Abstract
Since Marcel Proust first noted that the remembrance of things past is not necessarily the remembrance of things as they were, the question of how memories form has produced multiple answers. So too with the positioning of the platforms by which memory takes shape. Though the recognition of collective memory clearly implicates some notion of institutional presence, which institutions are central has never been clear. And though one of the most productive take-away points of collective memory studies is that institutions with no direct connection to memory in their remit are engaging in memory work all the time, journalism is nowhere in these discussions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Giddens, Anthony (1981) A Contemporary Critique of Historical Materialism: Power, Property and the State. London: Macmillan.
Harvey, David (1990) The Condition of Postmodernity. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
Kuhn, Thomas (1964) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Rushkoff, Douglas (2013) Present Shock: When Everything Happens Now. New York: Penguin Group.
Virilio, Paul (2000) Polar Inertia, trans. P. Camiller. London: Sage.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2014 Barbie Zelizer and Keren Tenenboim-Weinblatt
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Zelizer, B., Tenenboim-Weinblatt, K. (2014). Journalism’s Memory Work. In: Zelizer, B., Tenenboim-Weinblatt, K. (eds) Journalism and Memory. Palgrave Macmillan Memory Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137263940_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137263940_1
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-26393-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-26394-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave Media & Culture CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)