Skip to main content

Abstract

In Chapter 1, I discussed how the art of joking became more closely associated with the personality and life of the comic from around the time of the rise of the ‘sick comics’ in America, and how that ethos and approach infiltrated comedy styles in Britain and Ireland. There are many ways in which a comedian will connect with his or her audience and I will return to the subject in more detail a little later in this study. From more traditional (at times) and contemporary standpoints; the means by which a comedian will attempt to connect with an audience is tied intimately to ideas of self-expression. That is, the comedian is communicating to the audience something drawn from the experience of his or her own life. The comedian may well frame the performance of him or herself as:

The real deal: this is me exposing the humorous side of my life... [so much so] that some comedy audiences refuse to believe the material is prepared at all, expecting comedians to produce a new set of jokes every night, as though they were evangelists speaking in tongues.1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Jimmy Carr and Lucy Greeves, The Naked Jape: Uncovering The Hidden World of Jokes (London: Penguin), 2006), p. 113.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mort Sahl, quoted in Oliver Double, Getting the Joke: The Inner Workings of Stand-Up Comedy (UK: Methuen Drama, 2005), p. 70.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Frank Skinner, Frank Skinner (London: Century), 2001), p. 80.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Paul Ricoeur, ‘Life In Quest Of Narrative’, in On Paul Ricoeur: Narrative and Interpretation, ed. by David Wood (London: Routledge), 1991), p. 20

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ciarán Benson, The Cultural Psychology of Self: Place, Morality and Art in Human Worlds (London: Routledge), 2001), p. 45.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Elinor Ochs and Lisa Capps, ‘Narrating the Self’, Annual Review of Anthropology, 25 (1996), 19–43 (p. 21).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Erving Goffman, cited in Eelka Lampe, ‘Rachel Rosenthal Creating Her Selves’, in Acting (Re)Considered: A Theoretical and Practical Guide, 2nd edn, ed. by Phillip B. Zarrilli (Oxon: Routledge), 2002), pp. 291–304 (p. 299).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Henry Bial, ‘What is Performance’? in The Performance Studies Reader: Second Edition, ed. by Henry Bial (Oxon: Routledge), 2007), pp. 59–60 (p. 59).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Richard Schechner, Performance Theory (Oxon: Routledge Classics), 2003), p. 186.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Erving Goffman quoted in Richard Schechner, Between Theatre & Anthropology (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press), 1985), p. 311.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Phil Berger, The Last Laugh: The World of Stand-up Comics (New York: Cooper Square Press, 2000), p. 279.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Alison Oddey, Performing Women (London: Macmillan Press), 1999), p. 21.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Neal R. Norrick, ‘On the Conversational Performance of Narrative Jokes: Toward an Account of Timing’, Humor, 3:14 (2001), 255–73 (p. 256).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rebecca Emlinger Roberts, ‘Standup Comedy and the Prerogative of Art’, The Massachusetts Review 41:2 (2000), 151–60 (p. 157).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Tony Allen, Attitude: Wanna Make Something of It? The Secret of Stand-Up Comedy (Glastonbury: Gothic Image Publications), 2002), p. 28.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Michel Foucault and Jay Miskowiec, ‘Of Other Spaces’, Diacritics, 16:1 (1986), 22–7 (p. 23).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. The study of play occupies a vast territory. Erving Goffman’s concept of framing, through which to understand notions of play behaviour, is widely recognised. Richard Schechner’s discussions on playing are far-reaching, Schechner describes the ‘play net’, to explicate his ideas on playing in culture and performance. Models and explorations of what constitutes playing are also prevalent in the diverse fields of anthropology, psychology, and philosophy. This is not all that play is; rather this constitutes a sample of the depth of knowledge that exists around ideas of playing in a culture. For an introduction to ideas of play, see Performance Analysis: An Introductory Coursebook, ed. by Colin Counsell and Laurie Wolf (Oxon: Routledge, 2001)

    Google Scholar 

  18. See also Richard Schechner, Performance Studies: An Introduction (London: Routledge), 2002)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Richard Schechner, Performance Theory (Oxon: Routledge), 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Johan Huizinga, Homo Ludens: A Study of the Play Element in Culture (London: Routledge), 1980) pp. 13–20.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sophie Quirk ‘Who’s In Charge?: Negotiation, Manipulation and Comic Licence in the Work of Mark Thomas’, Comedy Studies, 1:1 (2010), 113–24 (p. 116).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Peter L. Berger, Redeeming Laughter: The Comic Dimension of Human Experience (Berlin and New York: De Gruyter, 1997), pp. 12–14; and Sophie Quirk, ‘Who’s In Charge?’, p. 116.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  23. John Morreall in Sophie Quirk, ‘Who’s In Charge?’, p. 116. For further discussion, see Simon Critchley, On Humour: Thinking in Action (Oxon: Routledge), 2002), pp. 87–8

    Google Scholar 

  24. Mary Douglas, ‘Jokes’, in Implicit Meanings (London: Routledge), 1999), pp. 150–1.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Lawrence E. Mintz, ‘Standup Comedy as Social and Cultural Mediation’, American Quarterly, 37 (1985), 71–80 (p. 75).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. For a more comprehensive discussion on the trickster, see Carl Jung, The Archetypes and the Collective Unconscious, trans. by R.F.C. Hull, 2nd edn (London: Routledge), 2006), pp. 257–60.

    Google Scholar 

  27. See also Jimmy Carr and Lucy Greeves, The Naked Jape: Uncovering The Hidden World of Jokes (London: Penguin), 2006), pp. 41–2.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Michael Billig, Laughter and Ridicule: Towards a Social Critique of Humour (London: Sage Publications), 2005), p. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Andrew Stott, Comedy: The New Critical Idiom (Oxon: Routledge), 2005), p. 60.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Richard Schechner, ‘The End of Humanism’, PAJ, 4:1/2 (1979), 9–22 (pp. 12–13).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Philip Auslander, ‘Postmodernism and Performance’, in The Cambridge Companion to Postmodernism, ed. by Stephen Connor (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 2004), pp. 97–113 (p.107).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2015 Susanne Colleary

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Colleary, S. (2015). The Comic ‘i’. In: Performance and Identity in Irish Stand-Up Comedy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137343901_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics