Am J Perinatol 2024; 41(S 01): e1023-e1029
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1759864
Original Article

Association between Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome and Congenital Anomalies in the United States

Parth Bhatt
1   Department of Pediatrics, United Hospital Center, Bridgeport, West Virginia
,
Cecilia Ampem-Darko
2   Department of Pediatrics, Tema General Hospital, Tema, Ghana
,
Grace Annan Cudjoe
3   Department of Pediatrics, University of Ghana School of Medicine and Dentistry, Accra, Ghana
,
Narendrasinh Parmar
4   Section of Emergency Medicine, East Tennessee Children's Hospital, Knoxville, Tennessee
,
Igbagbosanmi Oredein
5   Pediatric Residency Program, Hurley Medical Center, Flint, Michigan
,
Adwoa O. Asiama
6   Department of Medicine, Pantang Hospital, Accra, Greater Accra, Ghana
,
Jenil Patel
7   Center for Pediatric and Population Health, School of Public Health, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UT Health), Texas
,
Sahithi Pemmasani
8   Pediatric Residency Program, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Elmhurst Hospital Center, New York, New York
,
Vijay Gandhi Linga
9   Department of Pediatrics, San Juan Regional Medical Center, Farmington, New Mexico
,
Keyur Donda
10   Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida
,
Harshit Doshi
11   Golisano Children's Hospital of Southwest Florida, Fort Myers, Florida
,
12   Department of Medicine, Valley Children's Hospital, Madera, California
› Author Affiliations
Funding None.

Abstract

Objective Studies exploring the relationship between neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) and congenital anomalies (CA) in the United States are limited given the small sample size or data prior to the opioid epidemic. We aimed to determine if there is an association between NAS and CA in a nationally representative cohort of newborn hospitalization in the United States.

Study Design This was a cross-sectional analysis of NAS-related hospitalizations within the 2016 Kids Inpatient Database. International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10-CM) diagnostic codes were used to identify NAS hospitalizations and those with and without CA. The primary outcome was the odds of CAs in NAS hospitalizations. Multivariate survey logistic regression was used to analyze the relationship between NAS and CA.

Results Among 3.7 million newborn hospitalizations, 25,394 had NAS (6.7 per 1,000). The prevalence of any CA was higher in those with NAS when compared with non-NAS hospitalizations (10.3 vs. 4.9%; odds ratio = 2.27; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.13–2.43). Adjusted analysis showed similar results (adjusted odds ratio: = 1.83, CI: 1.71–1.95). NAS hospitalizations with CA had a higher mortality rate (0.6 vs 0.04%, p < 0.0001) and higher resource use.

Conclusion This nationwide study shows that NAS may be associated with increased odds of CAs, suggesting that NAS may be a risk factor for increased morbidity in the newborn period.

Key points

  • 1 in 10 newborns with NAS had at least one congenital anomaly.

  • NAS hospitalization with congenital anomalies had higher resource use and mortality.

  • Pediatricians caring for newborns with NAS should have a high index of suspicion for birth defects.

Note

Prior presentation of abstract or Poster: An abstract of this study was accepted for poster presentation at the 2022. The Eastern Society for Pediatric Research (ESPR) Meeting and Oral presentation at the 2021 Pediatric Academic Societies (PAS) meeting.

Data Sharing Statement: Deidentified individual participant data will not be made available. The raw data were obtained from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality ( https://www.hcupus.ahrq.gov )


Authors' Contributions

V.G.L., N.P., J.P., S.P. conceptualized and designed the study, drafted the initial manuscript, and reviewed and revised the manuscript. C.A.-D., H.D., G.A.C., I.O., and A.O.A conceptualized and designed the study, designed the data collection instruments, collected data, performed the initial analyses, and reviewed and revised the manuscript. P.B., K.D., and F. D.-S. conceptualized and designed the study, coordinated and supervised data collection, and critically reviewed the manuscript for important intellectual content. All authors approved the final manuscript as submitted and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.


Supplementary Material



Publication History

Received: 15 June 2022

Accepted: 08 November 2022

Article published online:
26 December 2022

© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA