Endoscopy 2002; 34(1): 2-12
DOI: 10.1055/s-2002-19389
State of the Art Review

© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Premedication, Preparation, and Surveillance

G.  D.  Bell1
  • 1Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Sunderland, Sunderland, United Kingdom
Further Information

Publication History

Submitted

Accepted after Revision

Publication Date:
14 August 2002 (online)

The vigorous debate over whom to sedate, when to sedate, and how to sedate shows no sign of running out of steam. There is a general consensus that patients should be more involved in the decision-making process for the sedation “menu”. A move away from the take-it-or-leave-it attitude of all or nothing to an “à la carte” choice is to be encouraged. A new textbook and several further guidelines have appeared. The particular problems associated with sedating the elderly are briefly presented. The pros and cons of using local pharyngeal anaesthesia are discussed. Enthusiasm for the use of intravenous propofol is gathering momentum, despite continuing worries about its safety in the hands of the nonanaesthetist. For many endoscopists, the combination of a benzodiazepine plus (or minus) an opioid with which they are most familiar is still the best compromise in terms of efficacy, cost, and safety. Fatal drug-induced cardiopulmonary complications continue to occur, despite a general trend toward using smaller doses of sedation than we did 5 - 10 years ago. Monitoring techniques that are at present considered as research tools may one day become commonplace. These include: the use of an electroencephalography parameter known as bispectral analysis; transcutaneous CO2 measurement; and a modified continuous capnographic waveform trace to monitor ventilatory effort. Bispectral analysis may be of use in monitoring central nervous system depression and helping to distinguish between conscious sedation and deep sedation. If the measurement of CO2 levels, either transcutaneously or in breath samples, was as easy and inexpensive as measuring SpO2 with a pulse oximeter, then undoubtedly such technology would enhance the early detection of sedative-induced hypoventilation and apnoea. Further evidence regarding droperidol's possible role in conscious sedation is presented. Pain during colonoscopy remains a problem, and the possible role for intraluminal injection of peppermint oil, as well as the value of variable-stiffness colonoscopes, in reducing the need for intravenous sedation is discussed. Case reports of hyponatraemic encephalopathy and hypocalcaemic tetany as complications of oral bowel preparation are presented, as is the challenge associated with adequate bowel preparation in diabetic patients.

