Skip to main content

‘I Just Need to Ask Somebody Some Questions’: Sensitivities in Domestic Dispute Calls

  • Chapter
Language in the Legal Process

Abstract

Citizen calls to the police to report disputes they are having with close others often involve communicative trouble: shouting, convoluted accounts, and disparaging remarks are frequent. Simply put, calls about domestic disputes are common sites for interactional trouble between citizens and police call-takers. One reason for this, identified three decades ago (Reiss, 1971), is that citizens lack an adequate understanding of the distinction between criminal, civil and private matters. Citizens expect the police to intervene and do whatever a caller regards as morally right. From the police point of view, however, that is not their job. Only certain kinds of complaints are legitimately within their jurisdiction.

A call comes in on 911. A man is hollering saying that a woman needs to be arrested. He states that he was arrested last time and it’s her turn. She is downstairs and has ‘my baby’. The caller notes that there is a restraining order on him but she has come to his place of work. The man is mad. The call-taker says that he can explain it to the officer. The caller seems to expect that since he requested that she be arrested that she will be. The call-taker informs him that the officer will decide what to do when he arrives. The man ends the conversation after this exchange by saying sarcastically, ‘I’ll call you back to chat.’

A man begins a call to the regular police line by asking, ‘Who would I need to speak to? I’m worried about my wife. She needs help for drugs.’ The caller mentions that ‘there’s white stuff in her jewellery box’. He mentions that he tasted it. He goes on to say that she is having an affair, and that the man she is having the affair with has been in their home. The caller notes that they have two kids. He states that at first he didn’t do anything about ‘it’. He goes on to say that a week ago, ‘he lost it’. His wife was attacking him and he hit her back. Because of this, she got a warrant for him. The call-taker keeps asking questions that suggest that the caller has a counselling need; she asks if he wants a referral number to call. The man persists in telling his story. He resists the call-taker’s attempt to frame his problem as a request for information about what telephone number to call.1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • APCO (1992) Basic Telecommunicator Training Course. South Daytona, FL: APCO Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, J. M. and Heritage, J. (eds) (1984) Structure of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergmann, J. R. (1998) ‘Introduction: Morality in Discourse’, Research on Language and Social Interaction, vol. 31, pp. 279–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, P. and Levinson, S. C. (1987) Universals in Language. Usage: Politeness Phenomena. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig, R. T. (1989) ‘Communication as a Practical Discipline’, in B. Dervin, L. Grossberg, B. J. O’Keefe and E. Wartella (eds), Rethinking Communication: Vol. 1. Paradigm issues). Newbury Park, CA: Sage, pp. 97–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig, R. T. (1995) ‘Applied Communication Research in a Practical Discipline’, in K. Cissna (ed.), Applied Communication in the Twentieth Century. Norwood, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 147–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig, R. T. (1996) ‘Practical-Theoretical Argumentation’, Argumentation, vol. 10, pp. 461–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craig, R. T. and Tracy, K. (1995). ‘Grounded Practical Theory: The Case of Intellectual Discussion’, Communication Theory, vol. 5, pp. 248–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1989) John Dewey: The Later Works 1925–1953, Volume 8: 1933 (J. A. Boydston, ed.), Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drew, P. and Heritage, J. (eds) (1992), Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, D. and Potter, J. (1992) Discursive Psychology. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, N. and Wodak, R. (1997) ‘Critical Discourse Analysis’, in T. A. van Dijk (ed.), Discourse as Social Interaction. London: Sage, pp. 258–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1955) ‘On Facework: An Analysis of Ritual Elements in Social Interaction’, Psychiatry, vol. 18, pp. 213–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manning, P. K. (1988) Symbolic Communication: Signifying Calls and the Police Response. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiss, Jr, A. J. (1971) The Police and the Public. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharrock, W. W. and Turner, R. (1978) ‘On a Conversational Environment for Equivocality’, in J. Schenkein (ed.), Studies in the Organization of Conversational Interaction. NY: Academic Press, pp. 173–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shuler, S. (2001) ‘Talking Community at 911: The Centrality of Communication in Coping with Emotional Labor’, in G. J. Shephered and E. W. Rothenbuhler (eds), Communication and Community, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 53–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tracy, K. (1995) ‘Action-Implicative Discourse Analysis’, Journal of Language and Social Psychology, vol. 14, pp. 195–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tracy, K. (1997a) Colloquium: Dilemmas of Academic Discourse. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tracy, K. (1997b) ‘Interactional Trouble in Emergency Service Requests: A Problem of Frames’, Research on Language and Social Interaction, vol. 30, pp. 315–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tracy, K. (2001) ‘Discourse Analysis in Communication’, in D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen and H. Hamilton (eds), Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Oxford, UK: Blackwell, pp. 725–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tracy, K. and Anderson, D. L. (1999) ‘Relational Positioning Strategies in Calls to the Police: A Dilemma’, Discourse Studies, vol. 1, pp. 201–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tracy, K. and Tracy, S. J. (1998) ‘Rudeness at 911: Reconceptualizing Face and Face-Attack’, Human Communication Research, vol. 25, pp. 225–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tracy, S. J. and Tracy, K. (1998) ‘Emotion Labor at 911: A Case Study and Theoretical Critique’, Journal of Applied Communication, vol. 26, pp. 390–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whalen, M. R. and Zimmerman, D. H. (1987) ‘Sequential and Institutional Contexts in Calls for Help’, Social Psychology Quarterly, vol. 50, pp. 172–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whalen, M. R. and Zimmerman, D. H. (1990) ‘Describing Trouble: Practical Epistemology in Citizen Calls to the Police’, Language in Society, vol. 19, pp. 465–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, D. H. (1984) ‘Talk and its Occasion: The Case of Calling the Police’, in D. Schiffrin (ed.), Meaning, Form, and Use in Context. Georgetown: Georgetown University Press, pp. 210–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, D. H. (1992) ‘Achieving Context: Openings in Emergency Calls’, in G. Watson and R. M. Seiler (eds), Text in Context: Contributions to Ethnomethodology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, pp. 35–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, D. H. (1992b) ‘The Interactional Organization of Calls for Emergency Assistance’, in P. Drew and J. Heritage (eds), Talk at Work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 418–69.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2002 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tracy, K., Agne, R.R. (2002). ‘I Just Need to Ask Somebody Some Questions’: Sensitivities in Domestic Dispute Calls. In: Cotterill, J. (eds) Language in the Legal Process. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230522770_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics