Abstract
The purpose of this chapter is to draw attention to a weakness, so far unnoticed, of the neoclassical argument in support of Say’s Law—that is, of the thesis that investment is determined by savings,1 and that therefore aggregate demand poses no obstacle to selling at cost- covering prices the aggregate supply of goods whatever the forces determining the latter. The neoclassical argument, relying upon an assumed negative interest elasticity of investment derived from the demand-for-capital function, neglects the problems with the marginalist or neoclassical conception of capital: as pointed out by the late Pierangelo Garegnani (1983, 1990), the discovery of reverse capital deepening undermines the foundations of Say’s Law, because it undermines the belief in a negative interest elasticity of the demand for (value) capital, but then also the belief in a negative interest elasticity of aggregate investment; Garegnani concluded that the ‘neoclassical synthesis’ criticism of Keynes could not be accepted, and that aggregate demand had to be considered the determinant of employment and growth not only in the short period but also in the long run. In Petri (2004, ch. 7) I reinforced Garegnani’s contention by showing that the attempts, after Keynes, to derive a negative interest elasticity of investment without relying on the traditional neoclassical conception of capital are all indefensible.2
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Alchian, A. A. (1955) ‘The Rate of Interest, Fisher’s Rate of Return over Costs and Keynes’s Internal Rate of Return’, American Economic Review, 45 (December): 938–43.
Dornbusch, R. and Fischer, S. (1984) Macroeconomics, 3rd edn (New York: McGraw-Hill).
Garegnani, P. (1983) ‘Notes on Consumption, Investment and Effective Demand’, in J. Eatwell and M. Milgate (eds), Keynes’s Economics and the Theory of Value and Distribution (New York: Oxford University Press)
Garegnani, P. (1990) ‘Quantity of Capital’, in J. Eatwell, M. Milgate and P. Newman (eds), The New Palgrave: Capital Theory (London: Macmillan).
Hahn, F. H. (1981) ‘Review of M. Beenstock “A neoclassical analysis of macroeconomic policy” (Cambridge University Press, 1980)’, Economic Journal, (December): 1036–9.
Hayek, F. A. (1932) ‘Money and capital: a reply’, Economic Journal, 42: 237–49.
Hicks, J. R. (1932) The Theory of Wages (London: Macmillan).
Jorgenson, D. V. (1963), ‘Capital theory and investment behavior’, American Economic Review, 53(2), (May): 247–59.
Katzner, D. W. (2006) An Introduction to the Economic Theory of Market Behavior. Microeconomics from a Walrasian Perspective (Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar).
Petri, E (1991) ‘Hicks’s recantation of the temporary equilibrium method’, Review of Political Economy, 3(3): 268–88.
Petri, F. (1999) ‘Professor Hahn on the neo-Ricardian criticism of neoclassical economics’, in G. Mongiovi and F. Petri (eds), Value, Distribution and Capital: Essays in Honour of Pierangelo Garegnani (London: Routledge): pp. 19–68.
Petri, F. (2003) ‘Should the Theory of Endogenous Growth be based on Say’s Law and the Full Employment of Resources?’, in N. Salvadori (ed.), The Theory of Economic Growth: A ‘Classical’ Perspective (Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar): pp. 139–60.
Petri, F. (2004) General Equilibrium, Capital and Macroeconomics (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar).
Petri, F. (2011a) ‘On the Likelihood and Relevance of Reswitching and Reverse Capital Deepening’, in N. Salvadori and C. Gehrke (eds), Keynes, Sraffa and the Criticism of Neoclassical Theory. Essays in Honour of Heinz Kurz (Abingdon and New York: Routledge): pp. 380–418.
Petri, F. (2011b) ‘On the Recent Debate on Capital Theory and General Equilibrium’, in V. Caspari (ed.), The Evolution of Economic Theory. Essays in Honour of Bertram Schefold (Abingdon and New York: Routledge), ch. 4: pp. 55–99.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2013 contributors
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Petri, F. (2013). The Inevitable Dependence of Investment on Expected Demand: Implications for Neoclassical Macroeconomics. In: Levrero, E.S., Palumbo, A., Stirati, A. (eds) Sraffa and the Reconstruction of Economic Theory: Volume Two. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137319166_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137319166_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-34703-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-31916-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)