Skip to main content

Whose Voice Is It? Invented and Concealed Dialogue in Written Records of Verbal Evidence Produced by the Police

  • Chapter
Book cover Language in the Legal Process

Abstract

One major type of evidence presented by the police at trial is their record of what the accused said. This evidence comes in two forms — records of interviews with suspects and records of statements made by suspects. Since the Police and Criminal Evidence Act (PACE, 1984) which was introduced following a spate of claims that those accused of crimes were frequently ‘verballed’ (that is, verbal evidence was fabricated by police officers), the police in England have been required, whenever possible, to make a contemporaneous audio or video recording of verbal evidence. However, the three cases that I will discuss in this chapter predate PACE and come from a time when it was customary to record what was said in interviews laboriously in longhand. I was commissioned as an expert in all three cases when they were referred, successfully, to the Court of Appeal in the late 1990s.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Austin, J. L. (1962) How to do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University, Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackwell, S. (1996) ‘Corrective Measures: Some Aspects of Transcription in the British Legal System’, in H. Kniffka, S. Blackwell and R. M. Coulthard (eds), Recent Developments in Forensic Linguistics. Frankfurt, Peter Lang, pp. 255–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coulthard, R. M. (1993) ‘On Beginning the Study of Forensic Texts: Corpus, Concordance, Collocation’, in M. Hoey (ed.), Data, Description, Discourse. London: HarperCollins, pp. 86–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coulthard, R. M. (1996) ‘The Official Version: Audience Manipulation in Police Reports of Interviews with Suspects’, in C. R. Caldas-Coulthard and R. M. Coulthard (eds), Texts and Practices: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge, pp. 164–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, T. R. (1994) ‘ESDA and the Analysis of Contested Contemporaneous Notes of Police Interviews’, Forensic Linguistics, vol. 1 (1), pp. 71–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eades, D. (1996) ‘Verbatim Courtroom Transcripts and Discourse Analysis’, in H. Kniffka, S. Blackwell and R. M. Coulthard (eds), Recent Developments in Forensic Linguistics. Frankfurt, Peter Lang, pp. 241–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagano, A. (1994) ‘Negatives in Written Text’, in R. M. Coulthard (ed.), Advances in Written Text Analysis. London: Routledge, pp. 250–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trow, M. J. (1992) ‘Let him have it Chris’. London: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2002 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Coulthard, M. (2002). Whose Voice Is It? Invented and Concealed Dialogue in Written Records of Verbal Evidence Produced by the Police. In: Cotterill, J. (eds) Language in the Legal Process. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230522770_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics