J Wrist Surg 2024; 13(02): 142-150
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1770793
Scientific Article

Trapeziectomy versus Maïa Prosthesis in Trapeziometacarpal Osteoarthritis

1   Department Traumatology, AUVA Trauma Center Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
2   Ludwig-Boltzmann-Institute for Experimental and Clinical Traumatology in AUVA Trauma Research Center, Wien, Austria
,
Johann Neureiter
1   Department Traumatology, AUVA Trauma Center Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
,
Josef Schauer
1   Department Traumatology, AUVA Trauma Center Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
,
Georg Zimmermann
3   Team Biostatistics and Big Medical Data, IDA Lab Salzburg, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
4   Research and Innovation Management, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
,
Christoph Hirnsperger
1   Department Traumatology, AUVA Trauma Center Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
› Author Affiliations
Funding This investigation was done in the AUVA Trauma Center Salzburg, Austria and the institution received no funding or financial support for this investigation.

Abstract

Background Osteoarthritis at the base of the thumb is the most frequent osteoarthritis of the hand. Trapeziectomy in a broad variety of surgical methods have been proposed to achieve pain reduction and improvement of thumb function. A well-known disadvantage is the long recovery time. Arthroplasty of the thumb carpometacarpal joint is a competing new method for this indication with different revision and complication rates reported.

Purposes The aim of this study is to assess whether there are significant differences in outcome during the first 12 months and time return to work after either, implant of a Maïa joint prosthesis, or trapeziectomy with tendon interposition after Weilby.

Patients and Methods This clinical follow-up study compares the efficacy of total basal joint replacement using the Maïa prosthesis with tendon interposition arthroplasty in 59 thumbs. Clinical, functional, and radiological results at preoperative, 3-, 6-, and 12-month postoperative are presented.

Results We found a significant shorter return to work in the prosthesis group with 4.5 compared with 8.6 weeks. In addition to a significant difference in pain reduction with a better Mayo wrist score in the Maïa group after 3 months. The scores are closer after 6 months and nearly match after 12 months. Measurement of the pinch grip showed a parallel course. A radiological loosening of the cup in two patients was detected after 12 months.

Conclusion Implantation of Maïa prosthesis enables a significant shorter recovery but is associated with the risk of loosening and higher costs.

Level of Evidence Level IV, case–control study.

Ethical Approval

Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the ethics committee for the hospitals of the AUVA of Austria (Approval number: 02/2020).




Publication History

Received: 18 October 2022

Accepted: 29 May 2023

Article published online:
13 July 2023

© 2023. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • References

  • 1 Kollig E, Bieler D, Franke A. [Replacement of the thumb carpometacarpal joint: current importance of endoprosthetics for operative treatment of rhizarthrosis]. Unfallchirurg 2016; 119 (12) 1007-1014
  • 2 Martin-Ferrero M. Ten-year long-term results of total joint arthroplasties with ARPE implant in the treatment of trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2014; 39 (08) 826-832
  • 3 Sodha S, Ring D, Zurakowski D, Jupiter JB. Prevalence of osteoarthrosis of the trapeziometacarpal joint. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005; 87 (12) 2614-2618
  • 4 Ulrich-Vinther M, Puggaard H, Lange B. Prospective 1-year follow-up study comparing joint prosthesis with tendon interposition arthroplasty in treatment of trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis. J Hand Surg Am 2008; 33 (08) 1369-1377
  • 5 Angly B, Steiger R, Stober R. [Interposition arthroplasty for the treatment of primary osteoarthritis: comparison of results using the technique of Epping and Weilby]. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 2006; 38 (02) 90-97
  • 6 Toffoli A, Teissier J. MAÏA trapeziometacarpal joint arthroplasty: clinical and radiological outcomes of 80 patients with more than 6 years of follow-up. J Hand Surg Am 2017; 42 (10) 838.e1-838.e8
  • 7 Vadstrup LS, Schou L, Boeckstyns ME. Basal joint osteoarthritis of the thumb treated with Weilby arthroplasty: a prospective study on the early postoperative course of 106 consecutive cases. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2009; 34 (04) 503-505
  • 8 Vermeulen GM, Brink SM, Sluiter J, Elias SG, Hovius SE, Moojen TM. Ligament reconstruction arthroplasty for primary thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis (Weilby technique): prospective cohort study. J Hand Surg Am 2009; 34 (08) 1393-1401
  • 9 Wajon A, Vinycomb T, Carr E, Edmunds I, Ada L. Surgery for thumb (trapeziometacarpal joint) osteoarthritis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; 2015 (02) CD004631
  • 10 Damen A, Dijkstra T, van der Lei B, den Dunnen WF, Robinson PH. Long-term results of arthrodesis of the carpometacarpal joint of the thumb. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 2001; 35 (04) 407-413
  • 11 Mureau MA, Rademaker RP, Verhaar JA, Hovius SE. Tendon interposition arthroplasty versus arthrodesis for the treatment of trapeziometacarpal arthritis: a retrospective comparative follow-up study. J Hand Surg Am 2001; 26 (05) 869-876
  • 12 De la Caffiniere JY. Prothese totale trapezometacarpienne. Rev Chir Orth 1973; 59 (05) 299-308
  • 13 Badia A, Sambandam SN. Total joint arthroplasty in the treatment of advanced stages of thumb carpometacarpal joint osteoarthritis. J Hand Surg Am 2006; 31 (10) 1605-1614
  • 14 Barron OA, Glickel SZ, Eaton RG. Basal joint arthritis of the thumb. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2000; 8 (05) 314-323
  • 15 Wachtl SW, Sennwald GR. Non-cemented replacement of the trapeziometacarpal joint. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1996; 78 (05) 787-792
  • 16 Gay AM, Cerlier A, Iniesta A, Legré R. Surgery for trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis. Hand Surg Rehabil 2016; 35 (04) 238-249
  • 17 Jager T, Barbary S, Dap F, Dautel G. [Evaluation of postoperative pain and early functional results in the treatment of carpometacarpal joint arthritis. Comparative prospective study of trapeziectomy vs. MAIA prosthesis in 74 female patients]. Chir Main 2013; 32 (02) 55-62
  • 18 Andrzejewski A, Ledoux P. Maïa trapeziometacarpal joint arthroplasty: survival and clinical outcomes at 5 years' follow-up. Hand Surg Rehabil 2019; 38 (03) 169-173
  • 19 Bricout M, Rezzouk J. Complications and failures of the trapeziometacarpal Maia prosthesis: a series of 156 cases. Hand Surg Rehabil 2016; 35 (03) 190-198
  • 20 Cootjans K, Vanhaecke J, Dezillie M, Barth J, Pottel H, Stockmans F. Joint survival analysis and clinical outcome of total joint arthroplasties with the ARPE implant in the treatment of trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis with a minimal follow-up of 5 years. J Hand Surg Am 2017; 42 (08) 630-638
  • 21 Goubau JF, Goorens CK, Van Hoonacker P, Berghs B, Kerckhove D, Scheerlinck T. Clinical and radiological outcomes of the Ivory arthroplasty for trapeziometacarpal joint osteoarthritis with a minimum of 5 years of follow-up: a prospective single-centre cohort study. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2013; 38 (08) 866-874
  • 22 Eaton RG, Glickel SZ. Trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis. Staging as a rationale for treatment. Hand Clin 1987; 3 (04) 455-471
  • 23 Caekebeke P, Duerinckx J. Can surgical guidelines minimize complications after Maïa trapeziometacarpal joint arthroplasty with unconstrained cups?. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2018; 43 (04) 420-425
  • 24 Weilby A. Tendon interposition arthroplasty of the first carpo-metacarpal joint. J Hand Surg [Br] 1988; 13 (04) 421-425
  • 25 Alnot JY, Saint Laurent Y. Total trapeziometacarpal arthroplasty. Report on seventeen cases of de generative arthritis of the trapeziometacarpal joint. Ann Chir Main 1985; 4 (01) 11-21
  • 26 Noguchi K, Gel YR, Brunner E, Konietschke F. nparLD: an R software package for the nonparametric analysis of longitudinal data in factorial experiments. J Stat Softw 2012; 50: 1-23
  • 27 Shah DS, Middleton C, Gurdezi S, Horwitz MD, Kedgley AE. The effect of surgical treatments for trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis on wrist biomechanics: a cadaver study. J Hand Surg Am 2020; 45 (05) 389-398
  • 28 Johnston P, Getgood A, Larson D, Chojnowski AJ, Chakrabarti AJ, Chapman PG. De la Caffinière thumb trapeziometacarpal joint arthroplasty: 16-26 year follow-up. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2012; 37 (07) 621-624
  • 29 Klahn A, Nygaard M, Gvozdenovic R, Boeckstyns ME. Elektra prosthesis for trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis: a follow-up of 39 consecutive cases. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2012; 37 (07) 605-609
  • 30 Kaszap B, Daecke W, Jung M. Outcome comparison of primary trapeziectomy versus secondary trapeziectomy following failed total trapeziometacarpal joint replacement. J Hand Surg Am 2013; 38 (05) 863-871.e3
  • 31 Renfree KJ, Dell PC. Functional outcome following salvage of failed trapeziometacarpal joint arthroplasty. J Hand Surg [Br] 2002; 27 (01) 96-100
  • 32 Cooney III WP, Leddy TP, Larson DR. Revision of thumb trapeziometacarpal arthroplasty. J Hand Surg Am 2006; 31 (02) 219-227
  • 33 Megerle K, Grouls S, Germann G, Kloeters O, Hellmich S. Revision surgery after trapeziometacarpal arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2011; 131 (02) 205-210