Skip to main content

The Reality of Fictive Cinematic Characters

  • Chapter
Shakespeare and Character

Part of the book series: Palgrave Shakespeare Studies ((PASHST))

Abstract

This paper is about the metaphysics of fiction. It outlines a case for the existence of “fictional characters,” more precisely, fictive characters encountered in narrative fictions. In doing so, it tries to secure a niche for such entities within the familiar world of material objects, artefacts, and properties. Thus I advocate realism about fictive characters. “Realism” here denotes an ontological thesis. To be a realist about something is to believe it exists and is what it is independently of how one takes it to be. Realism, then, is associated with mind-independence. Macbeth and company may strike us as poor candidates for realism. But let’s not be hasty.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. John Heil’s From an Ontological Point of View (Oxford: Clarendon, 2003) develops this idea at length.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Andrew Kania, “The Illusion of Realism in Film,” British Journal of Aesthetics 42 (2002): 243–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gregory Currie, Image and Mind: Film, Philosophy, and Cognitive Science (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995), 30–42.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. David Park, The Fire Within the Eye: An Historical Essay on the Nature and Meaning of Light (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1997) introduces readers to the nature and science of light.

    Google Scholar 

  5. C. B. Martin, “On the Need For Properties: The Road to Pythagoreanism and Back,” Synthese 112 (1997); 193–231, at 205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Proponents of this version of antirealism include Kendall Walton, Mimesis As Make-Believe: On the Foundations of the Representational Arts (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1990)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gregory Currie, The Nature of Fiction (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Amie Thomasson, Fiction and Metaphysics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Peter Lamarque, defending a version of artifactualism in “How To Create A Fictional Character,” in The Creation of Art: New Essays in Philosophical Aesthetics, eds Berys Gaut and Paisley Livingston (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003), 33–52, contends that character creation necessitates creation of a narrative.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Among the vast philosophical literature on concepts, three recent studies have been especially helpful to me: Jesse Prinz, Furnishing the Mind: Concepts and Their Perceptual Basis (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2002)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ruth Garret Millikan, On Clear and Confused Ideas: An Essay About Substance Concepts (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Wayne Davis, Meaning, Expression, and Thought (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. Paisley Livingston, Art and Intention: A Philosophical Study (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005), 7–8.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Livingston’s understanding of intentions draws principally upon that of action theorist Alfred Mele, Springs of Action (New York: Oxford University Press, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  15. For background on Throne of Blood’s literary and theatrical sources, see Keiko McDonald, “Noh intofilm: Kurosawa’s Throne of Blood,” Journal of Film and Video 39 (1987): 36–41

    Google Scholar 

  16. Joan Mellen, “On Kurosawa’s Throne of Blood,” The Literary Review 22 (1979): 461–71

    Google Scholar 

  17. Donald Richie, The Films of Akira Kurosawa (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Creations of the Mind, eds Stephen Laurence and Eric Margolis (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2007) is an excellent introduction to thought about the nature and definition of artifacts.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kendall Walton, Mimesis as Make-Believe; Jerrold Levinson, “Emotion in Response to Art,” in Contemplating Art: Essays in Aesthetics, (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006), 38–55.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Noël Carroll, The Philosophy of Horror or Paradoxes of the Heart (London: Routledge, 1990), 60–88

    Google Scholar 

  21. Berys Gaut, Art, Emotion and Ethics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007), 203–26.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2009 Trevor Ponech

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ponech, T. (2009). The Reality of Fictive Cinematic Characters. In: Yachnin, P., Slights, J. (eds) Shakespeare and Character. Palgrave Shakespeare Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230584150_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics