Abstract
This chapter examines the emotionally charged debates in Georgia which have been unleashed by recent attempts to change how history is being written and taught. In December 2008, Simon Janashia, director of the National Curriculum and Assessment Centre at the Georgian Ministry of Education, gave a talk on the new history books at the Centre for the Study of the Caucasus and Black Sea Region (CBSR).1 This presentation generated intense discussion and passionate responses. One historian teaching at the University of Georgia exclaimed; ‘This is some kind of experiment that they are trying to conduct on Georgia … you are trying to raise global citizens and uproot patriotism in this country … that’s what it is!’ This type of impassioned response is typical for the debate on the new history textbooks. Critics are dissatisfied that someone else has a monopoly on the nature of collective memories which will be instilled.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
James Wertsch (2005), ‘Generalized Collective Dialogue and Advanced Foreign Language Capacities’, Plenary Paper for Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics (Washington, DC: Georgetown University).
Maurice Halbwachs (1980), The Collective Memory (New York, NY: Harper & Row, Harper Colophon Books), p. 64.
Deniz Coskun (2007), ‘The Politics of Myth: Ernst Cassirer’s Pathology of the Totalitarian State’, Law as Symbolic Form. Ernst Cassirer and the Anthropocentric View of Law (The Netherlands: Springer), pp. 135–72, here p. 153.
Susanne K. Langer (1958), ‘On Cassirer’s Theory of Language and Myth’, in Paul Schilpp (ed.), The Philosophy of Ernest Cassirer (New York, NY: Tudor), pp. 381–400, here p. 384.
Ernest Cassirer (1953), Language and Myth (New York, NY: Dover), p. 50.
See James Wertsch (2002), Voices of Collective Remembering (New York, NY: Cambridge University Press), p. 62.
See Tzvetan Todorov (1984), Mikhail Bakhtin: The Dialogical Principle. Theory & History of Literature (Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press).
Mikhail Meskhi and Valter Guchua (1974), saqartvelos istoria History of Georgia 7–10 grades (Tbilisi: ganatleba), pp. 3–4.
Jan Assmann (2005), Cultural Memories and National Narratives with Some Relation to the Case of Georgia. White Paper Report prepared for the Georgian Ministry of Education ‘Negotiating a New National Narrative in Georgia’, p. 14.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2012 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Batiashvili, N. (2012). The ‘Myth’ of the Self: The Georgian National Narrative and Quest for ‘Georgianness’. In: Assmann, A., Shortt, L. (eds) Memory and Political Change. Palgrave Macmillan Memory Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230354241_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230354241_11
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-230-30200-6
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-35424-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave Media & Culture CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)