Skip to main content
Log in

What drives the international ownership strategies of Chinese firms? The role of distance and home-country institutional factors in outward acquisitions

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Asian Business & Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We study antecedents of the international ownership strategies of Chinese multinational enterprises (MNEs). Analyzing firm-level data on 380 outward acquisitions of Chinese MNEs during 2005–2012, we find their ownership shares to be negatively related to administrative and regulative distance, but positively related to cultural and geographical distance between home and host countries. Moreover, higher ownership shares are acquired in target countries with a high density of strategic assets and high financial-market capitalization, while state-owned enterprises take lower equity positions than private companies. Overall, we find home-country institutional factors more relevant for international ownership strategies among Chinese MNEs than cross-national distance factors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Alternatively, cultural distance may also be measured based on more cultural dimensions, for example, by adding the Hofstede dimensions of long-term versus short-term orientation and indulgence versus restraint, or by relying on the GLOBE study that identified nine dimensions of national cultures (House et al, 2004). However, as these dimensions have been measured for fewer countries and do not include all countries where Chinese companies recently made acquisitions, applying them would have resulted in a substantial reduction of our survey sample. Therefore, we have used here only the four initial Hofstede dimensions for measuring cultural distance.

References

  • AeA (American Electronics Association) (2013) High technology industry, http://www.aeanet.org/Publications/Idmk_definition.asp, accessed 1 December 2012.

  • Anderson, J. (1979) A theoretical foundation for the gravity equation. American Economic Review 69 (1): 106–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, E. and Gatignon, H. (1986) Modes of foreign entry: A transaction cost analysis and propositions. Journal of International Business Studies 17 (3): 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barkema, H., Bell, J. and Pennings, J. (1996) Foreign entry, cultural barriers and learning. Strategic Management Journal 17 (2): 151–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barkema, H. and Vermeulen, F. (1997) What differences in the cultural background of partners are detrimental for international joint ventures? Journal of International Business Studies 28 (4): 845–863.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry, H., Guillén, M.F. and Zhou, N. (2010) An institutional approach to cross-national distance. Journal of International Business Studies 41 (9): 1460–1480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Björkman, I. and Lu, Y. (1999) The management of human resources in Chinese-Western joint ventures. Journal of World Business 34 (3): 306–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brouthers, K., Brouthers, L. and Werner, S. (2008) Real options, international entry mode choice, and performance. Journal of Management Studies 45 (5): 936–960.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, P. and Casson, M. (1976) The Future of the Multinational Enterprise. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, P. and Casson, M. (1981) The optimal timing of a foreign direct investment. Economic Journal 91 (361): 75–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, P., Clegg, J., Cross, A., Liu, X., Voss, H. and Zheng, P. (2007) The determinants of Chinese outward foreign direct investment. Journal of International Business Studies 38 (4): 499–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, P., Cross, A., Tan, H., Xin, L. and Voss, H. (2008) Historic and emergent trends in Chinese outward investment. Management International Review 48 (6): 715–748.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canabal, A. and White, III. G.O. (2008) Entry mode research: Past and future. International Business Review 17 (3): 267–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chakrabarti, A. and Mitchell, W. (2013) The persistent effect of geographic distance in acquisition target selection. Organization Science 24 (6): 1805–1826.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, C. and Makino, S. (2007) Legitimacy and multi-level institutional environment: Implications for foreign subsidiary ownership structure. Journal of International Business Studies 38 (4): 621–638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, S. and Rhee, J. (2011) Rapid expansion and firm performance. Journal of International Business Studies 42 (8): 979–994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Child, J. and Rodrigues, S. (2005) The internationalization of Chinese firms: A case for theoretical extension? Management and Organization Review 1 (3): 381–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CNN Money (2013) Fortune Global 500, http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/global500/index.html, accessed 31 August 2013.

