An Endoscopic Dural Retractor for Spinal Stenosis Surgery

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Adequate neural decompression is the goal of lumbar stenosis surgery. Often because of limited visualization of the nerve root, significant portions of the facet joints are removed for decompression enhancing the potential for the development of instability. Clearly, the goal to better visualize the anatomy of the lateral recess while decompressing the nerve root may result in better root decompression and a smaller potential for instability secondary to bone loss. In order to accomplish this goal we have designed an endoscopic dural retractor that while retracting the dura permits simultaneous visualization of the anatomy of the lateral recess and the activity of instruments used to decompress it. The endoscopic dural retractor contains a 10,000 pixel endoscope that allows a direct lateral view into the lateral recess while the dura is being retracted. This is a view that cannot be achieved with the operating microscope. One can easily appreciate the anatomy of the lateral recess including the facet joint, ligamentum flavum, lateral dura and nerve root. Ten geriatric cadaver lateral recesses were decompressed endoscopically using the endoscopic retractor. Compression of the nerve root by the facet and ligamentum could easily be identified. One could visually monitor the use of instruments on removal of ligamentum flava and bone compressing the nerve root. In all cases the ligament was easily removed and the facet joint was undercut only enough to decompress the nerve. This instrument has the potential for less invasive decompression of spinal stenosis and further study of its utility is planned.

References

• 1 Javid M J, Hadar E J. Long-term follow-up review of patients who underwent laminectomy for lumbar stenosis: a prospective study.  J Neurosurg. 1998;  89 1-7
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Lee C K, Rauschning W, Glenn W. Lateral lumbar spinal canal stenosis: Classification, pathologic anatomy and surgical decompression.  Spine. 1988;  13 313-320
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Silvers H R, Lewis P J, Asch H L. Decompressive lumbar laminectomy for spinal stenosis.  J Neurosurg. 1993;  78 695-701
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Yoshida M, Shima K, Taniguchi Y, Tamaki T, Tanaka T. Hypertrophied ligamentum flavum in lumbar spinal stenosis.  Spine. 1992;  17 1353-1360
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Tuite G F, Stern J D, Doran S E. et al . Outcome after laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis. Part I: Clinical correlations.  J Neurosurg. 1994;  81 707-715
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Tuite G F, Doran S E, Stern J D. et al . Outcome after laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis. Part II: Radiographic changes and clinical correlations.  J Neurosurg. 1994;  81 707-715
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Sanderson P L, Getty C J. Long-term results of partial undercutting facetectomy for lumbar lateral recess stenosis.  Spine. 1996;  21 1352-1356
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Frank E H. Removal of lateral disc herniation using a malleable endoscopic forceps.  Neurosurgery. 1998;  41 311-313
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Haines S, Camarata P, Finn M, Poss T. Prototype instruments for endoscopic microsurgery: Technical note.  Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery. 1995;  38 167-169
  PubMedGoogle Scholar

Dr. E. H. Frank

Department of Neurosurgery · Oregon Health Sciences University

3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road

Portland, Oregon 97201 · USA

Phone: + 1-503-494-4314 ·

Fax: + 1-503-494-7161