Clinical Classification of Urethrocutaneous Fistulas Developing after Hypospadias Repair

 

 Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background Clinical classification of the urethrocutaneous fistulas (UCFs) was designed to help the surgeons in (1) categorizing the fistulas, (2) selecting appropriate treatments, (3) keeping record at presentation and discharge, and (4) transferring information while referring a patient with recurrent fistula to a higher center.

Methods This retrospective study comprised of 68 patients with UCFs who reported in the “Hypospadias and VVFs Clinic” between 2004 and 2016. The study was performed to determine the incidence or etiology of the UCFs. It was rather performed to classify fistulas into different categories depending on the number of fistulas: A (5 fistulas), B (16 fistulas), C-a (28 fistulas), C-b (4 fistulas), D (4 fistulas), and E (11 fistulas). Category A fistulas healed conservatively. Category B fistulas underwent transection of the fistula tracts (tractotomy), purse-string closure, or multilayered closure (fistulorrhaphy). Category C-a fistulas were reenforced by preputial or penile skin flaps or waterproofing flaps. Category C-b fistulas underwent re-tubularization of their neourethral plates and eccentric closure of peno-preputial skin. The urethral plates of category D fistulas were re-tubularized after 3 to 6 months and cover was provided by the Cecil-Culp procedure. Category E fistulas had associated hairy urethra, stricture distal urethra, stricture with diverticulum, perifistular scar-induced chordee, long narrow urethral plate, balanitis xerotica obliterans (BXO), and short reconstructed neourethra. Accordingly, appropriate corrective measures were taken. Miscellaneous category F was excluded from the study.

Results Except for one in category D, none of the patients had any recurrence of fistula. One patient of category E had residual diverticulum.

Conclusion The designed clinical classification of UCFs is simple. Treatment was in accordance with reconstructive ladder wherein complexity of treatment paralleled with increasing complexity of fistulas.

Publication History

Article published online:
10 March 2023

© 2023. Association of Plastic Surgeons of India. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

• References

• 1 Chtourou M, Attyaoui F, Ben Younes A, Rekik H, Horchani A. Repair of urethrocutaneous fistula with double skin flap. Report of 32 cases. Prog Urol 2000; 10 (02) 261-264
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Ehle JJ, Cooper CS, Peche WJ, Hawtrey CE. Application of the Cecil-Culp repair for treatment of urethrocutaneous fistulas after hypospadias surgery. Urology 2001; 57 (02) 347-350
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Smith D. A de-epithelialised overlap flap technique in the repair of hypospadias. Br J Plast Surg 1973; 26 (02) 106-114
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Muruganandham K, Ansari MS, Dubey D. et al. Urethrocutaneous fistula after hypospadias repair: outcome of three types of closure techniques. Pediatr Surg Int 2010; 26 (03) 305-308
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Sen B, Adayener C, Akyol I. Repairing urethrocutaneous fistula in adults: is a catheter necessary?. Urology 2007; 70 (02) 239-241
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Srivastava RK, Tandale MS, Panse N, Gupta A, Sahane P. Management of urethrocutaneous fistula after hypospadias surgery: an experience of thirty-five cases. Indian J Plast Surg 2011; 44 (01) 98-103
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Landau EH, Gofrit ON, Meretyk S. et al. Outcome analysis of tunica vaginalis flap for the correction of recurrent urethrocutaneous fistula in children. J Urol 2003; 170 (4, Pt 2): , discussion 1599 1596-1599
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Holland AJ, Abubacker M, Smith GH, Cass DT. Management of urethrocutaneous fistula following hypospadias repair. Pediatr Surg Int 2008; 24 (09) 1047-1051
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Chandrasekharam VV. Temporary re-catheterization as a treatment for early fistulas after hypospadias repair. J Pediatr Urol 2016; 12 (02) 129-130
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Fatah MF. A method of closing urethral fistulae using a purse-string or interrupted silk sutures. Br J Plast Surg 1982; 35 (01) 102-103
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Elbakry A. Management of urethrocutaneous fistula after hypospadias repair: 10 years' experience. BJU Int 2001; 88 (06) 590-595
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Singh RB, Dalal S, Pavithran N. Soft tissue reinforcement interposition flaps in hypospadias repair. Indian J Plast Surg 2007; 40 (02) 170-177
  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
• 13 Howe AS, Hanna MK. Management of 220 adolescents and adults with complications of hypospadias repair during childhood. Asian J Urol 2017; 4 (01) 14-17
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Tamer Y, Husein BK, Ayman H, Hisham El M. Assessment and management of urethrocutaneous fistula developing after hypospadias repair. Ann Pediatr Surg 2011; 7 (02) 88-93
  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
• 15 Sarin YK, Kumar P. Female hypospadias: need for clarity in definition and management. J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg 2019; 24 (02) 141-143
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar