Abstract
Two months after the general election of June 1970, a Conservative candidate wrote of ‘a mood of euphoria in Tory ranks’.1 His own constituency had rejected him, but his party had returned to power after six years in opposition. Labour’s margin of victory in the 1964 general election had been little more than 200,000 votes, and only 13 seats. But that contest had brought to an end 13 unbroken years of Conservative government, and was preceded by a rapid succession of serious blows to party morale, notably the failure to negotiate Britain’s entry into the EEC, the Profumo Affair, and Harold Macmillan’s resignation in October 1963. At best, the Conservatives seemed to have run out of steam in 1964; unkinder critics could portray them as complacent custodians of a decadent social and economic system. They were beaten more soundly in a second general election, in 1966. To bounce back by 1970 - taking less time to recover office than Churchill had required after 1945 - was an impressive feat. In the process the Party carried through a crucial reform of its procedures, and conducted a far-reaching policy review. By 1970 the experienced Conservative front-bench team seemed well equipped to resume their party’s ‘natural’ governing role, after Harold Wilson’s regrettable usurpation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
E. Wright, ‘The future of the Conservative Party’, Political Quarterly, 41 (1970), 387.
R. Rhodes James, Ambitions and Realities: British Politics 1964–70 (London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1972), 235.
See M. Garnett and I. Aitken, Splendid! Splendid! The Authorised Biography of Willie Whitelaw (London: Jonathan Cape, 2002), 85.
James Margach in Sunday Times, 17 May 1970, quoted in T.F Lindsay and M. Harrington, The Conservative Party 1918–1970 (London: Macmillan, 1974), 259.
The text of the speech is reproduced in H. Berkeley, The Odyssey of Enoch: A Political Memoir (London: Hamish Hamilton, 1977), 129–37.
For contrasting views see Berkeley, Odyssey of Enoch, and S. Heffer, Like the Roman: The Life of Enoch Powell (London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1998).
For a recent analysis of the 1963 leadership saga, see I. Gilmour and M. Garnett, Whatever Happened to the Tories? The Conservatives since 1945 (London: Fourth Estate, 1997), 186–203. For Home’s social views, see his private ‘confession’ to Sir Michael Fraser, 19 December 1963, National Archives, Public Record Office (PRO), PREM 11/5006.
The 1964 rules are reprinted in N. Fisher, The Tory Leaders (London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1977), 194–7.
A. Roth, Heath and the Heathmen (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1972), 186.
J. Ramsden, The Winds of Change: Macmillan to Heath, 1957–1975 (Harlow: Longman, 1996), 268–9.
See Heath’s curt criticism in E. Heath, The Course of My Life: My Autobiography (London: Hodder and Stoughton, 1998), 290.
J. Ramsden, The Making of Conservative Party Policy: The Conservative Research Department since 1929 (Harlow: Longman, 1980), 237; interview with James Douglas, July 2004.
D. Butler and M. Pinto-Duschinsky, The British General Election of 1970 (London: Macmillan, 1971), 102, 283, 288–9.
Lord Coleraine, For Conservatives Only (London: Tom Stacey, 1970), 20.
For a thought-provoking recent contribution, see E.H.H Green, Ideologies of Conservatism: Conservative Political Ideas in the Twentieth Century (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002).
D. Butler and A. King, The British General Election of 1966 (London: Macmillan, 1966), 124.
S. Brittan, Left or Right: The Bogus Dilemma (London: Seeker and Warburg, 1968).
See J. Barr, The Bow Group: A History (London: Politico’s, 2001), 88–115; Joseph quoted in minutes of a seminar held at Sundridge Park, September 1969, Bodleian Library, Carr MSS, uncatalogued.
Figures from Gallup Polls, cited in L. Johnman, ‘The Conservative Party in opposition 1964–70’, in R. Coopey, S. Fielding and N. Tiratsoo (eds), The Wilson Governments (London: Pinter Publishers, 1993), 192.
S. Brittan, ‘Some thoughts on the Conservative opposition’, Political Quarterly, 39 (1968), 145–55. As a participant in the policy-making process, Brittan was well placed to comment; but his contribution was really yet another appeal for the Party to say something different, rather than saying the same thing differently.
W. Deedes, ‘Conflicts within the Conservative Party’, Political Quarterly, 44 (1973), 393.
A. Maude, The Common Problem: A Policy for the Future (London: Constable, 1969).
See A. Denham and M. Garnett, Keith Joseph: A Life (Teddington: Acumen, 2001), 151–8.
Carr to Maudling, 24 November 1969, Carr MSS. For an excellent discussion of the policy preparations on industrial relations, see R. Taylor, ‘The Heath government and industrial relations: myth and reality’, in S. Ball and A. Seldon (eds), The Heath Government 1970–74: A Reappraisal (Harlow: Longman, 1996), 164–9.
J. Prior, A Balance of Power (London: Hamish Hamilton, 1986), 48–9; Gilmour and Garnett, Whatever Happened to the Tories?, 240.
Steering Committee minutes, 3 April 1968, CPA, SC/68/5; R. Shepherd, Iain Macleod (London: Hutchinson, 1994), 519.
N. Ridley, My Style of Government: The Thatcher Years (London: Hutchinson, 1991), 4.
T. Benn, Office without Power: Diaries 1968–72 (London: Arrow edition, 1988), 349.
A. Gamble, The Conservative Nation (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1974), 102.
H. Berkeley, Crossing the Floor (London: Allen and Unwin, 1972), 102.
M. Thatcher, The Path to Power (London: HarperCollins, 1995), 160.
Quoted in J. Campbell, Edward Heath: A Life (London: Jonathan Cape, 1993), 265.
Lord Young, The Enterprise Years: A Businessman in the Cabinet (London: Headline, 1990), 15.
A. Clark, The Tories: Conservatives and the Nation State 1922–1997 (London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1998), 412; Denham and Garnett, Keith Joseph, 193.
N. Tebbit, Upwardly Mobile (London: Futura edition, 1989), 134.
D. Hurd, An End to Promises: Sketch of a Government 1970–74 (London: Collins, 1979), 12–13.
T. Stacey and R. St Oswald (eds), Here Come the Tories (London: Tom Stacey, 1970).
S. Ball, ‘The Conservatives in opposition, 1906–79: a comparative analysis’, in M. Garnett and P. Lynch (eds), The Conservatives in Crisis: The Tories after 1997 (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2003), 23.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2005 Mark Garnett
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Garnett, M. (2005). Planning for Power: 1964–1970. In: Ball, S., Seldon, A. (eds) Recovering Power. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230522411_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230522411_9
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-4039-3242-6
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-52241-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)