  • Cui, L. and Jiang, F. (2009a) FDI entry mode choice of Chinese firms: A strategic behavior perspective. Journal of World Business 44 (4): 434–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cui, L. and Jiang, F. (2009b) Ownership decisions in Chinese outward FDI: An integrated conceptual framework and research agenda. Asian Business & Management 8 (3): 301–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cui, L., Jiang, F. and Stening, B. (2011) The entry-mode decision of Chinese outward FDI: Firm resources, industry conditions, and institutional forces. Thunderbird International Business Review 53 (4): 483–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cui, L. and Jiang, F. (2012) State ownership effect on firms’ FDI ownership decisions under institutional pressure: A study of Chinese outward-investing firms. Journal of International Business Studies 43 (3): 264–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delios, A. and Beamish, P. (1999) Ownership strategy of Japanese firms: Transactional, institutional, and experience influences. Strategic Management Journal 20 (10): 915–933.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demirbag, M., Glaister, K. and Tatoglu, E. (2007) Institutional and transaction cost influences on MNEs’ ownership strategies of their affiliates: Evidence from an emerging market. Journal of World Business 42 (4): 418–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deng, P. (2001) WFOEs: The most popular entry mode into China. Business Horizons 44 (4): 63–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deng, P. (2004) Outward investment by Chinese MNCs: Motivations and implications. Business Horizons 47 (3): 8–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deng, P. (2007) Investing for strategic resources and its rationale: The case of outward FDI from Chinese companies. Business Horizons 50 (1): 71–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P. and Powell, W. (1983) The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review 48 (2): 147–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong, L. and Glaister, K. (2007) The management of culture in Chinese international strategic alliances. Asian Business & Management 6 (4): 377–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eden, L. and Miller, S.R. (2004) Distance matters: Liability of foreignness, institutional distance and ownership strategy. In: M.A. Hitt and J.L.C. Cheng (eds.) Theories of the Multinational Enterprise: Diversity, Complexity and Relevance. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier, pp. 187–221.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gatignon, H. and Anderson, E. (1988) The multinational corporation’s degree of control over foreign subsidiaries: An empirical test of a transaction cost explanation. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 4 (2): 305–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghemawat, P. (2001) Distance still matters: The hard reality of global expansion. Harvard Business Review 19 (8): 137–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grosse, R. and Trevino, L. (1996) Foreign direct investment in the Unites States: An analysis by country of origin. Journal of International Business Studies 27 (1): 139–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guler, I. and Guillén, M. (2010) Institutions and the internationalization of US venture capital firms. Journal of International Business Studies 41 (2): 185–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, A., Govindarajan, V. and Wang, H. (2008) The Quest for Global Dominance: Transforming Global Presence into Global Competitive Advantage. San Francisco, CA: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harzing, A-W. (2004) The role of culture in entry-mode studies: From neglect to myopia? In: J.L.C. Cheng and M.A. Hitt (eds.) Managing Multinationals in a Knowledge Economy: Economics, Culture and Human Resources. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier, pp. 75–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henisz, W. (2000) The institutional environment for multinational investment. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 16 (2): 334–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hennart, J. (1991) The transaction costs theory of joint ventures: An empirical study of Japanese subsidiaries in the United States. Management Science 17 (4): 483–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G.J. and Minkov, M. (2010) Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind, 3rd edn. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • House, R.J., Hanges, P.J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P.W. and Gupta, V. (2004) Culture, Leadership and Organizations: The GLOBE Study of 62 Societies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hymer, S. (1960) The International Operations of National Firms: A Study of Direct Foreign Investment. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ifo Institute (2012) CESifo World Economic Survey, Vol. 11, 3 August Munich, Germany: Ifo Institute.

  • Johanson, J. and Vahlne, J. (1977) The internationalization process of the firm: A model of knowledge development and increasing foreign-market commitments. Journal of International Business Studies 8 (1): 23–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kogut, B. and Singh, H. (1988) The effect of national culture on the choice of entry mode. Journal of International Business Studies 19 (3): 411–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kostova, T. (1999) Transnational transfer of strategic organizational practices: A contextual perspective. Academy of Management Review 24 (2): 308–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kostova, T. and Zaheer, S. (1999) Organizational legitimacy under conditions of complexity: The case of the multinational enterprise. Academy of Management Review 24 (1): 64–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, J. and Li, Y. (2010) Flexibility versus commitment: MNEs’ ownership strategy in China. Journal of International Business Studies 41 (9): 1550–1571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubatkin, M., Calori, R., Very, P. and Veriga, J. (1998) Managing mergers across borders: A two-nation exploration of a nationally bound administrative heritage. Organizational Science 9 (6): 670–684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, Y. and Tung, R. (2007) International expansion of emerging market enterprises: A springboard perspective. Journal of International Business Studies 38 (4): 481–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, Y., Xue, Q. and Han, B. (2010) How emerging-market governments promote outward FDI: Experience from China. Journal of World Business 45 (1): 68–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March, J. (1981) Decisions in organizations and theories of choice. In: A. Van de Ven and W. Joyce (eds.) Perspectives on Organizational Design and Behavior. New York: Wiley, pp. 205–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathews, J.A. (2006) Dragon multinationals: New players in 21st-century globalization. Asia Pacific Journal of Management 23 (1): 5–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MOFCOM (Ministry of Commerce People’s Republic of China) (2012) Statistical Bulletin of China’s Outward Foreign Direct Investment. Beijing, China: Ministry of Commerce and National Bureau of Statistics.

