Skip to main content
Log in

Macroeconomic Implications of Financial Frictions in the Euro Zone

  • Symposium Introduction
  • Published:
Comparative Economic Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A macroeconomic model that explicitly incorporates financial sector influences is estimated. A survey of lending standards in the Eurozone countries is informative about aggregate economic activity. I also ask whether policy rate shocks influence lending standards, and whether these standards also have an effect on monetary policy. Briefly, the paper finds that inclusion of indicators of financial frictions in standard macromodels is essentials. Some of the results also suggest that in 2011–2012, the European Central Bank made financial conditions worse by not only raising the policy rate but by implementing a very gradual reduction in monetary conditions over the next 2 years.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 5
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Indeed, data from only a very few so-called periphery countries are available making it impractical to perform a proper test of differences between the two groups of economies.

  2. This is not to suggest that other elements are not present or potentially important. However, surveys of the kind used in the empirical work to follow are one of the few available reliable quantitative indicators of credit conditions.

  3. ‘Within our mandate, the ECB is ready to do whatever it takes to preserve the euro. And believe me, it will be enough’, Extract from remarks Draghi made in London, 26 July 2012. See http://www.ecb.europa.eu/press/key/date/2012/html/sp120726.en.html.

  4. This is the policy whereby the ECB undertakes to purchase, in secondary markets, the sovereign debt of Eurozone member states, provided they meet strict conditions. See the press release at http://www.ecb.europa.eu/press/pr/date/2012/html/pr120906_1.en.html.

  5. A recent strand of the literature takes the position that the connection between lending practices and credit conditions should be investigated with bank level data. More disaggregated data are certainly useful to understand the myriad non-price factors that can impact credit conditions as well as the effects of micro-prudential standards on bank behavior. However, central banks set monetary policy on the basis of forward-looking views of aggregate economic outcomes. Also, the global financial crisis raised the profile of macro-prudential attempts to influence credit conditions. Understanding the impact of these types of policies require a macro perspective on the state of credit conditions.

  6. In the foregoing expressions we exclude other exogenous variables. These can easily be added without jeopardizing the thrust of the discussion so far.

  7. The long-term interest rate in the euro zone economies less the Euribor (3 month euro interbank offer rate) is used to measure the term spread. The latter series are widely used short-term interest rate indicators for the euro zone.

  8. The ECB does publish commodity price series of various kinds for a shorter sample. The behavior of their series is not out of line with the WTI series.

  9. The US data referred to below is also from FRED II. See also Siklos and Lavender (2015) for additional details.

  10. As loan officers must revise their views in real-time, an assessment of credit standards relying on real-time data may well provide a different interpretation of the role of non-price elements in lending than would be obtained if revised data are used. Again, as the ECB makes available vintages of data (http://sdw.ecb.europa.eu/browse.do?node=9484612) we could investigate the real time role of the bank lending surveys. Space limitations prevent further analysis along this line. See, however, Siklos and Lavender (2015) for an example relying on the United States and Canadian data.

  11. Although, the restriction of a single principal component is imposed separate estimation which asks how many principal components exists, using maximum likelihood estimation, yields the same answer.

  12. Siklos (2014) investigates the implications of these differences in greater detail.

  13. Cyprus only serves to illustrate the potential of the BLS to reveal underlying credit conditions. As the data are only available since 2009 they were not included in the econometric estimates reported below.

  14. It is not too difficult to find examples where policy makers in Europe underestimated the internal difficulties that would eventually erupt in 2010. For example, from a speech by Jürgen Stark in 2008 celebrating the first 10 years of the euro: ‘In these demanding times, some widely-recognized core principles have helped the ECB to weather the storm. … The ECB has demonstrated its ability to act even under extraordinary circumstances – without compromising its price stability mandate. This has strengthened the ECB’s credibility.’ See http://www.ecb.europa.eu/press/key/date/2008/html/sp081114_1.en.html.

  15. There are potentially 36 such impulse response functions since the estimated VAR contains six series.

  16. In VAR analysis these confidence bands are pseudo standard errors. The ones plotted are generated from an analytical expression for an approximation of a 95% confidence interval.

