blau, F.D. and Kahn, L.M. (2000) ‘Gender differences in pay’, NBER Working Papers, No. 7732, Cambridge, MA.
Bover, O. and Arellano, M. (1995) ‘Female labour force participation in the 1980s: the case of Spain’, Investigaciones Económicas 19 (2): 171–194.
De la Rica, S., Dolado, J.J. and Llorens, V. (2008) ‘Ceilings or floors? Gender wage gaps by education in Spain’, Journal of Population Economics 21 (3): 751–776.
Drucker, J. and Goldstein, H. (2007) ‘Assessing the regional economic development impacts of universities: a review of current approaches’, International Regional Science Review 30 (1): 20–46.
Goldin, C.D. and Katz, L.F. (2009) The Race Between Education and Technology, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Hanusek, E., Machin, S. and Woessmann, L. (eds.) (2011) Handbook of the Economics of Education. Vol. 4. Rotterdam: Elsevier.
Hanusek, E. and Welch, F. (eds.) (2006) Handbook of the Economics of Education. Vol. 1. Rotterdam: Elsevier.
Heckman, J.J. (1979) ‘Sample selection bias as a specification error’, Econometrica 47 (1): 153–161.
Heckman, J.J., Lochner, L.J. and Todd, P.E. (2005) ‘Earnings functions, rates of return and treatment effects: the mincer equation and beyond’, IZA Discussion Papers, No. 1700, Bonn.
Jacob, B.A. (2002) ‘Where the boys aren’t: non-cognitive skills, returns to school and the gender gap in higher education’, Economics of Education Review 21 (6): 589–598.
Lochner, L.J. (2011) ‘Non-Production Benefits of Education: Crime, Health, and Good Citizenship’, NBER Working Papers, No. 16722, Cambridge, MA.
McMahon, W.W. (2009) Higher Learning, Greater Good: The Private and Social Benefits of Higher Education, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Moretti, E. (2004) ‘Estimating the social return to higher education: evidence from longitudinal and repeated cross-sectional data’, Journal of Econometrics 121 (1): 175–212.
OECD (2001) The Well-being of Nations. The Role of Human and Social Capital, Paris: OECD.
OECD (2009) Education at a Glance 2009, OECD Indicators, Paris: OECD.
OECD (2012) Gender Equality in Education, Employment and Entrepreneurship: Final Report to the MCM2012, (http://www.oecd.org/gender).
Okun, A.M. (1962) ‘Potential GNP: Its Measurement and Significance’, Proceedings of the Business and Economic Statistics Section of the American Statistical Association, Washington DC, pp. 89–104.
Pastor, J.M., Raymon, J.L., Roig, J.L. and Serrano, L. (2007) El rendimiento del capital humano en España, Valencia: Fundación Bancaja and IVIE.
Tembon, M. and Fort, L. (2008) Girls’ Education in the 21st Century: Gender Equality, Empowerment, and Economic Growth, Washington DC: World Bank.
Villar, A. (ed.) (2010) Mujeres y mercado laboral en España. Cuatro estudios sobre la discriminación salarial y la segregación laboral, Bilbao: Fundación BBVA.
Walker, I. and Zhu, Y. (2008) ‘The college wage premium and the expansion of higher education in the UK’, The Scandinavian Journal of Economics 110 (4): 695–709.
Willis, R. (1986) ‘Wage Determinants: A Survey and Reinterpretation of Human Capital Earnings Functions’, in O. Ashenfelter and R. Layard (eds.) Handbook of Labor Economics, Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 526–602.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the Editor and two anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions to improve the quality of the paper. José M. Pastor and Carlos Peraita wish to thank the Spanish Ministry of Ministry of the Economy and Competitiveness for its financial support (ECO2011-23248).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pastor, J., Peraita, C. & Soler, Á. Higher Education as Modulator of Gender Inequalities: Evidence of the Spanish Case. High Educ Policy 29, 63–88 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1057/hep.2015.1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/hep.2015.1