  • Morck, R., Yeung, B. and Zhao, M. (2008) Perspectives on China’s outward foreign direct investment. Journal of International Business Studies 39 (3): 337–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • North, D. (1990) Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ogasavara, M. and Hoshino, Y. (2008) The effect of entry strategy and inter-firm trust on the survival of Japanese manufacturing subsidiaries in Brazil. Asian Business & Management 7 (3): 353–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pak, Y. and Park, Y. (2004) Global ownership strategy of Japanese multinational enterprises: A test of internalization theory. Management International Review 44 (1): 3–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng, M. (2012) The global strategy of emerging multinationals from China. Global Strategy Journal 2 (2): 97–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng, M., Tan, J. and Tong, T. (2004) Ownership types and strategic groups in an emerging economy. Journal of Management Studies 41 (7): 1105–1129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng, M., Wang, D. and Jiang, Y. (2008) An institution-based view of international business strategy: A focus on emerging economies. Journal of International Business Studies 39 (5): 920–936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puck, J., Holtbruegge, D. and Mohr, A. (2009) Beyond entry mode choices: Explaining the conversion of joint ventures into wholly-owned subsidiaries in the People’s Republic of China. Journal of International Business Studies 40 (3): 388–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rabbiosi, L., Elia, S. and Bertoni, F. (2012) Acquisitions by EMNCs in developed markets. Management International Review 52 (2): 193–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ragozzino, R. (2009) The effects of geographic distance on the foreign acquisition activity of US firms. Management International Review 49 (4): 509–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ragozzino, R. and Reuer, J. (2011) Geographic distance and corporate acquisitions: Signals from IPO firms. Strategic Management Journal 32 (8): 876–894.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rui, H. and Yip, G. (2008) Foreign acquisition by Chinese firms: A strategic-intent perspective. Journal of World Business 43 (2): 213–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schüler-Zhou, Y. and Schüler, M. (2013) An empirical study of Chinese subsidiaries’ decision-making autonomy in Germany. Asian Business & Management 12 (3): 321–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W. (1995) Institutions and Organizations. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan, H. and Ai, Q. (2010) China’s outward mergers and acquisitions in the 21st century: Motivations, progress and the role of the Chinese government. Advances in Mergers and Acquisitions 9: 25–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCTAD (UN Conference on Trade and Development) (2013) UNCTAD statistics, inward and outward foreign direct investment stock, annual, 1980–2012, http://unctadstat.unctad.org/, accessed 6 November 2013.

  • Wan, W. and Hoskisson, R. (2003) Home country environments, corporate diversification strategies, and firm performance. Academy of Management Journal 46 (1): 27–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Witt, M. and Lewin, Y. (2007) Outward foreign direct investment as escape response to home-country institutional constraints. Journal of International Business Studies 38 (4): 579–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wooldridge, J. (2002) Econometric Analysis of Cross-Section and Panel Data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2013) World DataBank, http://databank.worldbank.org/data/home.aspx, accessed 31 August 2013.

  • World Economic Forum (2011) The Global Competitiveness Report 2011–1012. Geneva, Switzerland: World Economic Forum.

  • Xu, D. and Shenkar, O. (2002) Institutional distance and the multinational enterprise. Academy of Management Review 27 (3): 608–618.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, D., Pan, Y. and Beamish, P. (2004) The effect of regulative and normative distances on MNE ownership and expatriate strategies. Management International Review 44 (3): 285–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamakawa, Y., Peng, M. and Deeds, D. (2008) What drives new ventures to internationalize from emerging to developed economies? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 32 (1): 59–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yiu, D. and Makino, S. (2002) The choice between joint venture and wholly-owned subsidiary: An institutional perspective. Organization Science 13 (6): 667–683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yiu, D., Ng, F.W. and Ma, X. (2013) Business-group attributes and internationalization strategy in China. Asian Business & Management 12 (1): 14–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaheer, S. (1995) Overcoming the liability of foreignness. Academy of Management Journal 38 (2): 341–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhan, J. (1995) Transnationalization and outward investment: The case of Chinese firms. Transnational Corporation 4 (3): 61–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, X. and Daly, K. (2011) The determinants of China’s outward foreign direct investment. Emerging Markets Review 12 (4): 389–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, H., Luo, Y. and Suh, T. (2004) Transaction cost determinants and ownership-based entry mode choice: A meta-analytical review. Journal of International Business Studies 35 (6): 524–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank participants of the EAMSA 2012 and AIB 2013 conferences and two anonymous reviewers for helpful comments on earlier versions of this article. The review process for this article was entirely handled by Guest Editor Hendrik Meyer-Ohle. This research was supported by a KUBS faculty research grant.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Hemmert.

Appendices

Appendix A

Table A1

Table A1 Summary of variables

Appendix B

Table B1

Table B1 Multiple-item measures of key constructs

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, Y., Hemmert, M. & Kim, J. What drives the international ownership strategies of Chinese firms? The role of distance and home-country institutional factors in outward acquisitions. Asian Bus Manage 13, 197–225 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1057/abm.2014.5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/abm.2014.5

Keywords

Navigation