References

  • 1 Lazzaroni M, Bianco-Porro G. Review: premedication, preparation and surveillance.  Endoscopy. 1999;  31 2-8
  • 2 Bell G D. Premedication, preparation and surveillance.  Endoscopy. 2000;  32 92-100
  • 3 Lazzaroni M, Bianco-Porro G. Review: Premedication, preparation and surveillance.  Endoscopy. 2001;  33 103-108
  • 4 Weiner-Kronish J P, Gropper M A. Conscious sedation. Philadelphia; Hanley and Belfus 2001
  • 5 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy . ASGE guidelines: modification in endoscopic practice for pediatric patients.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;  52 838-842
  • 6 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy . ASGE guidelines: modification in endoscopic practice for the elderly.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;  52 849-851
  • 7 Clarke G A, Jacobson B C, Hammett R J, Carr-Locke D L. The indications, utilization and safety of gastrointestinal endoscopy in an extremely elderly patient cohort.  Endoscopy. 2001;  33 580-584
  • 8 Wong R CK. The menu of endoscopic sedation: all-you-can-eat, combination set, à la carte, alternative cuisine, or go hungry [editorial].  Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;  54 122-126
  • 9 Bell G D, Charlton J E. Colonoscopy: is sedation necessary and is there a role for intravenous propofol?.  Endoscopy. 2000;  32 264-267
  • 10 Maroy B. Level of sedation needed for colonoscopy in an individual patient, and how it should be predicted.  Endoscopy. 2001;  33 465-466
  • 11 Isenberg G. Topical anesthesia: to use or not use - that is the question.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;  53 130-133
  • 12 Boyce H W. Behavior in the endoscopy room.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;  53 133-136
  • 13 Carr-Locke D L, Gostout C J, van Dam J. A guideline for live endoscopy courses: an ASGE white paper.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;  53 685-688
  • 14 Soma Y, Saito H, Kishibe T. et al . Evaluation of topical pharyngeal anesthesia for upper endoscopy, including factors associated with patient tolerance.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;  53 14-18
  • 15 LaLuna L, Allen M L, DiMarino, Jr A J. The comparison of midazolam and topical lidocaine spray versus the combination of midazolam, meperidine and topical lidocaine spray to sedate patients for upper endoscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;  53 289-293
  • 16 Gunaratnam N T, Vazquez-Sequeiros E, Gostout C J, Alexander G L. Methemoglobinemia related to topical benzocaine use: is it time to reconsider the empiric use of topical anesthesia before sedated EGD?.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;  52 692-693
  • 17 Academy of Medical Royal Colleges and their Faculties in the United Kingdom and Ireland .Implementing and ensuring safe sedation practice for healthcare procedures in adults: report of a Working Party set up by the Royal College of Anaesthetists, chaired by Professor J. A. W. Wildsmith. London; AOMRC 2001
  • 18 Bower A L, Ripepi A, Dilger A. et al . Bispectral index monitoring of sedation during endoscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;  52 192-196
  • 19 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy . ASGE technology status evaluation report: propofol use during gastrointestinal endoscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;  53 876-879
  • 20 Elitsur Y, Blankenship P, Lawrence Z. Propofol sedation for endoscopic procedures in children.  Endoscopy. 2000;  32 788-791
  • 21 Seifert H, Schnitt T H, Gultekin W F. et al . Sedation with propofol plus midazolam versus propofol alone for interventional endoscopic procedures: a prospective, randomized study.  Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2000;  14 1207-1214
  • 22 Krugliak P, Ziff B, Rusabrov Y. et al . Propofol versus midazolam for conscious sedation guided by processed EEG during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a prospective, randomised, double-blind study.  Endoscopy. 2000;  32 677-682
  • 23 Vargo J J, Zuccaro G, Dumot J A. et al . Gastroenterologist-administered propofol for therapeutic upper endoscopy with graphic assessment of respiratory activity: a case series.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;  52 250-255
  • 24 Koshy G, Nair S, Norkus E P. et al . Propofol versus midazolam and meperidine for conscious sedation in GI endoscopy.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2000;  95 1476-1479
  • 25 Kulling D, Fantin A C, Biro P. et al . Safer colonoscopy with patient-controlled analgesia and sedation with propofol and alfentanil.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;  54 1-7
  • 26 Ng J, Kong C, Nyam D. Patient-controlled sedation with propofol for colonoscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;  54 8-13
  • 27 Gilham M J, Hutchinson R C, Carter R, Kenny G NC. Patient-maintained sedation for ERCP with a target-controlled infusion of propofol: a pilot study.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;  54 14-17
  • 28 Barawi M, Gress F. Conscious sedation: is there a need for improvement?.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;  51 365-368
  • 29 Willie R T, Barnett J L, Chey W D. et al . Routine droperidol premedication improves sedation for ERCP.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;  52 362-366
  • 30 Farrell R J, Noonan N, Mahmud N. et al . Potential impact of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography workload and complication rate in patients referred because of abdominal pain.  Endoscopy. 2001;  33 668-675
  • 31 Asao T, Mochiki E, Suzuki H. et al . An easy method for the intraluminal administration of peppermint oil before colonoscopy and its effectiveness in reducing colonic spasm.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;  53 172-177
  • 32 Somerville K W, Richmond C R, Bell G D. Delayed release peppermint oil capsules (Colpermin) for the spastic colon syndrome: a pharmacokinetic study.  Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1984;  18 638-640
  • 33 Wehrmann T, Schmitt T, Stergiou N. et al . Topical application of nitrates onto the papilla of Vater: manometric and clinical studies.  Endoscopy. 2001;  33 323-328
  • 34 Martin J P, Sexton B F, Saunders B P, Atkin W S. Inhaled patient-administered nitrous oxide mixture does not impair driving ability when used as analgesia during screening flexible sigmoidoscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;  51 701-703
  • 35 Shah S G, Saunders B P, Brooker J C, Williams C B. Magnetic imaging of colonoscopy: an audit of looping, accuracy and ancillary maneuvers.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;  52 1-8
  • 36 Waye J D. Imaging of the colonoscope: magnetic, fluoroscopic, or neither?.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;  52 131-133
  • 37 Brooker J C, Saunders B P, Shan S G, Williams C B. A new variable stiffness colonoscope makes colonoscopy easier: a randomised controlled trial.  Gut. 2000;  46 801-805
  • 38 Sorbi D, Schleck C D, Zinsmeister A R, Gostout C J. Clinical application of a new colonoscope with variable insertion tube rigidity: a pilot study.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;  53 638-642
  • 39 Rex D K. Effect of variable stiffness colonoscopes on cecal intubation times for routine colonoscopy by an experienced examiner in sedated patients.  Endoscopy. 2001;  33 60-64
  • 40 Odori T, Goto H, Arisawa T. et al . Clinical results and development of variable-stiffness video colonoscopes.  Endoscopy. 2001;  33 65-69
  • 41 Ladas S D. Factors predicting the possibility of conducting colonoscopy without sedation.  Endoscopy. 2000;  32 688-692
  • 42 Kim W H, Cho Y J, Park J Y. et al . Factors affecting insertion time and patient discomfort during colonoscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;  52 600-605
  • 43 Thiis-Evensen E, Hoff G S, Sauar J, Vatn M H. Patient tolerance of colonoscopy without sedation during screening examination for colorectal polyps.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;  52 606-610
  • 44 Yacavone R F, Locke G R, Gostout C J. et al . Factors influencing patient satisfaction with GI endoscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;  53 703-710
  • 45 Nelson D B, Freeman M L, Silvis S E. et al . A randomised controlled trial of transcutaneous carbon dioxide monitoring during ERCP.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;  51 288-295
  • 46 Ristikankare M, Julkunen R, Laitinen T. et al . Effect of conscious sedation on cardiac autonomic regulation during colonoscopy.  Scand J Gastroenterol. 2000;  35 990-996
  • 47 Petelenz M, Musialik J, Besser P. et al . Cardiac sympathovagal balance during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.  Endoscopy. 2000;  32 683-687
  • 48 Shaoul R, Wolff R, Seligmann H. et al . Symptoms of hyperphosphatemia, hypocalcaemia, and hypomagnesemia in an adolescent after oral administration of sodium phosphate in preparation for a colonoscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;  53 650-652
  • 49 Schroppel B, Segerer S, Keuneke C. et al . Hyponatraemic encephalopathy after preparation for colonoscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;  53 527-529
  • 50 Taylor C, Schubert M L. Decreased efficacy of polyethylene glycol lavage solution (GoLytely) in the preparation of diabetic patients for outpatient colonoscopy: a prospective and blinded study.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2001;  96 710-714

G. D. Bell

Faculty of Medical Sciences · University of Sunderland

The Grange · Chilton Moor · Durham DH4 6QB · United Kingdom

Email: duncan_bell@compuserve.com

    >