  17. When the observed policy rate is replace by the shadow rate the results (not shown) as virtually identical.

  18. Recall that a rise in the financial factor is equivalent to a deterioration in financial conditions.

References

  • Baker, SR, Bloom, N and Davis, SJ . 2013: Measuring economic policy uncertainty. Working paper, Stanford University: Stanford, Calif, May.

  • Berg, J, van Rixtel, A, Ferrando, A, de Bondt, G and Scopel, S . 2005: The Bank Lending Survey for the Euro Area. Occasional paper no. 23, February, European Central Bank: ECB, Frankfurt.

  • Bernanke, B . 2012: The Economic Recovery and Economic Policy. New York Economic Club, 20 November, available at http://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/speech/bernanke20121120a.htm.

  • Bernanke, B . 2012a: Monetary Policy Since the Onset of the Crisis. Remarks delivered at the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City Symposium, Jackson Hole, Wyoming, 31 August, Federal Reserve bank of Kansas City, Kansas City.

  • Bernanke, BS and Blinder, AS . 1992: The federal funds rate and the channels of monetary transmission. American Economic Review 83.4 (1992): 901–921.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard, OJ and Fischer, S . 1989: Lectures on macroeconomics. The MIT Press: Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blinder, A and Stiglitz, J . 1983: Money, credit constraints and economic activity. American Economic Review 73 (May): 297–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carney, M . 2012: Guidance. Remarks at the CFA Society, Toronto, 11 December, available at http://www.bankofcanada.ca/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/remarks-111212.pdf.

  • De Bondt, G, Maddaloni, A, Peydro, J-L and Scopel, S . 2010: The euro area bank lending survey matters: Empirical evidence for credit and output growth. ECB working paper 1160, February, ECB, Frankfurt.

  • Draghi, M . 2014: Introductory remarks at the EP’s Economic and Monetary Affairs Committee, 22 September, European Central Bank, Frankfurt, https://www.ecb.europa.eu/press/key/date/2014/html/sp140922.en.html.

  • Forbes, K . 2012: The big ‘C’: Identifying and mitigating contagion, in the Changing Policy Landscape, Proceedings of the 2012 Jackson Hole Symposium, Kansas City: Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, pp. 23–87.

  • Fuerst, TS . 1994: The availability doctrine. Journal of Monetary Economics 34: 429–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaffee, D and Stiglitz, JE . 1990: Credit rationing. In: Friedman, BM and Hahn, FH (eds). Handbook of Monetary Economics: Volume Two. North Holland: Amsterdam pp. 838–888.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lown, C, Morgan, DP and Rohatgi, S . 2000: ‘Listening to loan officers: The impact of commercial credit standards on lending and output.’ Federal reserve bank of New York. Economic Policy Review 6 (2): 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lown, C and Morgan, DP . 2006: The credit cycle and the business cycle: New findings using the loan officer opinion survey. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 38 (6): 1575–1597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, J . 2012: Monetary Policy Decision-Making at the Bank of Canada, available at http://www.bankofcanada.ca/2012/05/speeches/monetary-policy-decision-making/, accessed 22 January 2015.

  • Owens, RE and Schreft, SL . 1991: Survey evidence of tighter credit conditions: What does it mean? Economic Review 77 (2): 29–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roosa, RV . 1951: Interest rates and the central bank. In: Money, Trade and Economic Growth: Essays in Honor of J. H. Williams. Palgrave Macmillan: New York, pp. 207–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siklos, PL . 2014: The Ill-Wind That Blows from the Eurozone: Implications for Canada’s Economy. C.D. Howe Institute Commentary No. 402, March,Toronto.

  • Siklos, PL and Lavender, B . 2015: The credit cycle and the business cycle in canada and the US: Two solitudes? Canadian Public Policy, in press.

  • Stiglitz, JE and Weiss, A . 1981: Credit rationing in markets with imperfect information. American Economic Review 71 (3): 393–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, JB . 2012: Monetary policy rules work and discretion doesn’t: A tale of two eras. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 44 (September): 1017–1032.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Comments and suggestions by conference participants and an anonymous referee are gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Siklos, P. Macroeconomic Implications of Financial Frictions in the Euro Zone. Comp Econ Stud 57, 222–242 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1057/ces.2015.16

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/ces.2015.16

Keywords

JEL Classifications

Navigation